Hi Jayanth,
The major part is the ISO uploads and template registration.
When RFC 1918 IP range uses with the nfs server as well, cloudstack unable to
create the system vm’s.
I also use wireguard to make communication between MS and KVM but it is also
not working.
I simple words with RFC 1918
Morning All,
Just to update, we managed to resolve the issue, but it had to be done manually
from the db.
Manually alter DB to remove templates from old zone
Successfully removed old templates > Old Secondary Storage > Old Zone
Changed "state" to "inactive" and added date & time to "removed"
Hi,
Can you add a security group rule with protocol number 47 (GRE) ?
-Wei
On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 at 00:30, Fariborz Navidan
wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> We have a client who is running two VMs on our cloud. They are running GRE
> tunnel between their VMs and a server outside our network. After last
-- Forwarded message -
From: Fariborz Navidan
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 02:59
Subject: GRE tunnel between user VM and a outside server not working after
KVM host reboot
To:
Hi Friends,
We have a client who is running two VMs on our cloud. They are running GRE
tunnel between
Extending these timeouts in the “wait” configs seems to have helped. One of my
1TB volumes is finally migrating.
WHat’s I’ve noticed is if I allocate a new 1TB volume, I can migrate this
between NFS and Ceph and it takes only about a 1 minute. I assume this is
because it’s “thin provisioned”
devs and users,
back in august we had a small discussion about a new website design,
led by Ivet [1]. In the meanwhile Rohit had investigated using
docusaurus as a publishing mechanism for the site. After the last few
weeks I have been working on integrating the two. The result so far
can be
Hi,
Is there anyone using SSL offloading and able to use "Images" `a "upload ISO
from local" in CS 4.18.1.0 ?
I receive the following error message in CS:
Network Error
Unable to reach the management server or a browser extension may be blocking
the network request.
And MGMT server log:
Hi Daan,
multipath is not used in our environments at all.
The tests for PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8524 look ok
until now. Let's wait for the test results.
-Wei
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 15:16, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Wei, is this with a VM/Volume not using multipath itself? If
Update:
After I updated the mgmt._server_id for all the hosts, looks like the tasks
are running now. I still have some issues with some system vms, I will
recreate and see if everything is ok.
Regards,
Cristian
-Original Message-
From: cristian.c@istream.today
Sent: Wednesday,
Congratulations, Alex!
Best wishes,
Vladi
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 17 January 2024 12:44
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli
Congratulations Alex!
Regards.
From: João Jandre
Hi Wei,
Please see :
root@acs-apac:/etc/cloudstack/management# hostname -f
acs-apac
One thing I saw right now in table hosts, the mgmt._server_id is still
corresponding to previous server
Right now, all the nodes are with state Up but with a timeout in logs. I
changed the
The msid should be same after restart.
Can you check if "hostname -f" works?
在 2024年1月17日星期三， 写道：
> I already have a headache. Anyone here who can provide support for this
> (not for a fee)? I need to restore this CloudStack, but it is impossible on
> this version.
>
>
> Now any task I
I already have a headache. Anyone here who can provide support for this (not
for a fee)? I need to restore this CloudStack, but it is impossible on this
version.
Now any task I execute I see repetitive :
2024-01-17 14:41:20,892 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentAttache]
Wei, is this with a VM/Volume not using multipath itself? If it is it
is definitely a reason to create a new RC, if it isn't I think we can
manage a known issue for a new feature.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:50 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> Thanks Ahbishek, and everyone tested or is testing RC2.
>
> I
Hello Bharat,
Please let me know if your question is only on ISO uploads and template
registrations.
Template registration of an external QCOW2 or any compatible ones need only
SNAT to work towards the destination (where your QCOW2s are hosted). Please
note that secondary storage VM is
Thanks Ahbishek, and everyone tested or is testing RC2.
I ran some tests on a ubuntu22 environment , and got the following
exception when stopping VMs.
2024-01-17 12:56:26,053 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-17:null) (logid:) Seq 2-8295911988593164342:
Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
Hi Jithin,
I can use the RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT but it has to be configured in the
system itself.
Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini
[signature_2404564422]
From: Jithin Raju
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 5:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Bharat,
Can’t you use an RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT for cloudstack public traffic?
-Jithin
From: Bharat Bhushan Saini
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin,
That is the major requirement as I am lacking
Good Day
When making snapshots, the snapshot first stores the file in primary
storage and then transports it to secondary storage and afterwards
deletes it from primary leaving the copy on secondary storage. We
currently use local kvm server as the primary storage for our VM
instances. This
Hi Jithin,
That is the major requirement as I am lacking to have the IP range. So that’s
why I consider the create virtual network and that network NATing with the one
interface and one IP.
Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini
[signature_495948912]
From: Jithin Raju
Date: Wednesday, 17 January
Hi Bharat,
For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.
-Jithin
From: Bharat Bhushan Saini
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Jithin and Suresh,
I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx
required /16 natted network but I have only /24
Hi Bharat,
Check this, it might help.
https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx
Regards,
Suresh
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 4:00 PM Bharat Bhushan Saini
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server
> on a single system.
>
> System config –
>
> RAM –
Hi Bharat,
This one may be useful:
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/
-Jithin
From: Bharat Bhushan Saini
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,
I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm
Hi Wei,
I just did this, now I set this for both entries :
|id |msid |runid|name|uuid
|state|version |service_ip |service_port|last_update|removed
|alert_count|
Congratulations Alex!
Regards.
From: João Jandre Paraquetti
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 18:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli
Congrats, Alexandre!
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 1/10/24 19:27, Nux wrote:
>
Hi All,
I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen
Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate
with my network through NAT as I am having on single
Hi,
Can you mark the mgmt server as Down (or set "removed" to "now()") in the
"mshost" table , and retry?
-Wei
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 10:29, wrote:
> Looks like restoring on the exact same OS version is not fixing the
> issue... at starting the cloudstack I get this error :
>
> 2024-01-17
Looks like restoring on the exact same OS version is not fixing the issue... at
starting the cloudstack I get this error :
2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:) System
resource: file:/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
2024-01-17
Hi All,
We're setting up Private Gateway on VPC but not able to get the connection
to work. The connection is successful from switch to Private Gateway IP
using VLAN 995.
However when Private Gateway is created in VPC, the connection failed when
tested from Virtual Router.
Physical Network 3 is
+1 (binding)
both signatures checked, otherwise as I was heavily involved I am
trusting in all testing done along the way.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 1:04 PM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
> a vote:
>
> Git Branch
31 matches
Mail list logo
