Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-09-08 Thread Yuriy Karpel
rk interface: cloudbr0 >>>> 2016-08-30 12:28:50,932 DEBUG [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase] >>>> (main:null) (logid:) Retrieving network interface: cloudbr0 >>>> 2016-08-30 12:28:50,932 DEBUG [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase] >>>> (main:null) (logi

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-09-08 Thread Yuriy Karpel
ype: msmart13 >> Email: msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com >> >> On 08/29/2016 10:39 PM, Simon Weller wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I wasn't clear...I meant change your interfaces by removing the >>> vlans so the bridges show just the interface name. >>> >>> Sim

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-09-07 Thread Simon Weller
: Matthew Smart <msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:42 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic Did this error end up in a bug report in Jira? I have just ran into the exact same issue testing an advanced network where public, p

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-09-06 Thread Matthew Smart
@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic Unfortunately that didn't fix it either, it looks like they just change straight back to "cloudbr0": [root@node1 ~]# tail -n 3 /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties private.network.d

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-30 Thread John Cenile
.com] > Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 8:32PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] > Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic > > Unfortunately that didn't fix it either, it looks like they just change > straight back to "cloudbr0":

RE: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread Simon Weller
[users@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic Unfortunately that didn't fix it either, it looks like they just change straight back to "cloudbr0": [root@node1 ~]# tail -n 3 /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties private.network.device=eth0 public.network.d

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread John Cenile
e- > From: John Cenile [jcenile1...@gmail.com] > Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 10:08AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] > Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic > > I just tried this, unfortunately that didn't solve it. I was under the >

RE: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread Simon Weller
- From: John Cenile [jcenile1...@gmail.com] Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 10:08AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic I just tried this, unfortunately that didn't solve it. I was under the impression that the master replaced

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread John Cenile
inal Message- > From: John Cenile [jcenile1...@gmail.com] > Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 7:28AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] > Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic > > On 29 August 2016 at 22:16, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.co

RE: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread Simon Weller
[users@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic On 29 August 2016 at 22:16, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > So, my guess here is that the agent doesn't like the fact you have a sub > interface plugged into the bridge. This is an advanced network zon

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread John Cenile
On 29 August 2016 at 22:16, Simon Weller wrote: > So, my guess here is that the agent doesn't like the fact you have a sub > interface plugged into the bridge. This is an advanced network zone, > correct? I haven't actually got that far, but I'm aiming for the Basic network

RE: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread Simon Weller
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic On 29 August 2016 at 21:57, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > Can you post the output of brctl show? bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfac

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread John Cenile
On 29 August 2016 at 21:06, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > Does the management server can ssh on the kvm server? Yes it can. [root@master ~]# ssh 10.1.1.2 root@10.1.1.2's password: Last login: Mon Aug 29 21:44:20 2016 from master [root@node1 ~]# On 29 August 2016 at 21:06,

RE: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread Simon Weller
/agent/log4j-cloud.xml - Si Simon Weller/ENA (615) 312-6068 -Original Message- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [pd...@cloudops.com] Received: Monday, 29 Aug 2016, 6:06AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: Incorrect details for private Nic I presume the kvm

Re: Incorrect details for private Nic

2016-08-29 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
I presume the kvm node is a different one than the management server, has a basic tests: Does the management server can ssh on the kvm server? Does the kvm server can tcp connect on the mgt server port 8250? On Aug 29, 2016 03:52, "John Cenile" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm