rk interface: cloudbr0
>>>> 2016-08-30 12:28:50,932 DEBUG [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase]
>>>> (main:null) (logid:) Retrieving network interface: cloudbr0
>>>> 2016-08-30 12:28:50,932 DEBUG [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase]
>>>> (main:null) (logi
ype: msmart13
>> Email: msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com
>>
>> On 08/29/2016 10:39 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I wasn't clear...I meant change your interfaces by removing the
>>> vlans so the bridges show just the interface name.
>>>
>>> Sim
: Matthew Smart <msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:42 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
Did this error end up in a bug report in Jira? I have just ran into the
exact same issue testing an advanced network where public, p
@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
Unfortunately that didn't fix it either, it looks like they just change
straight back to "cloudbr0":
[root@node1 ~]# tail -n 3 /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties
private.network.d
.com]
> Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 8:32PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
>
> Unfortunately that didn't fix it either, it looks like they just change
> straight back to "cloudbr0":
[users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
Unfortunately that didn't fix it either, it looks like they just change
straight back to "cloudbr0":
[root@node1 ~]# tail -n 3 /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties
private.network.device=eth0
public.network.d
e-
> From: John Cenile [jcenile1...@gmail.com]
> Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 10:08AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
>
> I just tried this, unfortunately that didn't solve it. I was under the
>
-
From: John Cenile [jcenile1...@gmail.com]
Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 10:08AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
I just tried this, unfortunately that didn't solve it. I was under the
impression that the master replaced
inal Message-
> From: John Cenile [jcenile1...@gmail.com]
> Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 7:28AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
>
> On 29 August 2016 at 22:16, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.co
[users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
On 29 August 2016 at 22:16, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:
> So, my guess here is that the agent doesn't like the fact you have a sub
> interface plugged into the bridge. This is an advanced network zon
On 29 August 2016 at 22:16, Simon Weller wrote:
> So, my guess here is that the agent doesn't like the fact you have a sub
> interface plugged into the bridge. This is an advanced network zone,
> correct?
I haven't actually got that far, but I'm aiming for the Basic network
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
On 29 August 2016 at 21:57, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:
> Can you post the output of brctl show?
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfac
On 29 August 2016 at 21:06, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
>
> Does the management server can ssh on the kvm server?
Yes it can.
[root@master ~]# ssh 10.1.1.2
root@10.1.1.2's password:
Last login: Mon Aug 29 21:44:20 2016 from master
[root@node1 ~]#
On 29 August 2016 at 21:06,
/agent/log4j-cloud.xml
- Si
Simon Weller/ENA
(615) 312-6068
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [pd...@cloudops.com]
Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 6:06AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic
I presume the kvm
I presume the kvm node is a different one than the management server, has a
basic tests:
Does the management server can ssh on the kvm server?
Does the kvm server can tcp connect on the mgt server port 8250?
On Aug 29, 2016 03:52, "John Cenile" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm
15 matches
Mail list logo