tion about moving to
. .
I would be ok to +1 that ^^^
-paul
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 4:02 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
As I understand Daan's vote proposa
cking this vote thead or do you want to reconsider your vote?
Regards.
From: Paul Angus
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 15:55
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
Hi Daan,
From
05 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
Vivek, we could, but the main idea is that we repair our versioning system and
make clear how we are actually dealing with our current system, which is major
- new , possibly breaking
Vivek, we could, but the main idea is that we repair our versioning
system and make clear how we are actually dealing with our current
system, which is
major - new , possibly breaking features
minor - improvements and enhancements
tiny - urgent (security) fixes
and in addition we would go to 20
Paul,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:21 PM Paul Angus wrote:
>
> Hi Daan,
>
> Can you clarify what we are actually voting on please.
>
> In thread that is linked I've seen:
>
> "[the vote] will be to adjust to the semantic versioning system."
> - you can't go to 20 AND keep semantic versioning. The
Why not 5.0 ? Then it will be like 5.1, 5.2 in the future. Just asking ..!
> On 19-Feb-2024, at 10:49 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
>
> Hi Daan,
>
> Can you clarify what we are actually voting on please.
>
> In thread that is linked I've seen:
>
> "[the vote] will be to adjust to the semantic
+1
On 2024-02-19 15:09, Andrija Panic wrote:
+1
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 13:50, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
counted please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
scheme. The
Hi Daan,
Can you clarify what we are actually voting on please.
In thread that is linked I've seen:
"[the vote] will be to adjust to the semantic versioning system."
- you can't go to 20 AND keep semantic versioning. The act of going to 20
breaks semantic versioning [1].
" drop the 4 at
+1
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 13:50, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> LS,
>
> This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
> counted please reply to dev@.
>
> As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
> scheme. The result would be that the next major
+1
Op 19/02/2024 om 13:49 schreef Daan Hoogland:
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
counted please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 1:50 PM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted
please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we
11 matches
Mail list logo
