-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
McClanahan
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 6:18 AM
To: user@shale.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MyFaces
PS: I feel the need to add a personal note here, just so everyone is
aware
ottobre 2007 21.15
To: 'user@shale.apache.org'
Subject: AW: MyFaces
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
von Craig
McClanahan
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2007 12:18
An: user@shale.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: MyFaces
I quite like this idea. This would eliminate duplication but the biggest
advantage I see for project Shale is opportunity to get into the
mainstream.
Kailas
-Original Message-
From: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 October 2007 22:12
To: user@shale.apache.org; [EMAIL
I quite like this idea. This would eliminate duplication but the biggest
advantage I see for project Shale is opportunity to get into the
mainstream.
Kailas
-Original Message-
From: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 October 2007 22:12
To: user@shale.apache.org; [EMAIL
thx for your answers - i think i am going to evaluate 1.0.4 and its new
dialog implementation.
Torsten
Am Dienstag, den 24.10.2006, 01:48 -0400 schrieb Rahul Akolkar:
On 10/23/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/06, Torsten Krah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Btw ist
On 10/23/06, Torsten Krah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this possible, or not needed when using the upcoming dialog2?
This is definitely something we should test, but I would not anticipate any
problems.
On the other hand, I have a nontrivial amount of discomfort with the fact
that
On 10/23/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/06, Torsten Krah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Btw ist 1.0.4 usable, especially the scxml dialog2?
From an API perspective, I think we're done (although a bit more testing
around browser navigation buttons is still needed).
