GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Trying autoscaling
on CloudStack
@mawmaz
You can find cloud images of various OS distributions on the internet, for
example Ubuntu, Debian, Rocky, Alma, OracleLinux
All these images use cloud-init which can get userdata from
GitHub user mawmaz added a comment to the discussion: Trying autoscaling on
CloudStack
How will I know if the template instances are actually able to run the userdata
script? It's a big dilemma at the moment deciding where the problem comes from,
because on one hand we know that the req
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Trying autoscaling
on CloudStack
> Another problem occurred now, the autoscale group aren't scaling at all when
> I used ApacheBench from the guide, the VMs CPU barely does anything but the
> virtual router had a hard
GitHub user mawmaz added a comment to the discussion: Trying autoscaling on
CloudStack
Thanks for the help.
Another problem occurred now, the autoscale group aren't scaling at all when I
used ApacheBench from the guide, the VMs CPU barely does anything but the
virtual router had a hard
GitHub user mawmaz edited a comment on the discussion: Trying autoscaling on
CloudStack
Thanks for the help.
Another problem occurred now, the autoscale group aren't scaling at all when I
used ApacheBench from the guide, the VMs CPU barely does anything but the
virtual router had a
GitHub user mawmaz edited a comment on the discussion: Trying autoscaling on
CloudStack
Thanks for the help.
Another problem occurred now, the autoscale group aren't scaling at all when I
used ApacheBench from the guide, the VMs CPU barely does anything but the
virtual router had a
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Trying autoscaling
on CloudStack
> 1. when I disabled the autoscale group (for maintenance scenario), it didn't
> expunge the existing VMs.
the monitoring, scale up/down are disabled.
existing VMs will not be touched.
GitHub user mawmaz added a comment to the discussion: Trying autoscaling on
CloudStack
Yes, I was when I submitted this thread.
I'm afraid that was my fault of understanding, a few hours back I realized that
Guest network should've matched the guest CIDR or at least a different IP
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Trying autoscaling
on CloudStack
do the guest network and public IP both use 192.168.1.0/24 ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/1#discussioncomment-13625849
This is an automatically sent email
GitHub user mawmaz edited a discussion: Trying autoscaling on CloudStack
Hi, I wanted try Autoscaling feature based on this
[guide](https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-autoscaling/). I installed the
platform few times with the tutorial from @rohityadavcloud from their
[blog](https
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple ports
for autoscaling
Hey @DaanHoogland , this feature would be really useful for us.
We Autoscale a bunch of API Gateways, and have to maintain 1 ASG for Each Port.
If there is a way to support multiple ports in the
GitHub user palashbiswas-git added a comment to the discussion: To support
multiple ports for autoscaling
Hi @DaanHoogland ,
I'm currently working with a container-based application that supports
autoscaling. However, I'm facing a limitation due to having a single load
balancer
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple
ports for autoscaling
at first sight this looks like a valid feature request @palashbiswas-git , but
can you elaborate on the configurations/requests/settings that you expect and
how they would bahave, including
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple ports
for autoscaling
This is a great feature for us. Right now, in order to overcome this
limitation, we deploy an NGINX instance in our VM, configured with static
routes. These static routes would then route traffic to
GitHub user palashbiswas-git added a comment to the discussion: To support
multiple ports for autoscaling
Hi @kiranchavala,
You are correct that this can be achieved through Kubernetes. However, our
requirement is to use either containers or normal VMs, where we can't handle
multiple
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple
ports for autoscaling
@palashbiswas-git , I am sure you have a valid use case, and I think something
like this could be implemented in the future. I read this as a generic problem
statement and not a very
GitHub user kiranchavala added a comment to the discussion: To support multiple
ports for autoscaling
Hi @palashbiswas-git
Have you tried cloudstack autoscaler for kubernetes ?
https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/tree/master/cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/cloudstack
When a
Hi,
I wrote a blog last year. It has been published at
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-autoscaling/
-Wei
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 15:02, Palash Biswas wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Thanks for looking into improvements. I think if Terraform adds support for
> autoscaling, it could real
Hey,
Thanks for looking into improvements. I think if Terraform adds support for
autoscaling, it could really push more organizations toward Cloudstack.
