Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-27 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 23 July 2005 12:45, Nix wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled: > > On Friday 22 July 2005 18:53, Ruaidhri Power wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:23:46AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > >> > Which was the old UML version? Which is your guest distro? > >> > Also, have

Re: Kernel virtual memory size shrunk to ... (was: Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem)

2005-07-27 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 25 July 2005 19:10, Ruaidhri Power wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:18:13PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 22 July 2005 18:53, Ruaidhri Power wrote: > I may try another host or guest distro if that might be causing the > problem, both are Debian sarge at the moment. Don't thi

Kernel virtual memory size shrunk to ... (was: Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem)

2005-07-25 Thread Ruaidhri Power
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:18:13PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 22 July 2005 18:53, Ruaidhri Power wrote: > > > > Kernel virtual memory size shrunk to 32505856 bytes > > > > Ok, here it's going to use just 32M of kernel memory rather than 768M... > > > Did it happen even before? > > >

Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-23 Thread Nix
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled: > On Friday 22 July 2005 18:53, Ruaidhri Power wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:23:46AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: >> > Which was the old UML version? Which is your guest distro? >> > Also, have you tested the old UML releases on this new host kern

Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 22 July 2005 18:53, Ruaidhri Power wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:23:46AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Which was the old UML version? Which is your guest distro? > > Also, have you tested the old UML releases on this new host kernel > > version? Since UML address space is getting s

Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-22 Thread Ruaidhri Power
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:23:46AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > Which was the old UML version? Which is your guest distro? > Also, have you tested the old UML releases on this new host kernel version? > Since UML address space is getting shrinked down to 32M, I fear address space > randomization

Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-20 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 16:39, Ruaidhri Power wrote: > I've just upgraded UML, > and came across this problem: when starting the > guest, output stops after "VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) > readonly." - at that point the guest takes 100% CPU, consuming both user > and system time. > The

Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-20 Thread Ruaidhri Power
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:54:19PM -0500, Jason Clark wrote: > silly question, but I had a similar issue (cpu and ram) when my guest > was running an FSCK. Are you running an fsck or is it idle? I don't think this is the problem, since adding mode=tt to the guest makes it boot properly, ie. withou

Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-20 Thread Jason Clark
silly question, but I had a similar issue (cpu and ram) when my guest was running an FSCK. Are you running an fsck or is it idle? -- Jason The place where you made your stand never mattered. Only that you were there.. And still on your feet. On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Ruaidhri Power wrote: I've ju

[uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-20 Thread Ruaidhri Power
I've just upgraded UML, and came across this problem: when starting the guest, output stops after "VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly." - at that point the guest takes 100% CPU, consuming both user and system time. The host is Debian sarge, running vanilla 2.6.12 with the skas-2.6.12-v8.