Hi Len,
Some Background:
There are two Storage 'measures', the actual storage 'used', and the storage
'allocated'.
As an example let's assume you are using NFS, have 100GB of Primary Storage,
and have set storage.overprovisioning.factor to 4
Because of the Over Provisioning Factor, your syste
Yes, basic network does support network rate limit in compute offering.
-Original Message-
From: WXR [mailto:1485739...@qq.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:03 AM
To: users
Subject: Does compute offering in basic network support network rate limit？
I create a compute offering with 1M
Can't say I'd support a separate log for each ssvm but a different log for
each zone isn't a bad idea.
Could be worth a feature request!
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie
On 2
Hi list,
Does anyone know of a way to configure the DHCP pool for guest networks?
I'm using a /24 for the Guest CIDR but I'd like the virtual router to only
give out addresses for a certain range in that subnet say .10 to .200. Is
this possible?
Thanks!
Best regards,
David Comerford
On 22/07/13 5:29 PM, "Valery Ciareszka" wrote:
>>Not sure what you meant by 'combined' isolated and guest networks, but
>>you
>can have both 'isolated' and 'shared' networks co-existing in a zone.
>
>I created shared network -
>http://thesuki.org/temp/ss/SS-20130722145047.png
>Cloudstack treats i
> -Original Message-
> From: David Comerford [mailto:davest...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 24 July 2013 16:23
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: DHCP options for guest networks
>
> Hi list,
>
> Does anyone know of a way to configure the DHCP pool for guest networks?
> I'm using a /24 for
Thanks for that. Great feature!
I'm guessing it's not possible on versions prior to 4.2 by any other means?
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie
On 24 July 2013 12:19, Ram Ganesh
But a vm which uses 1Mb/s network rate compute offering on my cloudstack can
reach 100Mb/s inbound/outbound.
The link rate of my network is 100Mb/s,I think the limit does not take effect.
-- Original --
From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu";
Date: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 05:07
Cloudstack is an Iaas platform,I think it should offer elastic compute
resources.
Creating a limited number of compute offerings previously and apply them to new
vms is not a good idea.
Feel free to make a feature request and/or bug report with any suggests or
ideas you have.
It's a team effort friend - http://cloudstack.apache.org/contribute.html
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key
This is already an option. Lets say you have two compute offerings: Small
(1 vcpu and 1gb ram) and Medium (2 vcpu and 2gb ram). You can simply change
an instance from one to the other by powering off the instance and clicking
on the 'change service offering' icon.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:08 AM,
Do you mean that I can post my request on JIRA?
-- Original --
From: "David Comerford";
Date: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 08:16 PM
To: "users";
Subject: Re: Why does cloudstack create a vm instance through compute offering?
Feel free to make a feature request and/
Hi Geoff,
That's a really great explanation. Thanks.
One option then is to still use thin provisioning on the storage array, but
not put in any kind of overprovisioning factor in Cloudstack. We could then
give ourselves a fairly large volume on the array, and defer the monitoring of
"real" u
You can create an issue of type Bug, Improvement or Wish if your serious
about contributing some ideas or problems.
Best regards,
David Comerford
Tel: +353 87 1238295
Email: davest...@gmail.com
Website: http://dave.ie
GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie
On 24 July 2013 13:29, WX
Hi Len,
The only problem with your approach is that if your users created a bunch of
1TB Data Volumes (the default maximum) but put next to no data on them, with
overprovisioning set to 1, the system will assume they all have 1TB of data
allocated and it could mark the storage as full and preve
Hello everyone
I have been trying to setup this public offering based on Geoff
instructions.
[image: Inline image 1]
According to instructions when this offering is being used, it will spin a
router which will not act as a router however it will only process DHCP/DNS
requests.
However when I en
Hi Dean,
You will only see Network Offerings which have the Source Nat service enabled
listed at that top level.
You need to login as a Root Admin, then create the network from the
Infrastructure > Zones > Your Zone Name > Physical Network > Your Network Name
> Guest - Configure > Network Tab
Thank you, I have created the network, and then created an instance, the vm
boots up, I check NICs tab, and I see an assignment of Public IP however
the vm stuck at requesting IP for eth0 then the vm starts without IP.
