+1

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Henning Rohde <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> However, it's good to target this for Beam 3.0.0 as it can have an impact
>> especially for runners.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 10/17/2017 06:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from a general purpose.
>>>
>>> +0 from a runner perspective (as it depends of the execution engine).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/17/2017 06:16 PM, Ismaël Mejía wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have discussed recently in the developer mailing list about the
>>>> idea of removing support for Java 7 on Beam. There are multiple
>>>> reasons for this:
>>>>
>>>> - Java 7 has not received public updates for almost two years and most
>>>> companies are moving / have already moved to Java 8.
>>>> - A good amount of the systems Beam users rely on have decided to drop
>>>> Java 7 support, e.g. Spark, Flink, Elasticsearch, even Hadoop plans to
>>>> do it on version 3.
>>>> - Most Big data distributions and Cloud managed Spark/Hadoop services
>>>> have already moved to Java 8.
>>>> - Recent versions of core libraries Beam uses are moving to be Java 8
>>>> only (or mostly), e.g. Guava, Google Auto, etc.
>>>> - Java 8 has some nice features that can make Beam code nicer e.g.
>>>> lambdas, streams.
>>>>
>>>> Considering that Beam is a ‘recent’ project we expect users to be
>>>> already using Java 8. However we wanted first to ask the opinion of
>>>> the Beam users on this subject. It could be the case that some of the
>>>> users are still dealing with some old cluster running on Java 7 or
>>>> have another argument to keep the Java 7 compatibility.
>>>>
>>>> So, please vote:
>>>> +1 Yes, go ahead and move Beam support to Java 8.
>>>>   0 Do whatever you want. I don’t have a preference.
>>>> -1 Please keep Java 7 compatibility (if possible add your argument to
>>>> keep supporting for Java 7).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [email protected]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>

Reply via email to