ppy to run any tests and
> would like to file accurate bug report.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 11 June 2018 10:58
> To: users
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
> Well, i
ng this up again but am happy to run any tests and
> would like to file accurate bug report.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 11 June 2018 10:58
> To: users
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs dire
ike to file accurate bug report.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 11 June 2018 10:58
> To: users
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
> Well, it seems that you have found a bug. Can
---+-+--
> ---+++--+---
> ---+++--+---
> ----+-------+---
> ----+-------
management subnet ?
>
>
> 2) If i add another cluster can I just create a different NFS share from
> the same server ?
>
>
> Finally many thanks to you and the others for the help provided.
>
> ____
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 11 J
r the help provided.
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 11 June 2018 10:58
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Well, it seems that you have found a bug. Can you fill out an issue report
on Github?
Thanks for the hard work on debu
+--
> ---+++--+---
> ---+++--+---
> ----+---+---
> ----+---------+--
+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql>
So some sort of bug maybe ?
From: Erik Weber
Sent: 08 June 2018 10:15
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
While some
any
> > commands you need me to do.
> >
> >
> > FYI when I setup single NIC I use the guided installtion option in the
> UI
> > rather than manual setup which I do for the multiple NIC scenario.
> >
> >
> > Happy to set it up if it helps.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __
: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Ah so, it is not an advanced setup; even when you use multiple NICs.
Can you confirm that the message ""Agent investigation was requested on
host, but host does not support investigation because it has no NFS
storage. Skipping investigation.
_
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 07 June 2018 10:23
> To: users
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
> Ok, so that explains the log message. This is looking like a bug to me. It
> seems that in Zone wide the host state (when disconnecte
scenario.
Happy to set it up if it helps.
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 07 June 2018 10:23
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Ok, so that explains the log message. This is looking like a bug to me. It
seems that in Zone
018 at 6:06 AM, Jon Marshall wrote:
> zone wide.
>
>
>
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 07 June 2018 10:04
> To: users
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
> What type of storage are you using? Zone wide? O
zone wide.
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 07 June 2018 10:04
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
What type of storage are you using? Zone wide? Or cluster "wide" storage?
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Jon Marsh
> mysql>
>
> Do you think this problem is related to my NIC/bridge configuration or the
> way I am configuring the zone ?
>
> Jon
> ____________
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 07 June 2018 06:45
> To: users
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs
ted to my NIC/bridge configuration or the way
I am configuring the zone ?
Jon
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 07 June 2018 06:45
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Can you also post the result of:
select * from cloud.storage_p
Sent: 06 June 2018 19:06
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Hi Jon,
Still confused where your primary storage pools are – are you sure your hosts
are in cluster 1?
Quick question just to make sure - assuming management/storage is on th
rag the storage icon across in basic setup if I wanted it on
> a different NIC/IP subnet ? (hope that makes sense !)
>
> On the plus side I have been at this for so long now and done so many
> rebuilds I could do it in my sleep now 😊
>
>
>
> From: Dag Sonstebo
ifferent NIC/IP subnet
? (hope that makes sense !)
On the plus side I have been at this for so long now and done so many
rebuilds I could do it in my sleep now 😊
From: Dag Sonstebo
Sent: 06 June 2018 12:28
To: users@cloudsta
now 😊
From: Dag Sonstebo
Sent: 06 June 2018 12:28
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Looks OK to me Jon.
The one thing that throws me is your storage pools – can you rerun your query:
select * from cloud.s
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Hi Rafael
Thanks for the help, really appreciate it.
So rerunning that command with all servers up -
mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1 and removed is
n
: Jon Marshall
Sent: 06 June 2018 11:08
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Hi Rafael
Thanks for the help, really appreciate it.
So rerunning that command with all servers up -
mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id
as with the management which I think
is what I should do ?
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 06 June 2018 10:54
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Jon, do not panic we are here to help you :)
So, I might have mistyped the SQL query.
traffic IP subnet range.
I know it is something stupid I am doing 😊
From: Dag Sonstebo
Sent: 06 June 2018 10:49
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Hi John,
I’m late to this thread and have possibly m
t;
> I am at a loss as to why though.
>
>
> I have a separate NIC for storage as described. When I add the zone
> and get to the storage web page I exclude the IPs already used for the
> compute node NICs and the NFS server itself. I do this because initially I
> didn't and the SSVM sta
ne 2018 16:13
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
That is interesting. Let's see the source of all truth...
This is the code that is generating that odd message.
> List clusterPools =
> _storagePoolDao.listPoolsByClust
s would be much appreciated.
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 05 June 2018 16:13
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
That is interesting. Let's see the source of all truth...
This is the code that is generating that odd m
> >
> > From: Rafael Weingärtner
> > Sent: 05 June 2018 16:13
> > To: users
> > Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
> >
> > That is interesting. Let's see the source of all truth...
> >
NFS storage as far as I can tell !
>
>
>
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 05 June 2018 16:13
> To: users
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
> That is interesting. Let's see the source of all truth..
o NFS storage as each compute
> node has a dedicated storage NIC.
>
>
> I also don't understand why it thinks the host is still up ie. what test
> is it doing to determine that ?
>
>
> Am I just trying to get something working that is not supported ?
>
>
>
o NFS storage as each compute
> node has a dedicated storage NIC.
>
>
> I also don't understand why it thinks the host is still up ie. what test
> is it doing to determine that ?
>
>
> Am I just trying to get something working that is not supported ?
>
>
>
: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 04 June 2018 15:31
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
What type of failover are you talking about?
What ACS version are you using?
What hypervisor are you using?
How are you configuring your NICs in the hypervisor?
How are you configu
I think I do know what it means.
Let me build it with 3 separate NICs again an rerun.
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 04 June 2018 15:31
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
What type of failover are you talking about?
What
eingärtner
Sent: 04 June 2018 21:15
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Everything seems to be normal at a first glance. Do you see some sort of
error in the log files?
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Jon Marshall wrote:
> CS version 4.11
>
> VM HA
g and if so how does
it then in effect bypass the virtual router (in terms of NAT) or do I not need
to worry about this ?
Thanks
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 04 June 2018 21:15
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Everythi
72.30.5.3 /28 <-- storage traffic
>
>
> traffic labels would be cloudbr0, cloudbr1, cloudbr2
>
>
> Can only get failover working when I put all traffic on same NIC.
>
>
>
>
> From: Rafael Weingärtner
> Sent: 04 June 2018 15:31
cloudbr1, cloudbr2
Can only get failover working when I put all traffic on same NIC.
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 04 June 2018 15:31
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
What type of failover are you talking about?
What versio
What type of failover are you talking about?
What ACS version are you using?
What hypervisor are you using?
How are you configuring your NICs in the hypervisor?
How are you configuring the traffic labels in ACS?
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Jon Marshall wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> I am close to gi
Sorry that should say "not bother with the public traffic"
From: Jon Marshall
Sent: 04 June 2018 15:29
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Hi all
I am close to giving up on basic networking
Hi all
I am close to giving up on basic networking as I just cannot get failover
working with multiple NICs (I am not even sure it is supported).
What I would like is to use 3 NICs for management, storage and guest traffic. I
would like to assign public IPs direct to the VMs which is why I or
40 matches
Mail list logo
