VM 启用HA功能后能否迁移

Dear All, 现环境是cloudstack4.4.1+kvm+GlusterFS . 所有VM和HOST都启用了HA功能，现实例无法迁移主机。点击迁移到主机没有任何反应。但是系统VM是可以迁移的。而且我已经将系统VM的计算方案通过改数据库的方法添加了HA功能和主机标签。

Re: Fwd: Issue with Primary storage

My friend, your space on the physical host is used 100%. It might be because of some other data inside /home. do du -hs /home/*and same comand for any subfolder inside Home. To me, it seems that you VM's volume of 1TB which is still only 759GB on the disk, can not expand any more on

Re: Fwd: Issue with Primary storage

If you're using thin provisioning or overprovisioning you may very well allocate more than you're physically able to fit. What your VM sees is based on the virtual disk image size and does not refer to any underlying infrastructure. Your problem is that the underlying storage is full, so when

Re: Fwd: Issue with Primary storage

Exactly - and just for reference - overprovisioning does not wotk with LOCAL storage - only with shared storage... So give us the du -hs /home/*output as I asked, and same command for any subfolder inside /home/ On 11 November 2014 09:44, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: If you're

Re: Secondary storage problem

Hi, Could it be secstorage.allowed.internal.sites in Global Settings? I ran into this a while back. Cheers, - Original Message - From: MOULOUD BOUKROUT m.boukr...@afdb.org To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 8:50:10 AM Subject: Secondary storage

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v5.3.0 is released

11 November 2014 —Apache CloudStack, the mature, turnkey Open Source cloud computing software platform used for creating private, public, and hybrid cloud environments, today announced Apache CloudMonkey v5.3.0, the latest feature release of its command line interface tool. CloudMonkey is

RE: Secondary storage problem

Can you provide more logs , was Copycmd successful ? -Original Message- From: Garith Dugmore [mailto:gar...@saao.ac.za] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:10 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Secondary storage problem Hi, Could it be secstorage.allowed.internal.sites

[EVENTS] CloudStack conference

One week left before CloudStack conference, come join the fun. See you all in Budapest for a packed and exciting schedule. http://cloudstackcollab.org

Re: SSVM could not access Management Server.

Thanks Rajani, I checked that the agent is running on SSVM: root@s-1-VM:~# service cloud status CloudStack cloud service (type=secstorage) is running: process id: 3887 When I run *SSVM health check, it outputs:First DNS server is 192.168.0.100PING 192.168.0.100

Confusable default routing table on SSVM.

Hi, All, When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following route table on SSVM: root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2

Host with running VMs question.

Howdy everyone, Story: Host with all its VMs on local storage had its OS mirrored disk die and cause some problems with the running cloudstack-agent and corruption. I uninstalled/reinstalled the agent and that caused the cloudstack-manger to freak out and be in a state that I couldn't disconnect

[ACS430] Instances / network unable to access external network until an egress rule has been applied

I'm trying to find out if a bug we experience is known and fixed in a later version or not. We're running ACS/CCP 4.3.0 on XenServer 6.2, with advanced networking (VLAN isolated). The problem is that whenever a network is created or restarted it won't allow external access before an egress rule

Re: Confusable default routing table on SSVM.

Hi, All, Can experts examine the settings above if they are problematic? Could Management Server, KVM host and VMs all sit in the same 192.168.0.0/24 network? I checked a lot but have no idea, all firewalls have been turned off but still the SSVM could not contact Management server and the

Expand LV over 2TB CS 4.3.1 Xenserver 6.2

Hi there! I want to expand one of my LV-s to 22TB. I know about Xenserver limit, and it's does not work now but I had already succesfully expand LV-s over 10TB on native Xenserver 6.2 in command line, and it's works fine over a year. Actually I want to know, what will be happen, if I do it

Error Deploying template - Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on:

Templates are failing to deploy, Also the default template is failing and it used to work. The only thing that has change as I tried to update to 4.4.1 and it failed and I had to roll back the db and the management servers. I can deploy new VM's just fine so it has something to do with the

Re: Host with running VMs question.

Hi Clark, You cannot remove host while running VMs on your cloudstack. I am not sure what you had done to reinstall cloudstack-agent and cloudstack database. If you had local storage disk corruption then it will affect all your running VMs ROOT disks and DATA disks. If you will re add the

Re: Confusable default routing table on SSVM.

Hi Dan, It may caused your KVM host bridge settings. Please make sure its working fine using this command. [root@kvm ~]# brctl show Also check the KVM host /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties file network segregation settings. guest.network.device=cloudbr0

Re: Adding host to CloudStack problem (KVM)

Hello Gopalakrishnan, here is the output of the log: -- 2014-11-12 02:27:59,953 INFO [c.c.r.ResourceManagerImpl] (catalina-exec-19:ctx-2667c76b ctx-0e8268fd) Trying to add a new host at http://87.244.198.134 in data center 1 2014-11-12 02:28:00,121 DEBUG

Serious (ajax) GUI issues sometimes

Hi team, is anybody of you aware of the GUI issues when connected to some i.e. wireless with somewhat big latencies or it sometimes happen even on more than good internet connection: i.e: 1) (A serious one, that we encounter pretty often): Issue: I start new VM deloyment wizard, choose template

Re: Adding host to CloudStack problem (KVM)

Do an: lsmod | grep kvm on the hypervisor, according to the log the agent doesn't think the host is capable of running kvm -- Erik On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Michal Loncek lon...@energomail.sk wrote: Hello Gopalakrishnan, here is the output of the log:

Re: Adding host to CloudStack problem (KVM)

Hi Michal, please check if the kvm is installed and if kernel module is actually loaded...? On 12 November 2014 08:34, Michal Loncek lon...@energomail.sk wrote: Hello Gopalakrishnan, here is the output of the log: -- 2014-11-12 02:27:59,953 INFO

RE: Confusable default routing table on SSVM.

Hello, It might happen if you have basic zone setup. We have implemented such configuration with XenServer, but it is confusable indeed. It is better to have differen LAN-s (VLANs) and partition the network properly. External L2/L3 switch is also a requirement. Vadim.

Re: Adding host to CloudStack problem (KVM)

Hello Erik, kvm module is loaded: [root@host05 ~]# lsmod | grep kvm kvm 337772 0 Thanks, Michal On 11/12/2014 08:42 AM, Erik Weber wrote: Do an: lsmod | grep kvm on the hypervisor, according to the log the agent doesn't think the host is capable of running kvm

Re: Adding host to CloudStack problem (KVM)

Hello Andrija, as far as I can tell, KVM module is loaded and KVM is installed: [root@host05 ~]# lsmod | grep kvm kvm 337772 0 [root@host05 ~]# service libvirtd status libvirtd (pid 5170) is running... Thanks, Michal On 11/12/2014 08:43 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: Hi