unselect patch

I think there's life in AOX still and it's still worth working on. I know working on a project when you don't get a lot of feedback and there are other things in life can make it hard to know if the effort is worthwhile - I think the positive responses are evidence that Arnt and other's work is

Re: on AOX

On 2016/06/13 03:36, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: GP writes: I could help if help is needed to bring the site up to date . It would let people see that project is active and working . Do you care? I don't. My business partners do. I do a little. What we have here is selfhosted mail software.

Re: imap syntax error bad return option status

Axel Rau writes: Arnt did not honor the pull request until now, which may have to do with architectural concerns. Axel's second pull request seems intuitively too complex for the problem... I believe that a solution should not be more complex than the problem, and that PR makes me feel

Re: imap syntax error bad return option status

GP writes: I like your software and it's true that it's gotten into the hosted mail era so it doesn't have the recognition it deserves, but never the less it's still very useful to some folks myself included. I apologise if my tone was bad. So thank you for building it, even if it's not

Re: imap syntax error bad return option status

> Am 12.06.2016 um 23:25 schrieb NSS Ltd : > > Admittedly, the website has some things which make it look very dated, > such as references to old version as if they were current and the fact > the last release is from a few years ago. Although the GIT

Re: imap syntax error bad return option status

On 06/13/2016 12:25 AM, NSS Ltd wrote: In short, AOX looks to me like the sort of IMAP server that people should be considering, especially if they want an open source stack and the advantage of database backed storage on a database which can scale and supports things like online backup and