Hi,
Yes. Thanks a lot for your answers.
Regards,
-Pekka
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 3. maaliskuuta 2014 16:15
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suitable solution for HW
Well Pekka,
:) Do you find an answer to your question
Well Pekka,
:) Do you find an answer to your question in here?
My answer(s) would have been;
no
and yes it is unnecessary. Cloudstack will orchestrate, provision and
leave the stuff alone from there on in.
regards,
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Geoff Higginbottom
wrote:
> Hi Daan.
>
> As Nux
Hi Daan.
As Nux has already highlighted, disk IO is the critical factor for high
performance database applications.
Using local storage within the Hypervisor will only provide very limited IOPS,
even with 15k SAS disks.
We have been doing a lot of work with SolidFire storage recently. In my op
On 03.03.2014 11:22, Pääkkönen Pekka wrote:
Hi Daan,
Maybe I should have been clearer.
I was wondering about the implications for performance.
Would performance in a database clustering use case be better with
plain Xen (or other virtualization solution), when compared to
CloudStack with Xen?
Or
lto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 3. maaliskuuta 2014 12:28
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Suitable solution for HW
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Pääkkönen Pekka
> wrote:
> > Or would a virtualization solution (for example Xen) be a better choice
: Suitable solution for HW
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Pääkkönen Pekka wrote:
> Or would a virtualization solution (for example Xen) be a better choice?
I don't understand your question or you don't understand cloudstack, Pekka.
Using cloudstack you would still need a virtuali
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Pääkkönen Pekka wrote:
> Or would a virtualization solution (for example Xen) be a better choice?
I don't understand your question or you don't understand cloudstack,
Pekka. Using cloudstack you would still need a virtualization server
like Xen. If you are on;ly
