RE: scr:details command
I resolved the issue that was causing the misleading display but I’ll spend a little time to see if I can recreate it. No promises but I’ll try. From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:gno...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:43 PM To: user Subject: Re: scr:details command Could you provide the full command output please ? 2016-09-20 18:13 GMT+02:00 Leschke, Scott mailto:slesc...@medline.com>>: This is the Karaf scr:details command. It also says that the reference is mandatory (Optional : mandatory) and scr:info says Cardinality: 1..1. So I guess I’m still at how a mandatory reference be unbound but still be satisfied? Hmmm. From: David Jencks [mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com<mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com>] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:05 AM To: user@karaf.apache.org<mailto:user@karaf.apache.org> Subject: Re: scr:details command either - minimum cardinality 0, so it’s always satisfied - the component is not satisfied for some other reason so nothing is bound to any reference. I think this is the karaf scr command so I might be wrong about the meaning. david jencks On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Leschke, Scott mailto:slesc...@medline.com>> wrote: I’m confused. What does it mean if scr:details says: State : satisfied Service Reference : No Services bound How can a reference be satisfied if it’s not bound? -- Guillaume Nodet Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com<mailto:gno...@redhat.com> Web: http://fusesource.com<http://fusesource.com/> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: scr:details command
Could you provide the full command output please ? 2016-09-20 18:13 GMT+02:00 Leschke, Scott : > *This is the Karaf scr:details command. It also says that the reference > is mandatory (Optional : mandatory) and scr:info says Cardinality: 1..1.* > > > > *So I guess I’m still at how a mandatory reference be unbound but still be > satisfied? Hmmm.* > > > > *From:* David Jencks [mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:05 AM > *To:* user@karaf.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: scr:details command > > > > either > > - minimum cardinality 0, so it’s always satisfied > > - the component is not satisfied for some other reason so nothing is bound > to any reference. > > > > I think this is the karaf scr command so I might be wrong about the > meaning. > > > > david jencks > > > > On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Leschke, Scott wrote: > > > > I’m confused. What does it mean if scr:details says: > > > > State : satisfied > > Service Reference : No Services bound > > > > How can a reference be satisfied if it’s not bound? > > > -- Guillaume Nodet Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
RE: scr:details command
This is the Karaf scr:details command. It also says that the reference is mandatory (Optional : mandatory) and scr:info says Cardinality: 1..1. So I guess I’m still at how a mandatory reference be unbound but still be satisfied? Hmmm. From: David Jencks [mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:05 AM To: user@karaf.apache.org Subject: Re: scr:details command either - minimum cardinality 0, so it’s always satisfied - the component is not satisfied for some other reason so nothing is bound to any reference. I think this is the karaf scr command so I might be wrong about the meaning. david jencks On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Leschke, Scott mailto:slesc...@medline.com>> wrote: I’m confused. What does it mean if scr:details says: State : satisfied Service Reference : No Services bound How can a reference be satisfied if it’s not bound?
Re: scr:details command
either - minimum cardinality 0, so it’s always satisfied - the component is not satisfied for some other reason so nothing is bound to any reference. I think this is the karaf scr command so I might be wrong about the meaning. david jencks > On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Leschke, Scott wrote: > > I’m confused. What does it mean if scr:details says: > > State : satisfied > Service Reference : No Services bound > > How can a reference be satisfied if it’s not bound?
