Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-27 Thread WANG Cong
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:28:49 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 02:31:23PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > The above patch contains Ingo's, Al's and my patch. And Ingo's is merged in > > commit b15136e9497ef5d6e08cf665e0d0acf7a229f6dc, mine is merged in commit > > 2

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-27 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 02:31:23PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > The above patch contains Ingo's, Al's and my patch. And Ingo's is merged in > commit b15136e9497ef5d6e08cf665e0d0acf7a229f6dc, mine is merged in commit > 23464ffa47689e46985fb10ae9e34bbc9e83f387. So I just need to apply Al's patch > ma

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-26 Thread WANG Cong
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:29:31 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:51:44PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > And backtrace is: > > > > #0 0x0807b197 in kernel_sigprocmask (how=0, set=0xbf89bd2c, > > oldset=0xbf89bcac) > > at kernel/signal.c:1981 > > 1981

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-26 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:51:44PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > And backtrace is: > > #0 0x0807b197 in kernel_sigprocmask (how=0, set=0xbf89bd2c, > oldset=0xbf89bcac) > at kernel/signal.c:1981 > 1981*oldset = current->blocked; You either need the patch below on top of what

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-25 Thread WANG Cong
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:44:59 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:03:11PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > $ ls -l core.10752 > > -rw--- 1 wangcong wangcong 2207744 10-25 14:00 core.10752 > > > > What should I do then? > > gdb it and get a backtrace, although I

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-25 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:03:11PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > $ ls -l core.10752 > -rw--- 1 wangcong wangcong 2207744 10-25 14:00 core.10752 > > What should I do then? gdb it and get a backtrace, although I'm suspicious that it's the main process, not the child that unexpectedly segfaulted.

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-24 Thread WANG Cong
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:04:03 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:08:16PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > $ ./linux ubd0=~/Download/Fedora7-x86-root_fs root=/dev/ubd0 > > > > But it failed and the failure log was: > > > > Core dump limits : > > soft - 0 >

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:08:16PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > $ ./linux ubd0=~/Download/Fedora7-x86-root_fs root=/dev/ubd0 > > But it failed and the failure log was: > > Core dump limits : > soft - 0 > hard - NONE > Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...check_ptrac

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-23 Thread WANG Cong
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:52:58 +0100 Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > WANG Cong wrote: > > Hi, list! > > > > This is my first time to use UML. However, I met the following problem. > > After compiling the whole uml, I tried to run it

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

2007-10-23 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 WANG Cong wrote: > Hi, list! > > This is my first time to use UML. However, I met the following problem. > After compiling the whole uml, I tried to run it with: > > $ ./linux ubd0=~/Download/Fedora7-x86-root_fs root=/dev/ubd0 > > But it failed a