Can't say I'd support a separate log for each ssvm but a different log for
each zone isn't a bad idea.
Could be worth a feature request!
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie
On 2
Yep, still no new console proxy vm. I'll have to take a look at the logs to
see what's going on.
side note: I wish each zone would log to a separate log, or system vm activity
would log to a separate log from the user instances.
On Jul 23, 2013, at 2:40 PM, David Comerford wrote:
> Yeah, sh
Yeah, should be a couple of minutes at most.
If you don't have it yet it's time to examine the logs.
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie
On 23 July 2013 19:35, Dean Kamali wro
I destroyed proxy vm few days ago, and in about 30 seconds or so I saw the
new one getting created and started in about 1 -2 min.
environment: cs 4.1 xenserver 6.0.2
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Caleb Call wrote:
> That's odd because of all my zones, this is the only one I haven't moved a
That's odd because of all my zones, this is the only one I haven't moved a
hypervisor in or out of since being built.
I destroyed the Console Proxy VM, how long should it take before CS spins a new
one up?
Thanks
On Jul 22, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> Hey Caleb, looks like th
Hey Caleb, looks like the host the console proxy used to live on is gone.
see:
The last host of this VM cannot be found
2013-07-18 14:02:40,142 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
(Job-Executor-43:job-5916) Cannot choose the last host to deploy this VM
what I would do is nuke (destroy) the consol
Primary storage is not in maintenance mode and is available. I have a couple
dozen VMs running from this same primary storage and the SSVM and router VM are
both running from this same storage. Only the console proxy seems to be having
a problem.
$ ./cloudAPI.pl -c listStoragePools -p
cluste
> For some reason I was thinking the system VMs lived on the secondary
storage, but I'm probably wrong on that.
The templates for the system VM's live on secondary storage, then they are
deployed to primary storage.
Allocator seems happy enough to use host id 51 but theres no primary
storage avail
pastebin please
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Caleb Call wrote:
> When trying to start the console proxy in one of my zones fails. I'm
> getting an error that says "no suitable storagePools for in this cluster".
> Which storage pool would this be? For some reason I was thinking the
> syst
