Re: IO implications of ScanQuery

2018-10-22 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
is ‘yes’  > . > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond. > > > > *From:* Ilya Kasnacheev > *Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2018 11:06 PM > *To:* user@ignite.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: IO implications of ScanQuery > > > > Hello! > > > > As far as my und

RE: IO implications of ScanQuery

2018-10-18 Thread Raymond Wilson
@ignite.apache.org *Subject:* Re: IO implications of ScanQuery Hello! As far as my understanding goes, Keys are stored alongside Values in Durable Memory pages, and they are likely both pulled from pages on scan query. This means the latter explanation is closer to reality. Regards

Re: IO implications of ScanQuery

2018-10-18 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! As far as my understanding goes, Keys are stored alongside Values in Durable Memory pages, and they are likely both pulled from pages on scan query. This means the latter explanation is closer to reality. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 17 окт. 2018 г. в 23:05, Raymond Wilson : > I

IO implications of ScanQuery

2018-10-17 Thread Raymond Wilson
I have a potential work flow where I may need to find a set of elements in a cache where the values are not be small (1-100Kb say), and where the numbers of elements in the cache may be large (many millions). Each key contains fields the scan query could use to select the entries I want.