I don't see a new virtual router getting created for this network.
Any ideas?
hello,
we had a cloudstack with 4.1 management server and 6.1 xenserver hosts. For
those xenserver host, I just upgraded them from 6.0.2 to 6.1.
But when I try to upgrade windows vm xe-tools from 6.0.2 to 6.1, after reboot ,
all the network config was changed from static to dhcp, anyone see the s
Hi Dean
I've just repeated the process, created an new Network Offering with only DHCP,
DNS and User Data, then created a new network from it. I have just spun up a
new VM, the VR came online with a randomly assigned IP from the Guest Network
range and NO Public IP (as expected) Guest Instance
Dear all,
I tried to shutdown one of my hypervisor hosts to simulate a server
failure, and the HA is not working, all the VMs on the affected host is not
started on another available host.
I am using CloudStack 4.1.0 with KVM hypervisors and Ceph RBD for primary
storage.
My issue is similar to w
Did you enable HA for your compute offering?
On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I tried to shutdown one of my hypervisor hosts to simulate a server
> failure, and the HA is not working, all the VMs on the affected host is not
> started on another available host.
>
Is it running on KVM, we are seeing some real issue with HA simply not working
on KVM.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sen
Good morning,
We are a small company, based in Portugal.
We like to have your help to design and implement the CloudStack here in our
company, for internal testing and to provide some services to our customers
with the quai and have some contracts already in requested this service.
Melhores Cum
Hi Chip,
Yes, "Offer HA" is set to "Yes" on all my compute offerings.
Hi Geoff,
Yes, I am using KVM. Is this a known issue and is there any solution to
this problem?
Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
Cheers.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@s
Dear Chip, Geoff and all,
I scrutinized the management server's logs during the time when I shutdown
the host and the time when I turned the host back on.
This is the management server's logs when the host is being shut down:
http://pastebin.com/4wfV830Z
During the time, I noted that there are
I have created a new networking offering and enabled (DHCP,VPN,user Data),
but I'm unable to create a new work from it, because I can't see it in the
drop down list.
[image: Inline image 2]
However it doesn't show up on here
[image: Inline image 1]
Any idea?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:16 AM,
When I've seen this (and I've seen it a lot) I usually see that it thinks it's
missed a ping and so it puts the host in an avoid set. I think the "health
check" feature in CS needs a lot of work to be much more reliable. Sometimes
if I let the host sit long enough, it will magically (there's n
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:34:58AM -0600, Caleb Call wrote:
> When I've seen this (and I've seen it a lot) I usually see that it
> thinks it's missed a ping and so it puts the host in an avoid set.
> I think the "health check" feature in CS needs a lot of work to be
> much more reliable. Sometimes
Hi,
There is a global setting parameter called " vm.network.throttling.rate" , if
this is set , the value in compute offering will be overwrite with this.
For the rate limit value in compute offering to take effect, set the global
paramet to 0 and restart management server.
Btw network rate limi
Hi Carlos,
Welcome! We're always willing to help but do you have any specific questions?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Carlos - c2bsi [mailto:carl...@c2bsi.pt]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:41 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Cloudstack hardware and software re
Greetings !
I have almost 300 VM's (GNU/Linux + Windows) running on Hyper-V. I want to
migrate all of them to a fresh private cloud built using Apache CloudStack
4.1 and Citrix XenServer 6.1.
I've planned to use the following approach,
1. Shutdown the VM on Hyper-V and copy its VHD.
2. Import th
How many clients / budget ? Tell us more about your ISP / collocation .
Number of server / storage ..etc
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Welcome! We're always willing to help but do you have any specific
> questions?
>
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message--
Is xenserver 6.1 supported on CS 4.1?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:02 PM, iliyas shirol wrote:
> Greetings !
>
> I have almost 300 VM's (GNU/Linux + Windows) running on Hyper-V. I want to
> migrate all of them to a fresh private cloud built using Apache CloudStack
> 4.1 and Citrix XenServer 6.1.
>
Can someone "explain like I'm 5" how HA in CS should work? I have 4.1 setup
with XCP hosts. To simulate a host failure, I've hard powered off a host
through iDRAC and CS doesn't seem to know about it, at all -- the instances
still show as running, but I cannot connect to them, and the host shows as
Yes, it does.
