I would choose (thinking about redundancy):
2 Storage + Management (one NIC is standby)
2 Guest
2 Public
But the following would ensure all 6 NICs would work constantly:
1 Storage
1 Management
2 Guest
2 Public
(in general) I would choose some of the 2 options above.
Let's say that your
Since I've 6 NIC for each Server, which is the best config?
2 Management
2 Storage + Guest
2 Public
??
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
gabr...@autonomiccs.com.br> wrote:
> I would say that it depends on how critical is your environment, and if
> the storage and
I would say that it depends on how critical is your environment, and if
the storage and management are suffering from low throughput.
If the main focus is redundancy, keeping management + storage in a bond
of 2 NICs is worth (considering that you would not have other 2 NICs
free to use and
Ok, so do you think that the best config is to keep management network separate
from storage?
If in next cluster I’ll move storage network to another bond, do you think I’ll
able to use both NIC for throughput?
Da: Gabriel Beims Bräscher