About the Scale Up/Down policy, it would be great if we could make it a
two-way option. This would cover CPU/Memory, network In/Out, and the
Hi,
Currently the VM autoscaling group is associated with a load balancing
rule. In the coming releases we might make the LB rule as optional so
the feature will work with shared/L2 networks.
To support multiple LB rules, it will be more complex as It requires some
design changes and database
ah, this looks like you want to involve something like terraform in
combination with a set of well prepared templates and autoscaling. I
do not think this will be "ready to go"/"out of the box"
functionality. For the autoscale group and for the container
deployment
ely? What cloudstack
> >> environment and configuration are you using? what dimension do you
> >> expect to scale?
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:48 AM Palash Biswas
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >
gt;
>> Palash,
>> can you please explain your use-case more precisely? What cloudstack
>> environment and configuration are you using? what dimension do you
>> expect to scale?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:48 AM Palash Biswas
>> w
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:48 AM Palash Biswas
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello community,
> >
> > Is there a way to integrate multiple load balancers into the autoscaling
> > group without using Kubernetes or Docker Swarm? I have Docker containers
> on
> > variou
ultiple load balancers into the autoscaling
> group without using Kubernetes or Docker Swarm? I have Docker containers on
> various ports, and I aim to achieve autoscaling for the VM. Please provide
> guidance on implementing autoscaling with multiple running containers.
>
> Regards,
> Palash Biswas
--
Daan
Hello community,
Is there a way to integrate multiple load balancers into the autoscaling
group without using Kubernetes or Docker Swarm? I have Docker containers on
various ports, and I aim to achieve autoscaling for the VM. Please provide
guidance on implementing autoscaling with multiple
Hello,
Is there a way to implement autoscaling for K8S cluster deployed using
CAPC? I'm asking this because these cluster are not listed via ACS API, like
the clusters deployed via Kubernetes plugin, implemented in ACS.
Thank you,
Cristian
> >
> > > Thanks for replying, my threshold is 5% just to check and the ACS
> > metrics
> > > says 28% in usage
> > >
> > > looks like no error in logs, however I see this message
> > >
> > > **success: Creating file in VR, with ip:
acdd8-b1c1-4603-9fde-79eece662390","null -
> > > success: Invalid unit name "cloud-password-server@172.28.0.1
> ,172.28.0.83"
> > > escaped as "cloud-password-server@172.28.0.1\x2c172.28.0.83" (maybe
> you
> > > should use systemd-es
> escaped as "cloud-password-server@172.28.0.1\x2c172.28.0.83" (maybe you
> > should use systemd-escape?)**
> >
> > 2023-05-30 15:05:13,988 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector]
> > (StatsCollector-6:ctx-361217f1)
> > (logid:f59c817a) AutoScaling Monitor is runni
,"null -
> success: Invalid unit name "cloud-password-server@172.28.0.1,172.28.0.83"
> escaped as "cloud-password-server@172.28.0.1\x2c172.28.0.83" (maybe you
> should use systemd-escape?)**
>
> 2023-05-30 15:05:13,988 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector]
> (Stats
- success:
Invalid unit name "cloud-password-server@172.28.0.1,172.28.0.83" escaped as
"cloud-password-server@172.28.0.1\x2c172.28.0.83" (maybe you should use
systemd-escape?)**
2023-05-30 15:05:13,988 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-6:ctx-361217f1) (logid:f5
Hi Ricardo,
We (including dev and qa) have done intensive testing with different
hypervisors and scenarios. You may hit a bug, but more likely a
misconfiguration issue.
You can check by the following steps:
(1) check database table "autoscale_vmgroup_statistics" to see if the
metrics have been co
Hi,
On our env with ACS 4.18 KVM hypervisor, we have configured an autoscale vm
group with cpu average counter, however it does not trigger the scale up even
the threshold have been reached longer than the stipulated. What should we
check? are we missing something?
Min Instances 1 (always rema
Hi guys,
Is there an issue or PR I can watch regarding the Autoscaling on KVM?
