The veto is for proposing to make new JMS 2.0 methods delegate to 1.1
methods in the client as that behavior is just wrong and makes no sense.
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:55 AM Justin Bertram wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but why not help TomEE move to ActiveMQ Artemis which
> already supports
Pardon my ignorance, but why not help TomEE move to ActiveMQ Artemis which
already supports JMS 2.0? If I recall correctly one of the reasons that the
HornetQ donation was originally accepted was because it provided JMS 2.0
support. This would save work on changes to the 5.x code-base and speed
