Just to be sure, I downloaded and decompiled
org.apache.activemq:artemis-jakarta-client:2.18.0 and the
org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQConnectionFactory *does*
return an instance of
org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQConnection that implements
jakarta.jms.Connection.
Yes, artemis-jakarta-client version 2.18.0
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:11 PM Domenico Francesco Bruscino <
bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> are you using `artemis-jakarta-client` [1]?
>
> [1]
>
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/artemis-jakarta-client
>
> Regards,
Hey all!
I swear I've found page on https://activemq.apache.org/ or else where
that describes how the message id is generated in ActiveMQ (Classic, but
Artemis might use the same code?) but I can't find it anymore.
BR,
- Simon
Hi,
We notice an issue recently in production where the messages in queue size
grows disproportionate to the number of messages actually produced.
Queue size grows close to 3 million in about 3 days while the actual messages
produced are way less than the actual queue size.
Here is one
Hi Jack,
are you using `artemis-jakarta-client` [1]?
[1]
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/artemis-jakarta-client
Regards,
Domenico
On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 13:36, Jack Shirazi
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to have a fully EE9 (so only using jakarta.jms* imports)
>
Hi,
I'm trying to have a fully EE9 (so only using jakarta.jms* imports)
implementation. jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory is not compatible
with ActiveMQConnectionFactory as that returns a
javax.jms.ConnectionFactory. I couldn't see an alternative connection
factory that provides a
