Hi,
I am trying to store Ignite Audit logs into a separate file.
I have followed below steps.
I have created a log4j2.xml with console and file
Mike,
Could you show the code, that you use to register the continuous query?
Maybe there is some misconfiguration?
Denis
пн, 20 мая 2019 г. в 17:47, Mike Needham :
> Hi All,
>
> I have a cache that is running and is defined as
> IgniteCache exchCache =
>
Hi,
In case you're going to use log4j2 as gridLogger for Ignite you should add
"ignite-log4j2" dependency and set up Log4J2Logger as described here:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/logging#section-log4j2
Or in case you just want to use "Audit-logs" logger independently, you
should create
Hello!
I imagine that maybe datagrip will only fetch a single page and not proceed
further, hence the difference?
Can you add e.g. LIMIT 10; to this statement, see if it makes a difference?
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
вт, 21 мая 2019 г. в 20:38, yann.blaz...@externe.bnpparibas.com <
Hello!
We recommend using SSD and not HDD with Ignite. Otherwise, try to increase
size of Checkpoint Page Buffer - if you run out of this buffer, all
activity will stop until checkpoint is finished. Maybe you also need to
decrease time between checkpoints.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
вт, 7
Vishalan,
Please create a new thread and provide information about your setup and
logs.
The OP doesn't seem to be getting your questions.
Denis
пн, 20 мая 2019 г. в 12:44, Vishalan :
> What was the solution to above problem.I am facing the same issue
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
Hi ,
We are working on ignite on Kubernetes environment and using
Ignite-web-console for querying. When we ran security scan on Ignite web
console there are some security issues reported by the scans. Below are the
issues. All the below issue are reported as HIGH severity.
Could you please let
Hi All,
While going through Apache-Ignite's PartitionLossPolicy : IGNORE, the
default one for which I found 2 explanation and having some doubt about
these.
As per API doc:
https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/cache/PartitionLossPolicy.html
If partition is lost,
private const string CacheName = "EXCHANGE";
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (var ignite =
Ignition.Start("E:\\ignite\\apache-ignite-2.7.0-src\\examples\\config\\example-igniteClient.xml"))
{
{
var cacheCfg = new
Hi Ilya,
Looking at the logs, every time checkpoint starts due to
‘timeout’ reason not because the buffer is full. So still do we need to
increase checkpointing buffer or only changing checkpointing frequency will
help ?
Thanks and Regards,
Kamlesh Joshi
From: Ilya Kasnacheev
Hi, I need to manage a large fleet of servers (around 100k machines). Each
node contains a subset of the data (basically binary blobs) in memory. The
data store is a separate database.
I am trying to provide a binary blob lookup service (in greatly simplified
terms). For each incoming request
Hi,
Looks like next part is missing for IGNORE policy description in readme.io
documentation:
"The result of reading from a lost partition is undefined and may be
different on different nodes in the cluster."
There is no guarantee for IGNORE policy that reading from the lost partition
will
Hello!
Do you have reproducer for this behavior? Have you tried the same scenario
on 2.7? I doubt anyone will take effort to debug 2.6.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
чт, 25 апр. 2019 г. в 18:59, kimec.ethome.sk :
> Greetings,
>
> we've been chasing a weird issue in a two node cluster for few
Is it possible to call invokeAsync() with OPTIMISTIC SERIALIZABLE isolation?
What are the transactional guarantees when using invokeAsync()?
Thanks!
Kamil
Hello!
It seems that we always report SQL for two-step queries (i.e. ones which
are not simply look up by key).
I think you need to live with that, however you can try and file an issue
against JIRA. I doubt it will get much traction since everyone seems to be
using JDBC anyway.
Regards,
--
Hello!
If it is 'timeout' then it is likely not the reason of your issues.
What is your walMode? Is it LOG_ONLY? If it's not, try to use LOG_ONLY here.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 22 мая 2019 г. в 16:30, Kamlesh Joshi :
> Hi Ilya,
>
>
>
> Looking at the logs, every time
Hello!
Only thing I can think of that maybe you're not releasing your connections
properly, end up using same connection from two threads at the same time.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
вт, 7 мая 2019 г. в 07:03, yangjiajun <1371549...@qq.com>:
> Hello.
>
> I use jdbc thin connections.I also
Thank you Igor for the quick response.
Shall we expect this to be corrected in redame.io doc to make it consistent
with API doc and avoid the confusion ?
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi Ropugg,
If these 2 machines' spec are the same, please check whether they are
running at the same performance mode (for Linux version 2.6.32).
Also, if they are HTTP servers, please check whether the requests are
balanced.
Typically, sar command will help.
(sar -w; sar -u; sar -q ; sar -n
6 CPU
processor : 5
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz
stepping: 2
microcode : 1808
cpu MHz : 2700.000
cache size : 20480 KB
physical id : 10
siblings: 1
Hi Igor ,
I am using log4j2 for the logs and I have done configuration mentioned in
the below link
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/logging#section-log4j2
Now am trying to use gridLogger in my code.
How to use gridLogger to create log object in my code with separate log
file.
Trying to
Hi,
Ignite can go so far in meeting your requirements for durable storage and
retrieval, but a primary node failure is probably going to be terminal because
unless you can boot a machine in less than 5 seconds you can forget about
reloading ignite anyway, you simply won't be able to restore
Hi Ropugg,
If these 2 machines' spec are the same, please check whether they are
running at the same performance mode (for Linux version 2.6.32).
Also, if they are HTTP servers, please check whether the requests are
balanced.
Typically, sar command will help.
(sar -w; sar -u; sar -q ; sar -n
6 CPU
processor : 5
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz
stepping: 2
microcode : 1808
cpu MHz : 2700.000
cache size : 20480 KB
physical id : 10
siblings: 1
Hi, when we use ignite getOrCreateNearCache().withExpirePolicy()
Will the expire policy be set on the underlying cache or the near cache?
25 matches
Mail list logo