I will test both components and see if there are any issues, besides that the
activemq-camel 5.8.0 component had to be modified to überhaupt play nice
with Karaf :) . And i cannot oversee any issues concerning the ENTESB633
bug, so lets find out.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.46
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Maurice wrote:
> Nothing new there, but why use the jms component on this workaround which
> connects to amq? This does not give much confidence on an issue that is
> already not working as it should.
>
What do you mean?
activemq-camel is the preferred component
Nothing new there, but why use the jms component on this workaround which
connects to amq? This does not give much confidence on an issue that is
already not working as it should.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-or-activeMQ-component-for-xa-transacti
it is clearly
> stated that the activemq-camel component should be used for amq. Is this
> also the case for xa transactions?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-or-ativeMQ-component-for-xa-transactions-tp5734515.html
> Se
:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-JMS-or-ativeMQ-component-for-xa-transactions-tp5734515.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
