Hi Rafael,
I hadn't tried allocating more VM's until the host gets full. If this
feature was available and it was possible to both dedicate a pod to an
account, and force an account to only use that pod, I would want requests
to fail once this pod is full.
When I said the following with regards t
Great! The re-attach of a root disk occurs the same way. Just pass device ID of
0.
- Si
From: David Amorín
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Detach Root Disck
Hi Simon
We tried to pass device ID of 0
Hi Simon
We tried to pass device ID of 0 and now we can dettach root disk directly.
That's awesome!!
I really appreciate your help
..
David Amorín
En 28 sept. 2016 15:08, en 15:08, Simon Weller escribió:
>Pass device id of 0.
>
>Kvm should support this in 4.9 and 4.
Try doing a restart with network cleanup and see if that fixes your problem.
The fixes are in the system iso and that will required a redeploy.
- Si
From: David Amorín
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:18 AM
To: Simon Weller; [email protected]
Subje
Yes, we did the upgrade from 4.5.2 to 4.9.0
-- Mensaje original --
De: "Simon Weller"
Para: "[email protected]" ;
"David Amorín"
Enviado: 05/10/2016 18:11:26
Asunto: Re: Re[2]: Network ACL rules in VPCs are applied in an inverted
order (CLOUDSTACK-9404)
Was this an up
Was this an upgrade from an older release?
From: David Amorín
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re[2]: Network ACL rules in VPCs are applied in an inverted order
(CLOUDSTACK-9404)
We are running 4.9.0 and we are
We are running 4.9.0 and we are still facing the issues of the ACL Rules
(CLOUDSTACK-9404)
-- Mensaje original --
De: "Simon Weller"
Para: "[email protected]" ;
"David Amorín"
Enviado: 04/10/2016 18:02:22
Asunto: Re: Network ACL rules in VPCs are applied in an inverted or
To do so you can use a specific service offerring.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 7:14 AM, cs user wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Thanks for responding. It is possible to force them to only be able to use
> that pod however?
>
> So that when the create a machine, these machines are force
That is a good question.
Sorry I have not seen your first email. I have just read it now. I noticed
you already tried dedicating a POD to an account.
I am curious by what you meant with:
"When the account selects this service offering, the instance is created on
an empty host. Addition instances c
Hi Rafael,
Thanks for responding. It is possible to force them to only be able to use
that pod however?
So that when the create a machine, these machines are forced to launch in
that pod.
Cheers
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
[email protected]> wrote:
> You can
[UPDATE] this is the API method that you could use:
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.9/apis/dedicatePod.html
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
[email protected]> wrote:
> You can dedicate a pod to a user account or domain.
> Have you tried that?
>
> On Wed
You can dedicate a pod to a user account or domain.
Have you tried that?
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:09 AM, cs user wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest version
> of Cloudstack, is it possible to force an account to launch in a particular
> pod?
Hi All,
I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest version
of Cloudstack, is it possible to force an account to launch in a particular
pod?
Cheers!
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, cs user wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Question regarding dedicating a Pod to an account..
>
Hi Ghait,
So your problem secondary share is hosted on a XenServer? Apart from this not
being supported I could see this causing you a few technical issues – I would
suggest you move your problem secondary share to your CentOS box.
Attachments are stripped from mailing list postings unfortunate
Best Regards,
Ghaith Bannoura
G http://www.etq.com
-Original Message-
From: Ghaith Bannoura [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Error in creating new instances
Hello Dag,
Sorry for that but I founded the tw
Hello Dag,
Sorry for that but I founded the two logs and I attached them .
Also I use the local storage as primary storage and three secondary shares (two
of them on centos NFS and one another in xenserver that have the error)
Can you please advise if you able to find anything useful in the log
Hi Ghait,
It seems very odd that you don’t have a /var/log/SMlog file – this should be
present. Lacking that also check your /var/log/xensource.log and messages files.
Can you also explain what provides your NFS secondary and primary shares?
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
On 04/10/2016, 20:09, "Ghaith
17 matches
Mail list logo
