Filtrering issue when header is missing

Hi, I’m not sure if I have discovered a bug in Artemis (2.31.2) or if I have misunderstood something. I used the following command to create a new instance: apache-artemis-2.31.2/bin/artemis create --user admin --password admin --no-autocreate --require-login myBroker I have added the

Connectivity problems

Hi, We are replacing an old (5.9) remote ActiveMQ Classic broker with a remote Artemis broker and have a few questions. 1. The Artemis broker is configured to persist messages in a database. Does e.g. and have any effect at all when using a database? Which configurations are not relevant

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

Hi, Many unexpected things occured today but I managed to perform a very quick test. I replaced the ra.xml only since I use a remote broker. I deployed the modified activemq-rar.rar on a Wildfly 29 without any problems. I also deployed a MDB which was able to consume a message from a queue on

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

Thanks for the response. I'll try to test with the suggested ra.xml tomorrow. Regards, Calle

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

Hi, Should it be possible to use any of the new resource adapters activemq-rar-5.18.3.rar or activemq-rar-6.0.0.rar on a Jakarta EE 10 server? I did a simple test by placing the files in the deployments directory on a Wildfly 28 server (since that is how the resource adapter is deployed on my

Re: Replacing composite queues with Artemis

Thanks for your suggestion and the comment regarding send-to-dla-on-no-route. I will probably use your approach. However, I did try to do a little adjustment by defining the DLQ address like this (since that appears to be similar to how auto-create-dead-letter-resources creates queues when set

Re: Questions regarding auto-creation

I finally managed to understand why I got the problems described earlier. The "producer" uses "artemis-jms" while the deployed MDB uses "artemis-ra". Both components uses org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ClientSessionImpl.createQueue(…). However, "artemis-ra" tries to create the

Re: Replacing composite queues with Artemis

Is there anyone who got any thoughts regarding the described behavior? Or is there anyone who has made a similar migration and want to share some suggestions? Regards, Calle Från: Calle Andersson Skickat: måndag, oktober 16, 2023 10:42:33 PM Till: users

Replacing composite queues with Artemis

I have an old A-MQ with a lot of composite queues, e.g: Currently, I'm investigating how to migrate to Artemis. The implementations of the existing clients (which sends and receives messages) should not be adjusted (i.e. the names of the queues should be the same and the clients should

Re: Questions regarding auto-creation

I tried to deploy a MDB to a Wildfly 28 server but I still get the same problems (however, the logging looks a little bit different on this server). This was added to standalone-full.xml: ...

Re: Questions regarding auto-creation

Thanks for the reply, However, I had alread added it to my acceptor before my failing attempts:

Re: Questions regarding auto-creation

Thanks for the reply, I'm using ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 as well. Thanks for the suggestion on using the "consumer" and "producer" commands (I didn't know of them). However, when using the commands everything worked as expected (using my intended Artemis configuration). I assume my problem

Re: Questions regarding auto-creation

Hi, Is there anyone who could confirm if it is possible to configure Artemis in the same way as I explained in my previous mail or if I have misunderstood the whole things. Thanks in advance, Calle Från: Calle Andersson Skickat: torsdag, oktober 5, 2023 1:55

Questions regarding auto-creation

Hi, I've just started to investigate how Artemis works and I have some questions regarding auto-creation of addresses/queues. I don't want to allow any clients/servers (who sends and/or consumes messages) to be able to auto-create addresses or queues. However, I want the broker to be able to

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

for Jakarta EE 10 servers Hi Calle- The nextrelease of ActiveMQ 5.x will have full jakarta support, including the resource adapter. Stay tuned. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 15, 2023, at 3:32 AM, Calle Andersson > wrote: > > I have an application which currently communicates with a

Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

I have an application which currently communicates with an old remote ActiveMQ “Classic” 5.9 using the resource adapter (activemq-rar.rar). I need to migrate the application to an Jakarta EE 10 server (Wildfly) but the resource adapter doesn’t seem to work on that server. Which options do I