Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Eugene Kirpichov wrote: > So far we seem to have unanimous consensus in favor of dropping Java7, and > we seem to also be converging on declaring that this doesn't require > increasing major version - but the discussion has been going on

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

So far we seem to have unanimous consensus in favor of dropping Java7, and we seem to also be converging on declaring that this doesn't require increasing major version - but the discussion has been going on for only a couple of days and we might not have reached some users. Robert - I think it's

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

On Oct 18, 2017 3:25 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: What happens for the users using spark 1.5 that run with Java 7 only ? One of the goals of this thread is to tease out such users if any. To reach a wider audience, maybe the next set of release notes could mention that

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 On 18 October 2017 at 16:00, Ismaël Mejía wrote: > Small correction EOL of Java 8 is Sep. 2018 not Mar. 2018. > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html > > JB the goal of this thread is to get an opinion from the users of all > the runners on their

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

Small correction EOL of Java 8 is Sep. 2018 not Mar. 2018. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html JB the goal of this thread is to get an opinion from the users of all the runners on their opinions/constraints, but we have to reach some consensus and deal with the tradeoffs of

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 - Srinivas - Typed on tiny keys. pls ignore typos.{mobile app} On 17-Oct-2017 9:47 PM, "Ismaël Mejía" wrote: > We have discussed recently in the developer mailing list about the > idea of removing support for Java 7 on Beam. There are multiple > reasons for this: > > -

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

What happens for the users using spark 1.5 that run with Java 7 only ? On Oct 18, 2017, 12:06, at 12:06, "Ismaël Mejía" wrote: >+1 > >I forgot to vote yesterday, I don't really think this is a change >worth requiring a major version of Beam. Just clear information in the

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 I forgot to vote yesterday, I don't really think this is a change worth requiring a major version of Beam. Just clear information in the site/release notes should make it. Also I am afraid that if we wait until we have enough changes to switch Beam to a new major version the switch to Java 8

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 On 18 October 2017 at 05:16, Griselda Cuevas wrote: > +1 > > On 17 October 2017 at 16:36, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >> +1 to removing Java 7 support, pending no major user outcry to the >> contrary. >> >> In terms of versioning, I fall into the camp that

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 On 17 October 2017 at 16:36, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > +1 to removing Java 7 support, pending no major user outcry to the > contrary. > > In terms of versioning, I fall into the camp that this isn't > sufficiently incompatible to warrant a major version increase. >

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 to removing Java 7 support. In terms of release 3.0, we can handle this two ways: - Wait until enough other potentially incompatible changes accumulate, do all of them, and call it a "3.0" release, so that 3.0 will truly differ in a lot of incompatible and hopefully nice ways from 2.x. This

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:21 PM Raghu Angadi wrote: > +1. > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:11 PM, David McNeill > wrote: > >> The final version of Beam that supports Java 7 should be clearly stated >> in the docs, so those stuck on old production

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:11 PM, David McNeill wrote: > The final version of Beam that supports Java 7 should be clearly stated in > the docs, so those stuck on old production infrastructure for other java > app dependencies know where to stop upgrading. > > David

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

The final version of Beam that supports Java 7 should be clearly stated in the docs, so those stuck on old production infrastructure for other java app dependencies know where to stop upgrading. David McNeill 021 721 015 On 18 October 2017 at 05:16, Ismaël Mejía wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 (snip): So, please vote: +1 Yes, go ahead and move Beam support to Java 8.   0 Do whatever you want. I don’t have a preference. -1 Please keep Java 7 compatibility (if possible add your argument to keep supporting for Java 7).

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Thomas Groh wrote: > I'm pretty strongly in favor of phasing out Java7 support, especially > given that it was EoL'd more than two years ago. However, I'm not sure how > this interacts with the repository's backwards-compatibility guarantees

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Henning Rohde wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> However, it's good to target this for Beam 3.0.0 as it can have an impact >> especially for runners. >> >> Regards >> JB

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM Steve Anderson wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 17, 2017, at 09:31, Aleksandr wrote: > > +1 > > 17. okt 2017 7:17 PM kirjutas kuupäeval "Ismaël Mejía" >: > > We have discussed

Re: [VOTE] [DISCUSSION] Remove support for Java 7

+1 17. okt 2017 7:17 PM kirjutas kuupäeval "Ismaël Mejía" : We have discussed recently in the developer mailing list about the idea of removing support for Java 7 on Beam. There are multiple reasons for this: - Java 7 has not received public updates for almost two years and