GitHub user daniftodi closed a discussion: [Architectural] SystemVMs using
public DNS server
This might be a configuration issue but I'm pretty new in this area so I will
ask it.
Worth mentioning that I use the Basic network configuration.
I observe that SystemVMs are created using the publi
GitHub user daniftodi added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
I didn't experiment anymore, I have created an advanced zone and I'm using my
private dns as a public and as a private DNS.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
@daniftodi , did you try installing an advanced zone, as @rajujith suggested?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10352#discussioncomment-13002393
This
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
@daniftodi Unless you have specific reasons it is better to use an Advanced
zone. In a Basic zone, the guest network is assigned to the SSVM expecting that
the internet is accessible thr
GitHub user daniftodi added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
Version: 4.2.0.0
What I observed so far:
- It is missing a default route, it doesn't have access to the internet by
default, is this ok?
In order to be able to download templates I adde
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
ok, that is strange, it may not have set the internal server. It should have
resolved that hostname otherwise.
Can you maybe experiment on the ssvm a bit to what and how?
- If you set
GitHub user daniftodi edited a comment on the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
Yes, initially I had 1.1.1.1 as the external DNS, and 10.1.0.1 as the internal
one.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10352#discussioncomment-12108328
GitHub user daniftodi added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
Yes, initially I had 1.1.1.1 as DNS, and 10.1.0.1 as the internal one.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10352#discussioncomment-12108328
This is an aut
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
so initially, did you have both the external (1.1.1.1) and the internal
(10.1.0.1) DNS configured?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10352#discussioncomme
GitHub user daniftodi edited a comment on the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
DNS 10.1.0.1 has a record for storage1.lan, the thing is that before I realized
the problem, for Public DNS I had configured 1.1.1.1 and system image used this
DNS when resolving storag
GitHub user daniftodi added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
The DNS 10.1.0.1 has a record for storage1.lan, the thing is that for Public
DNS I had configured 1.1.1.1 and system image used this DNS when resolving
storage1.lan.
Yes, ssvm is starte
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: [Architectural]
SystemVMs using public DNS server
@daniftodi is the problem that the DNS at 10.1.0.1 does not have information (A
or CNAME) on 'storage1.lan'?
I'd have to look at an env, I don't think the fact that it is a basic zone
12 matches
Mail list logo
