AW: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-14 Thread Daniel Frey
PROTECTED] Gesendet: Samstag, 13. März 2004 17:38 An: Avalon framework users Betreff: Re: Lifecycle disapeared Daniel Frey wrote: >>>Daniel Frey wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Stephen McConnell wrote: >>>> >>>>Just a note concerning activation -

AW: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-14 Thread Daniel Frey
Niclas wrote: > On Saturday 13 March 2004 22:58, Daniel Frey wrote: > >> Btw, I've found now three terms which in my limited beginners >> understanding > > I would like to caution you, and other users tapping into this thread; > > Avalon has over the last year or so undergone some massive changes

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
o: Avalon framework users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03/13/2004 10:37AM Subject: Re: Lifecycle disapeared [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this sounds like a similar issue to what I am seeing in the tutorial examples (see the topic Tutorial questions

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Andy . Dingfelder
mework users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03/13/2004 10:37AM Subject: Re: Lifecycle disapeared [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > this sounds like a similar issue to what I am seeing in the tutorial > examples (see the topic Tutorial questions (c

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this sounds like a similar issue to what I am seeing in the tutorial examples (see the topic Tutorial questions (context e xample) for my post) will getting the latest code solve this ? in the code I pulled yesterday, none of the examples seem to work. they all produce

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Andy . Dingfelder
PROTECTED]> From: "Daniel Frey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03/13/2004 02:34AM Subject: Lifecycle disapeared Hello, When I started using maven and merlin four days ago, the tutorial excaples run right. Now, running the Hello tutorial does produce obscure output. A simple maven does bu

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 13 March 2004 22:58, Daniel Frey wrote: > Btw, I've found now three terms which in my limited beginners understanding I would like to caution you, and other users tapping into this thread; Avalon has over the last year or so undergone some massive changes, both community as well as

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Daniel Frey wrote: Daniel Frey wrote: Stephen McConnell wrote: Just a note concerning activation - the default behaviour is then any component declared using will have activation on startup enabeld by default - unless the component type is transient. Sounds like the default changes for all

Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Daniel Frey
>> Daniel Frey wrote: >> >>> Stephen McConnell wrote: >>> >>> Just a note concerning activation - the default behaviour is then any >>> component declared using will have activation on startup >>> enabeld by default - unless the component type is transient. >> >> Sounds like the default change

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Daniel Frey wrote: Stephen McConnell wrote: Does you component directive assert activation on startup - e.g.: It didn't. When adding this, it works! But strange that I had to add this now. Before, it worked without any explicit activation. Has the default behaviour changed? There was a bug t

Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Daniel Frey
>Stephen McConnell wrote: > > Does you component directive assert activation on startup - e.g.: > > It didn't. When adding this, it works! But strange that I had to add this now. Before, it worked without any explicit activation. Has the default behaviour changed? > Just a note concerning acti

Re: AW: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Daniel Frey wrote: Stephen McConnell wrote: Fixed. It works on my Hello sample too now. But my application doesn't. Still the same output like the one below. My application does implement Serviceable and Executable and extends AbstractLogEnabled. Does you component directive assert activation on

AW: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Daniel Frey
>Stephen McConnell wrote: > Fixed. It works on my Hello sample too now. But my application doesn't. Still the same output like the one below. My application does implement Serviceable and Executable and extends AbstractLogEnabled. As I have also problems with logging (other thread), I disabled the

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Stephen McConnell wrote: Daniel: This was raised a few days ago - and I thought I fixed it. I just ran a test locally and I'm getting the same result as you! I.e. something is broken. I'll dig and see what is going on. Fixed. My fault - while working on the composition api I incorrectly set

Re: Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Daniel: This was raised a few days ago - and I thought I fixed it. I just ran a test locally and I'm getting the same result as you! I.e. something is broken. I'll dig and see what is going on. Stephen. Cheers, Stephen. Daniel Frey wrote: Hello, When I started using maven and merlin four

Lifecycle disapeared

2004-03-13 Thread Daniel Frey
Hello, When I started using maven and merlin four days ago, the tutorial excaples run right. Now, running the Hello tutorial does produce obscure output. A simple maven does build it correctly (see part of the output): ... [junit] Running tutorial.StandardTestCase [INFO ] (kernel): installi