Hi Claus,
after having more thoughts about the claim check thing, I don't think
its the right thing for my need. I need to be able to lazy load some
stuff on demand. I don'T know when I need it because users can plugin
their own implementation to process the object. Sometimes they don't
need to ac
Hi Claus,
yeah claim check sounds like the one I was looking for.
Yes I was refering the the AMQ BlobMessage because from my
understanding it is the way you usual handle such stuff with AMQ.
Thx again,
Norman
2010/3/2 Claus Ibsen :
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi a
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we just switched to using Camel + Activemq for message routing and
> spooling in JAMES. At the moment we store the whole MimeMessage as a
> byte array in the payload of the Exchange. This is super inefficient
> because of the possi
Hi all,
we just switched to using Camel + Activemq for message routing and
spooling in JAMES. At the moment we store the whole MimeMessage as a
byte array in the payload of the Exchange. This is super inefficient
because of the possibility of very big emails. So I consider using
BlobMessages for s
