Hi Andrija,
I've setup the CloudMonkey on my local host and done some experimentation. It
turns out that the API does support specifying multiple ips/networks per single
ACL. The gui reflects this and shows a comma separated list. So, it looks like
I can do everything I want from the
Actually, I was wrong and made a mistake. The ACS gui does allow specifying
multiple networks/IPS on the same ACL. I had a typo when I was testing it. All
jolly good!
Cheers
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrija Panic"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Friday, 3 May, 2019 17:04:24
> Subject: Re:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf209405e7d60b6a5abf87677d368c429359d98a
,
for KVM and ROOT volumes only (didn't test it myself).
On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 17:41, Razvan Rosca wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Yeah, NFS is specified so I doubdt local storage will work, unfortunately.
>
> Razvan Rosca
Hi Andrei,
I didn't claim that work actually - did you test it, does it actually
works (if I understand correctly - you want in single rule to specify
multiple CIDR ranges instead of creating a rule for each CIDR range in
question) ?
Best,
On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 17:36, Andrei Mikhailovsky
Hey,
Yeah, NFS is specified so I doubdt local storage will work, unfortunately.
Razvan Rosca
Skype: razvan.rosca
Tel: +40 731 059 660
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/razvanrosca/
Facebook: https://fb.com/razvanrosca.com
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 6:26 PM Nux! wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All I can
Hi Andrija,
I wasn't aware the API supports creating ACLs with multiple networks / IP
addresses.
Andrei
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrija Panic"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Friday, 3 May, 2019 16:11:37
> Subject: Re: Automating creation of ACLs
> Hi Andrei,
>
> perhaps I got
Hi,
All I can find right now is this, which doesn't specifically mention local
storage, so will need to be tested.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/14
By the sound of it it leverages underlying libvirt capabilities.
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg
Hi Andrei,
perhaps I got something wrong, but why don't you use API to create needed
ACL rules ?
Andrija
On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 17:04, Andrei Mikhailovsky
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have come across a need to create an ACLs that includes around 100
> different IP addresses and network
Hello everyone,
I have come across a need to create an ACLs that includes around 100 different
IP addresses and network ranges for several services. Now, looking at the ACS
gui, there is currently no way that I could find to create an ACL with multiple
IP addresses / network ranges. Not sure
When I tested ACS 4.12, I used with XenServer 6.5, and it worked without
problems.
I have no idea on what that deprecation note means. In theory, we should
not deprecate anything without creating a major release (semantic
versioning.). I would expect a widespread notification and discussion
Hi guys,
we're going to upgrade CS 4.9 to 4.12.
Actually CS are managing some XenServer 6.5 but in Compatibility Matrix for
CS 4.12 I see that XS 6.5 is deprecated.
What it means?
Anyone knows if XS6.5 still works or it's possible that I'll lost the
management of those nodes?
Thank you!
Hey,
> you can only connect a VM into one network, so if you want to have a 2nd
"private" network, that's not yet possible with Cloudstack
This will not be an issue, the vast majority of users don't need any, or if
they need, one will suffice.
> it was possible to have local live migrations with
Hi,
In Proxmox you could use the "IP Filter" option + "Firewall in" options to
restrict IP address stealing. /offtopic
If you go for a Cloudstack Advanced Zone with Security Groups, then your VMs
can get 1 or more public IP addresses and this is enforced automatically via
iptables and
Hi Asai,
Secondary storage garbage collector (runs every "storage.cleanup.interval"
secs) tries to cleanup all the destroyed volume snapshots. The log below
has no relation with VM snapshots. As per the log, the cleanup failed for a
volume snapshot as Cloudstack couldn't get the details in
14 matches
Mail list logo