Regards
Hi
I'd like to announce Scalr - the open source Cloud autoscaling engine.
Scalr follows a general approach to scale instances on several public
Clouds including any Apache CloudStack based Cloud.
Find more on https://ngine-io.github.io/scalr/
The project is currently actively in develo
for version 4.3 so I am suspecting that maybe the
version I am working with (4.9) is no longer avaible.
I never get to see the autoscaling menu in Load Balancing options:
[cid:cb873cc1-e129-47fb-bb52-c4aa1ed7aca1]
I appreciate all help you can give me.
Regards,
Fernando Alvarez
Jefe de
enable the "autoscaling" function on my
cloudstack platform without success.
The idea is to enable the function without netscaler for a kind of POC,
however and beyond to meet the prerequisites (enable the function from global
settings, create a template with xen-tools, etc), I can not vis
Hi there!
Some time ago I am trying to enable the "autoscaling" function on my cloudstack
platform without success.
The idea is to enable the function without netscaler for a kind of POC, however
and beyond to meet the prerequisites (enable the function from global settings,
create
Hi @all,
is the autoscaling feature without NetScaler still availible in 4.10 ?
if it is what steps need to be done for using it ?
Kind regards
Ben
er VPX (*Version 10.5-55.8*) on XenServer and
> using the 90 days free license.
>
>
> *We have tried the following steps for AutoScaling with NetScaler:*
>
> 1. We have installed cloudstack with with *Basic zone* and added
> netscaler by selecting the network offering
> as D
Hi All,
We are trying to use autoscaling feature in Cloudstack either with
NetScaler or without NetScaler.
We have tried with both Cloudstack versions 4.4 and 4.5.
*Our configuration:*
-- management server : centos 6.4
ip:192.168.1.10
netmask:255.255.255.0
gateway:192.168.1.1
Hi Mr. Rajesh Battala,
Thanks a lot for your nice reply.
We have installed NetScaler VPX (*Version 10.5-55.8*) on XenServer and
using the 90 days free license.
*We have tried the following steps for AutoScaling with NetScaler:*
1. We have installed cloudstack with with *Basic zone* and
Hi,
I can help you with issues on Autoscaling with NetScaler.
Let me know how you have tried AutoScaling with NetScaler.
Which version of NS, License,
AutoScale configuration.
Autoscale with NS and without NS works completely diferent.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From
Hi All,
We are trying to use autoscaling feature in Cloudstack either with
NetScaler or without NetScaler.
We have tried with both Cloudstack versions 4.4 and 4.5.
*Our configuration:*
-- management server : centos 6.4
ip:192.168.1.10
netmask:255.255.255.0
gateway:192.168.1.1
-2014, at 1:46 pm, Giles Sirett
mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
I have a question around autoscaling
OK, I know that with a NetScaler, I can effectively create and destroy
instances based on demand.
I also know that we’ve recently added dynamic resource scaling of CPU and RAM
Thanks Giles!
Kind Regards,
Timothy Lothering
From: Giles Sirett [mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 06 July 2014 10:16 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Autoscaling
I have a question around autoscaling
OK, I know that with a NetScaler, I can effectively create and destroy
I have a question around autoscaling
OK, I know that with a NetScaler, I can effectively create and destroy
instances based on demand.
I also know that we've recently added dynamic resource scaling of CPU and RAM
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+o
ne 4, 2014 3:01 PM
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Is the cloudstack autoscaling fature only activated with
>> netscaler hardware appliance?
>>
>> Hi.
>> Is the cloudstack autoscaling fature only activated with netscaler
>> hardware appliance?
>>
4, 2014 3:01 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Is the cloudstack autoscaling fature only activated with
> netscaler hardware appliance?
>
> Hi.
> Is the cloudstack autoscaling fature only activated with netscaler
> hardware appliance?
>
Autoscale is available with vpx also.
-Original Message-
From: hossein zabolzadeh [mailto:zabolza...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 3:01 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Is the cloudstack autoscaling fature only activated with netscaler
hardware appliance?
Hi.
Is
Hi.
Is the cloudstack autoscaling fature only activated with netscaler hardware
appliance?
52 matches
Mail list logo
