Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread Justin Bertram
> -Original Message- > From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > Looking back through the ema

Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread Robbie Gemmell
5.16.5 > > -Original Message- > From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > Looking back through the

RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
5.16.5 -Original Message- From: Justin Bertram Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ Looking back through the email thread I don't see a clear

Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread Justin Bertram
From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configuration file? &

RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
Configuration file -Original Message- From: Justin Bertram Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ Are you asking about the logs themselves

Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread Justin Bertram
stin Bertram > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > No. As the website [1] states: > > Java compatibility: 11+ > > The lat

RE: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-15 Thread ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4? -Original Message- From: Justin Bertram Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

Re: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-14 Thread Justin Bertram
No. As the website [1] states: Java compatibility: 11+ The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6. Justin [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/ On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC wrote: > Can I continue to use

RE: Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-03-14 Thread ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4? On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote: > Hello Jana- > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to the recent > generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important thing is to use > latest releases to

Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-02-22 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello Jana- Yes, JDK’s from those vendors should work. Please refer to my previous email for notes on JDK + ActiveMQ version alignment as well as testing. Let us know what you end up using and how it goes! Thanks, -Matt > On Feb 22, 2023, at 12:08 PM, Jana Manju wrote: > > Thanks for your

Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-02-22 Thread Jana Manju
Thanks for your reply Matt, I am looking for input if I can use the following open source third party JDK as an alternative to Licensed Oracle Java for my activeMQ to work? * Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK Adoptium Eclipse Temurin Azul Java* On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 03:09, Matt Pavlovich wrote:

Re: Query on OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ

2023-02-22 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello Jana- As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to the recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important thing is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially security. JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a few days, as