I would start looking at the flow of your content (original fields,
copyField instructions) and at the fields you are actually searching
(df or fl). If you can add 'echoParams=all' to both queries and see
the difference, it may help a lot.
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ -
Does splainer.io against the two reveal any differences ?
Tom
On 08/02/17 14:54, Chip Calhoun wrote:
I'm testing a new setup, Solr 5.5.3 indexed from Nutch 1.12. I'm comparing it
against my production instance, Solr 3.3.0 and Nutch 1.4. The new search misses
some results that the old one
I'm testing a new setup, Solr 5.5.3 indexed from Nutch 1.12. I'm comparing it
against my production instance, Solr 3.3.0 and Nutch 1.4. The new search misses
some results that the old one got.
If I search for the word "optician", the old results include a result which the
new one misses. The
Markus,
The example URLs I sent are all the same IP address. This isn't always the
case, however, so you're correct that partitioning by IP won't help us.
Additionally, we'd like to avoid resolving the IPs of these domains in the
first place since most of them resolve to the same IP.
We're
Dear Apache Enthusiast,
This is your FINAL reminder that the Call for Papers (CFP) for ApacheCon
Miami is closing this weekend - February 11th. This is your final
opportunity to submit a talk for consideration at this event.
This year, we are running several mini conferences in conjunction with
Hi,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2357
thanks!
> There are some plugins that add fields to doc that will be indexed, but i
> can't find one place
that describe every fields that nutch send to index.
conf/schema.xml
- should list all fields filled by core or any of the
6 matches
Mail list logo
