I resolved the issue that was causing the misleading display but I’ll spend a
little time to see if I can recreate it. No promises but I’ll try.
From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:gno...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:43 PM
To: user
Subject: Re: scr:details command
Could you
at how a mandatory reference be unbound but still be
> satisfied? Hmmm.*
>
>
>
> *From:* David Jencks [mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:05 AM
> *To:* user@karaf.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: scr:details command
>
>
>
> either
: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:05 AM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: scr:details command
either
- minimum cardinality 0, so it’s always satisfied
- the component is not satisfied for some other reason so nothing is bound to
any reference.
I think this is the karaf scr command so I might
either
- minimum cardinality 0, so it’s always satisfied
- the component is not satisfied for some other reason so nothing is bound to
any reference.
I think this is the karaf scr command so I might be wrong about the meaning.
david jencks
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Leschke, Scott wrote:
>
