I've just build 3.2 on a clean Ubuntu 18.4.
Installer (-n) complains like this:
Archiveopteryx requires PostgreSQL 9.1.0 or higher (found only 10.3).
Is this trying to tell me:
- it doesn't work on 10.x, or
- the way it does the check is a bit broken
?
OK I could check the latter - but the
On 12/06/2016 08:41, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
However, the number of aox users is now in two digits and probably
dropping, and they all are capable of adding an extension, so IMO it's
fine either way.
That's a shame.
I wonder if it would be worthwhile considering a 'salvage job' to see
what
Thanks - that worked. And in fact 'older 0' gave me just what I wanted
and would probably have worked anyway!
Important user (ie my wife) much happier now.
Undelete seems not to do anything. Happy to do SQL to recover the
messages if necessary.
I have a setup with no retention policies, just the old undelete time:
root@nas:~ # aox show cf undelete-time
undelete-time = 49
root@nas:~ # aox show retention
root@nas:~ #
I look in the
with straight packages, that I'm back on postgresql 9.2.
James
ports.
Hi James,
I'm the FreeBSD maintainer of archiveopteryx. Version 3.2.0 is in
ports, and I already patched around these issues. Is there a reason
you're not using the one in ports?
Probably because I wanted to move beyond what was in ports previously, I
had been using 3.1.8 from git
)
s.append( a.procpid );
else
s.append( a.pid );
My Postgres 9.2.8 pg_stat_activity definitely uses 'pid', not 'procpid'.
James
In the Activity Manager, I have a sequence of warning.
The current operation on 'Holiday' did not succeed. The mail server for
account james@... responded: Mailbox deleted: /users/James/Trash/DFly.
They all reference 'Holiday' and different old contents in Trash.
The timing corresponds
Try this. I'm using Thunderbird as an IMAP client to 3.1.4
Create folders:
foo
foo/baz
bar
bar/baz
Now try to delete the two 'baz' folders.
So far as I can tell, even after you have emptied 'Trash' after the
first 'baz' deletion, there is some lingering db record that prevents
another
On 22/11/2013 09:15, Usman Malik wrote:
Not knowing much about mail protocols, the way I think about solving
attachments (and decoupling it from db) is as following. The approach
is mostly geared towards web-mail services and is most likely outside
the scope of a typical email server. Today's
ja...@mansionfamily.plus.com writes:
I get a couple of issues - there are commands that relate to to
postgres' which isn't installed by the port (which installs pgsql) -
and is easily fixed by defining the role - but the other is baffling.
Can you submit patches, perhaps?
Not sure what to?
I have an Ubuntu system running what claims to be:
root@smallserver:/usr/local/archiveopteryx3/bin# ./aox show build
Archiveopteryx version 3.1.3, http://www.archiveopteryx.org/3.1.3
Built on May 1 2011 16:54:19
Build source: oryx.git/v3.1.3
on postgresql 9.0, from Ubuntu repository.
And, I
A tricky issue. How should it work when the mailbox is empty, but aox undelete
would repopulate the mailbox?
Arnt
I think 'Empty Deleted' should mean what it says.
If aox undelete can recover the data, I don't think it needs to go back
to where it was, some 'salvaged' area is fine.
I'm using Thunderbird.
If I delete a folder it gets moved to 'Deleted', but 'empty deleted'
does not remove it (or messages contained within it).
If I try to delete a folder in Deleted, and its not empty, I get a SQL
error reported from Postgres through to Thunderbird.
James
with a
lot of large attachments, and the pairing often falls flat on its face
when I try to read or move the messages.
If anyone can recommend a better IMAP client (primarily for Windows)
with some scripting to categorise and move messages, I'll be happy to
try it.
James
lmtp is
configured.
James
I seem to have warning-as-error set for jam, which I just
installed.
That's set in our Jamfiles somewhere.
That's concerning - why doesn't 3.1.3 build for me then? Do you want
the error list?
James
whether the behaviour is the same on my real email server, but
this is definitely odd.
I take it others have got it running on 9.0.x?
James
If anyone just replied - I lost it. Playing around with too many
postgres versions on this box. :-(
?
James
20 matches
Mail list logo
