There are many YCSB forks on github that get optimized for specific
databases but the default one is decent across the defaults. Cassandra
has it's own internal stress tool that we like better.
The short comings are that generic tools and generic workloads are
generic and thus not real-world. But
I agree with Edward. We always develop our own stress tool that tests each
use case of interest. Every use case is different in certain ways that can
only be tested using custom stress tool.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
There are many YCSB forks
@cassandra.apache.org
user@cassandra.apache.orgmailto:user@cassandra.apache.org
To: user@cassandra.apache.orgmailto:user@cassandra.apache.org
user@cassandra.apache.orgmailto:user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Decision Making- YCSB
I agree with Edward. We always develop our own stress tool
Hi Folks,
I'm coming up with a set of decision criteria on when to chose traditional
RDBMS vs various NoSQL options.
So one aspect is the application requirements around Consistency,
Availability, Partition Tolerance, Scalability, Data Modeling etc. These can be
decided at a theoretical
