Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

2014-03-03 Thread France
I believe this is a bug too, because VMs not running on the storage, get destroyed too: Issue has been around for a long time, like with all others I reported. They do not get fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3367 We even lost assignee today. Regards, F. On 3/3/14

Suitable solution for HW

2014-03-03 Thread Pääkkönen Pekka
Hi, I am planning to install virtualization or cloud solution to a rack server with the following spec: Dell PowerEdge R820 + 4 processors (Intel Xeon E5-4620), 8 cores/processor + 512 GB RAM + 8 HDD, 1 TB/disk + 2*1Gb, 2*10Gb network cards A similar server would also be available. One use

Re: Suitable solution for HW

2014-03-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Pääkkönen Pekka pekka.paakko...@vtt.fi wrote: Or would a virtualization solution (for example Xen) be a better choice? I don't understand your question or you don't understand cloudstack, Pekka. Using cloudstack you would still need a virtualization server like

RE: Suitable solution for HW

2014-03-03 Thread Pääkkönen Pekka
Hi Daan, Maybe I should have been clearer. I was wondering about the implications for performance. Would performance in a database clustering use case be better with plain Xen (or other virtualization solution), when compared to CloudStack with Xen? Or is this an unnecessary concern? Also, is

RE: Suitable solution for HW

2014-03-03 Thread Nux!
On 03.03.2014 11:22, Pääkkönen Pekka wrote: Hi Daan, Maybe I should have been clearer. I was wondering about the implications for performance. Would performance in a database clustering use case be better with plain Xen (or other virtualization solution), when compared to CloudStack with Xen?

Re: Suitable solution for HW

2014-03-03 Thread Geoff Higginbottom
Hi Daan. As Nux has already highlighted, disk IO is the critical factor for high performance database applications. Using local storage within the Hypervisor will only provide very limited IOPS, even with 15k SAS disks. We have been doing a lot of work with SolidFire storage recently. In my

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

2014-03-03 Thread Amin Samir
Hello, This link addresses your issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3367 Amin Sent from my iPad On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote: The primary storage needs to be put in maintenance before doing any upgrade/reboot as mentioned in the

CS mgm. inside XenServer

2014-03-03 Thread Dubravko Sever
Hi, I have unsupported configuration,and tying to run cs mgm,. inside XenServer Hypervisor that I'm managing . So is there any workarounf that allows me to manually register existing VM-s indide CS database, to avoid shutt down by agent. This is testing enviromend, but In feture I would like

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

2014-03-03 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Pretty poor, I agree. IMHO the ACS agent should not be allowed to reboot the host server. This is not the type of things you would like to automate as you will eventually end up with broken volumes and data loss. And you are right of course, like what happened in my case. I currently have

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

2014-03-03 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Koushik, I understand that and I will put the storage into the maintenance mode next time. However, things happen and servers crash from time to time, which is not the reason to reboot all host servers, even those which do not have any running vms with volumes on the nfs storage. The bloody

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

2014-03-03 Thread Nux!
On 03.03.2014 12:24, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: I am using HA for about 30% of the guest vms, but my testing showed that HA is not working reliably with KVM. It works pretty well if you initiate a vm shutdown inside a guest without using the ACS GUI. However, when the host goes down for whatever

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

2014-03-03 Thread Nux!
On 03.03.2014 12:37, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: Koushik, I understand that and I will put the storage into the maintenance mode next time. However, things happen and servers crash from time to time, which is not the reason to reboot all host servers, even those which do not have any running vms

Re: A shared network: State = Setup :(

2014-03-03 Thread Erik Weber
That should be correct. From: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+objects+states Setup - Indicates the network configuration is setup with Vlan from the moment it was created. Happens when vlan is passed in to the createNetwork call, so its immutable for the network

Re: UI customizations

2014-03-03 Thread Nux!
On 03.03.2014 18:37, Michael Phillips wrote: 1. Can the UI of CS be totally customized? 2. If the answer to #1 is yes, does anyone know of any companies that offers this? Michael, Everything the UI does is call APIs; you can get any web developer (in any language) to build a custom interface

Re: no VM statistics

2014-03-03 Thread Hollman Enciso R.
Thanks a lot Madan and Geoff

Re: CS 4.2.1 VPN connection failed

2014-03-03 Thread Geoff Higginbottom
Motty, What is the CIDR of the remote network ? Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com |

Re: KVM

2014-03-03 Thread María Noelia Gil
I forgot to add the following line: 2014-03-03 20:24:07,964 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (main:null) LibVirt version 0.9.10 required for guest cpu mode, but version 0.9.8 detected, so it will be disabled El 03/03/2014, a las 01:09, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com escribió: It

Re: CS 4.2.1 VPN connection failed

2014-03-03 Thread motty cruz
Hi Geoff, the CIDR of the remote network is 192.168.0.0/24 IKE policy : 3des-md5 ESP policy 3des-md5 IKE lifetiem : 86400 ESP lifetime 3600 dead peer detection yes state Error Status: Resource[Site2SiteVpnConnection:31]is unreachable: Failed to apply site-to-site VPN That is the error i'm

Re: CS 4.2.1 VPN connection failed

2014-03-03 Thread motty cruz
Thanks for your reply Geoff, in CS Network - VPC - vpc1 - Router - Network ACL Lists I see two default_allow and default_deny, I am unable to change or remove this ACLs Thanks, Celso On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Do you am have a

Re: CS 4.2.1 VPN connection failed

2014-03-03 Thread Geoff Higginbottom
Celso, You should be able to create new ACL lists and also change which one is applied to the Tier. For the VPN return traffic you need to ensure that you have an ACL rule allowing the traffic. You could simply add an allow all rule for the CIDR of the remote network in the appropriate ACL

Re: CS 4.2.1 VPN connection failed

2014-03-03 Thread motty cruz
Thanks Geoff, the problem was in CS I had to create a VPC with /16 mask and once that was created I created network with mask /24 - to connect to client I was using /24 but once we used mask 16, connection was successful. thanks for your help! On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Geoff Higginbottom

RE: Suitable solution for HW

2014-03-03 Thread Pääkkönen Pekka
Hi, Yes. Thanks a lot for your answers. Regards, -Pekka -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 3. maaliskuuta 2014 16:15 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Suitable solution for HW Well Pekka, :) Do you find an answer to your question