On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 14:16 -0500, jzh...@ximpleware.com wrote:
> I think vtd-xml is quite comparable to xml bean,...
Looking at the vtd-xml web site on sourceforge, I am struggling to see
much similarity with XMLBeans beyond the superficial one that they both
operate on XML-format data. From my p
Peter Keller is correct, VTD is no substitute for XMLBeans. I would class the
email suggesting that it was as spam.
The next best approach, if XMLBeans is not an option, would be JAXB. But JAXB
is nothing like XMLBeans so I would not call JAXB an equivalent, just a
substitute.
-=bill staffor
2013/7/23 Bill Stafford
> Peter Keller is correct, VTD is no substitute for XMLBeans. I would class
> the email suggesting that it was as spam.
>
> The next best approach, if XMLBeans is not an option, would be JAXB. But
> JAXB is nothing like XMLBeans so I would not call JAXB an equivalent
We're using XmlBeans in several of our projects and haven't found
anything else out there that does the job like it, particularly when it
comes to dealing with substitution groups and other advanced schema
features. Would very much like to see this stay out of the attic!
best
*P
On 7/23/13 3:26 PM
Hi all,
I have been working for a Charity for the last 5 years, and we are using
XMLBeans for Marshalling web service calls to Java with Spring-ws.
These has been a very successful approach and have had no real issues with
it. I know it counts for little, but It would be a massive shame if the
p
Hi list,
I am a long-time user of XMLBeans, most of the time as part of the
BPELUnit project. There is no replacement to XMLBeans because in
contrast to JAXB if preserves namespace declarations so you e.g. read
and write XML document that contain XPath expressions (e.g. BPEL, BPMN2,
...).
A
6 matches
Mail list logo
