Re: issues with AMQ failover configuration

2022-10-14 Thread James McCullough
thank you-- will advise On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:03 PM Tetreault, Lucas wrote: > Hey James, > > For what it's worth... You can continue using static:(failover:(uri1, > uri2)) with the addition of the following query params > "?randomize=false=0" which is functionally equivalent > to the

Re: issues with AMQ failover configuration

2022-10-12 Thread Tetreault, Lucas
Hey James, For what it's worth... You can continue using static:(failover:(uri1, uri2)) with the addition of the following query params "?randomize=false=0" which is functionally equivalent to the "masterslave" protocol, e.g.: static:(failover:(uri1,uri1)?randomize=false=0) I have an

Re: issues with AMQ failover configuration

2022-10-12 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hello James- First thing— You have an inconsistent url — change "static:(failover:” to uri=“masterslave:(tcp://hosta,tcp:hostb )” .. Network Connectors imply failover and retry, and the ‘masterslave’ discovery does a connect HOSTA, then HOSTB convention. -Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 12, 2022,