to, when 2 were required to guarantee consistency. The intent to do
a quorum write is not the same as actually doing one.
--
Derek Williams
looked into it too much, but I
think forcing a major compaction when using leveled strategy doesn't have
the same effect as with size tiered.
--
Derek Williams
--
Tyler Hobbs
DataStax http://datastax.com/
--
Derek Williams
))
Probably more efficient but generally page numbers go backwards ie page 1
has newest content so this would complicate things when writing data and
cause load if logic was included to reorganise page numbers etc.
Cheers
Sam
http://Newsarc.net
--
Derek Williams
)
and at the DataStax 1.2 docs.
As for why I'd want such a thing, I just wanted to initialize some test
values for a blob column with cqlsh.
Thanks!
--
Derek Williams
** **
** **
** **
** **
--
Derek Williams
signature-logo29.pngsignature-best-employer-logo4823.png
, Derek Williams de...@fyrie.net wrote:
When you ran this test, is that the exact schema you used? I'm not
seeing where you are setting gc_grace to 0 (although I could just be blind,
it happens).
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Bryan Talbot btal...@aeriagames.comwrote:
I'm able to reproduce
0 0
--
Derek Williams
finishes. We only have one CF and
right now the number of SSTable is around 15000, write latency is still
under 0.1ms.
Anything needs to be concerned? Or anything I can do to reduce the number
of pending compaction?
Thanks.
-Wei
--
Derek Williams
are you using?
For now, we had ot add all nodes ot the seeds list instead so it
distributes amongst all nodes.
Thanks,
Dean
--
Derek Williams
at 400K? Maybe try that first.
Thanks.
-Wei
- Original Message -
From: Derek Williams de...@fyrie.net
To: user@cassandra.apache.org, Wei Zhu wz1...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:06:00 PM
Subject: Re: Cassandra pending compaction tasks keeps increasing
Increasing
On 29/01/2013, at 8:59 AM, Derek Williams de...@fyrie.net wrote:
I could be wrong about this, but when repair is run, it isn't just values
that are streamed between nodes, it's entire sstables. This causes a lot of
duplicate data to be written which was already correct on the node, which
, but RF:3 is not acceptable for us.
Can we force somehow cassandra not to lookup keys in remote CD?
Thanks for your answers!
--
Derek Williams
behavior for the get_slice requests. This is
observed throughout the log.
** **
Thanks much
** **
** **
** **
--
Derek Williams
...@genesyslab.comwrote:
Further information, in AZ1, when 143, 145, and 146 are up, all goes
well. But when, say 143, fails, the client receives a TIMEOUT failure –
even though 145 and 146 are up.
** **
*From:* Derek Williams [mailto:de...@fyrie.net]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:50 AM
in Cassandra and the table in MySQL,and I
find the processing time of MySQL is better than Cassandra.
So,I wander what are the advantages of Cassandra compare MySQL and how to
improve the performance of Cassandra.
Is this the right way to use Cassandra.
--
Derek Williams
support.
My only other wishlist item is the ability to set the timestamp, ttl, and
consistency level using prepared statements.
--
Derek Williams
or written to be relied upon by any person as advice. Moon Capital does not
waive confidentiality or privilege as a result of this email.
--
Derek Williams
this way as it is more predictable, but of
course others will have a different opinion.
--
Derek Williams
partitioner to store the rows in order, but that is not
recommended because you wont get even distribution throughout our cluster.
I think your best bet though is just use the master_id for your row key,
and then use composite columns that begin with the client_id.
--
Derek Williams
.
See my earlier post on the subject:
http://www.mail-archive.com/user@cassandra.apache.org/msg23160.html
You can have a dynamic table with CQL3, you just can't have a table with a
mix of dynamic/nondynamic columns.
--
Derek Williams
a table with
even more rows; I wanted wide rows so the reads and writes would be more
efficient.
** **
*From:* Derek Williams [mailto:de...@fyrie.net]
*Sent:* Friday, July 06, 2012 4:58 PM
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Dynamic CF
** **
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2
To clarify, I haven't tested it with compact storage, but it will only use
the first part of the primary key without compact storage.
On Jul 6, 2012 4:50 PM, Derek Williams de...@fyrie.net wrote:
Actually, my solution only makes a row for each unique value of the first
part of the primary key
just contains server classes. Everything you need
should be in org.apache.cassandra.thrift.
To use cql3 I just use the client methods 'execute_cql_query',
'prepare_cql_query' and 'execute_prepared_cql_query', after setting cql
version to '3.0.0'.
--
Derek Williams
, then it wont be deleted.
More info here: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/DistributedDeletes
--
Derek Williams
--
Derek Williams
a driver that with multiplex *should be* faster
in *some* cases. However I have never seen any evidence to back up this
theory anecdotal or otherwise.
In fact
https://github.com/pchalamet/cassandra-sharp/pull/24
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Derek Williams de...@fyrie.net wrote:
The binary
@cassandra.apache.org
Date: Sunday, May 5, 2013 5:27 PM
To: cassandra users user@cassandra.apache.orgmailto:
user@cassandra.apache.orgmailto:user@cassandra.apache.orgmailto:
user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: hector or astyanax
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Derek Williams de...@fyrie.netmailto
%
113427455640312821154458202477256070485
1.1.1.6 eu-west 1c Up Normal 75.39 GB 16.67%
141784319550391026443072753096570088105
What am I missing here?
TIA,
Katriel
--
Derek Williams
29 matches
Mail list logo
