Since I've 6 NIC for each Server, which is the best config? 2 Management 2 Storage + Guest 2 Public
?? On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher < [email protected]> wrote: > I would say that it depends on how critical is your environment, and if > the storage and management are suffering from low throughput. > > If the main focus is redundancy, keeping management + storage in a bond of > 2 NICs is worth (considering that you would not have other 2 NICs free to > use and make 2NICs for Storage + 2NICs for management). > > However, both traffic will be limited by the same NIC. On the view of > throughput, keeping management network separate from storage gives the best > that you can take from a NIC to each network. > > Em 23/08/2016 12:53, [email protected] escreveu: > > Ok, so do you think that the best config is to keep management network > separate from storage? > > If in next cluster I’ll move storage network to another bond, do you think > I’ll able to use both NIC for throughput? > > Da: Gabriel Beims Bräscher > > > -- > > Regards, > > Gabriel Beims Bräscher > Florianópolis | Brazil > <http://autonomiccs.com.br/autonomiccs-website/> > >
