then you'll be able to assign tasks.
>
> cheers,
> /J
>
>
> - Original message -
> From: kant kodali
> To: user@mesos.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Rukletsov , user@mesos.apache.org, Joseph
> Wu , Dario Rexin , Avinash
> Sridharan , Jay JN Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN
&
inash Sridharan , Jay JN Guo/China/IBM@IBMCNSubject: Re: what is the status on this?Date: Sat, Sep 24, 2016 5:13 AM
@Joseph Wu: I am ready. Please add me on gchat kanth...@gmail.com and you guys can ping me an
r
Cc: Jay JN Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN
Subject: Re: what is the status on this?
Date: Sun, Sep 4, 2016 6:10 PM
Jay has some patches for de-couple Mesos with Zookeeper
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5828
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5829I think it should be possible to
support c
d see for now is that Consul does not
>> support `POST` with incremental key index. We may need to leverage
>> `?cas=` operation in Consul to emulate the behaviour of joining a
>> key group.
>>
>> We could have a discussion on how to implement Consul HA module.
>>
dex. We may need to leverage `?cas=` operation in
Consul to emulate the behaviour of joining a key group.We could have a
discussion on how to implement Consul HA module.cheers,/J- Original message
-
From: haosdent
To: user
Cc: Jay JN Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN
Subject: Re: what is the status on t
could actually reuse our Etcd module
>>>>>> implementation once we manage to push the module into Mesos community.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only technical problem I could see for now is that Consul does not
>>>>>> support `POST` with in
module into Mesos community.
>>>>
>>>> The only technical problem I could see for now is that Consul does not
>>>> support `POST` with incremental key index. We may need to leverage
>>>> `?cas=` operation in Consul to emulate the behaviour of joining
gt; `?cas=` operation in Consul to emulate the behaviour of joining a
>>> key group.
>>>
>>> We could have a discussion on how to implement Consul HA module.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> /J
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original message -
>>
key index. We may need to leverage
>> `?cas=` operation in Consul to emulate the behaviour of joining a
>> key group.
>>
>> We could have a discussion on how to implement Consul HA module.
>>
>> cheers,
>> /J
>>
>>
>> - Original message
> support `POST` with incremental key index. We may need to leverage
>> `?cas=` operation in Consul to emulate the behaviour of joining a key
>> group.
>>
>> We could have a discussion on how to implement Consul HA module.
>>
>> cheers,
>> /J
>>
Original message -
> From: haosdent
> To: user
> Cc: Jay JN Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN
> Subject: Re: what is the status on this?
> Date: Sun, Sep 4, 2016 6:10 PM
>
> Jay has some patches for de-couple Mesos with Zookeeper
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5828
,
/J
- Original message -From: haosdent To: user Cc: Jay JN Guo/China/IBM@IBMCNSubject: Re: what is the status on this?Date: Sun, Sep 4, 2016 6:10 PM
Jay has some patches for de-couple Mesos with Zookeeper
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5828https://issues.apache.org/jira
Jay has some patches for de-couple Mesos with Zookeeper
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5828
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5829
I think it should be possible to support consul by custom modules after
jay's work done.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 6:02 PM, kant kodali wrote:
Hi Alex,
We have some experienced devops people here and they all had one thing in common
which is Zookeeper is a pain to maintain. In fact we refused to bring in new
tech stacks that require Zookeeper such as Kafka for example. so we desperately
in search for alternative preferably using consul. I
Kant—
mind telling us what is your use case and why this ticket is important for
you? It will help us prioritize work.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:46 AM, tommy xiao wrote:
> Hi guys, i always focus on t his case. but good news is etcd always have
> patchs. so the coming consul is very easy, just
Hi guys, i always focus on t his case. but good news is etcd always have
patchs. so the coming consul is very easy, just need some time to do coding
on it. if you have interesting it? let us collaborate it.
2016-08-26 8:11 GMT+08:00 Joseph Wu :
> There is no timeline as no one has done any work o
There is no timeline as no one has done any work on the issue.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, kant kodali wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I see this ticket and other related tickets should be part of sprints in
> 2015 and it is still not resolved yet. can we have a timeline on this? This
> would be real
17 matches
Mail list logo