PFB the compatibility matrix for ACS-4.1,
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-41-compatibility-matrix.html
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dean Kamali wrote:
> Is xenserver 6.1 supported on CS 4.1?
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:02 PM, iliyas shirol >wrote:
>
>
2013-07-24 10:08:50,973 DEBUG [cloud.ha.AbstractInvestigatorImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-16:null) host () cannot be pinged, returning null
('I don't know')
2013-07-24 10:08:50,973 DEBUG [cloud.ha.UserVmDomRInvestigator]
(AgentTaskPool-16:null) could not reach agent, could not reach agent's
host, returning
So ... storage migration is supported?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:07 PM, iliyas shirol wrote:
> Yes, it does.
>
> PFB the compatibility matrix for ACS-4.1,
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-41-compatibility-matrix.html
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dean Kamali
> wr
I'll add onto Prasanna's email by saying avoid set is cleared on each
deploy vm. So if youre seeing that a lot, there's issues elsewhere. Reading
the log line by line when deploying is pretty helpful, you can see what
hosts are available for initial deploy, as well as storage pools. Usually
there i
what type of workloads to you foresee in your cloud?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Dean Kamali wrote:
> How many clients / budget ? Tell us more about your ISP / collocation .
>
> Number of server / storage ..etc
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
I recall it being talked about in the past, but can't seem to find it. Is
there a way to disallow users from being able to add their own
templates/ISOs?
--
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.met/kirkjantzer
FWIW, I'm not sure about in the UI, but you can change the API's ACL for
those commands within the commands.properties file to be root admin only.
This will probably leave the UI with the buttons, but will always fail for
the users.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> I recal
So, even if I were able to disable it for users in the UI, i'd still have
to change the API ACL to completely disallow it?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> FWIW, I'm not sure about in the UI, but you can change the API's ACL for
> those commands within the commands.propert
Unless there is a setting somewhere that might do this for you completely,
yeah.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
> So, even if I were able to disable it for users in the UI, i'd still have
> to change the API ACL to completely disallow it?
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:58
Hi Kirk,
I've seen this behaviour with KVM (I filed bug CloudStack-3535) but we've found
XenServer works fine.
There is a global setting (alert.wait) which is blank by default. This is the
number of seconds CloudStack waits after it loses communication a host before
doing anything. Blank some
There are just couple of template related global configs:
allow.public.user.templates - If false, users will not be able to create public
templates.
max.template.iso.size - The maximum size for a downloaded template or ISO (in
GB).
You can set max.template.iso.size to 0, and user won't be able
This same thing happened to me - but it was a Power-Supply that died
on a box. All my templates have HA turned on.
All the VM's (including 1 system-router-vm) were shown as "Running"
and the host itself was simply marked "Disconnected". When I tried to
shutdown the VM's to start them again I got e
I set the vm.network.throttling.rate value to 0,restart the management
service,and create a new vm with 1Mb/s compute offering.But the inbound and
outbound network rate is still 100Bb/s.
-- Original --
From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu";
Date: Thu, Jul 25, 2013 01:00
This sucks.
Can one of the folks on this thread please open a bug with as much
information as possible? I'd like to make sure that someone picks up the
issue and gets it resolved for the next release.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> This same thing happened to me - b
CLOUDSTACK-3535 bug looks like it is describing the problem perfectly.
What else can we add?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> This sucks.
>
> Can one of the folks on this thread please open a bug with as much
> information as possible? I'd like to make sure that someone pi
Nothing, looks good.
(And thanks for opening it Paul)
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> CLOUDSTACK-3535 bug looks like it is describing the problem perfectly.
> What else can we add?
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > This sucks.
> >
> > Ca
There is another bug for the same. CLOUDSTACK-3421
This document nicely explains how HA works in Cloudstack
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/High+Availability+Developer's+Guide.
As can be seen from the logs in this case, Cloudstack is not able to
conclusively determine if t
Please file a bug in JIRA is it is not working as expected.
-Original Message-
From: WXR [mailto:1485739...@qq.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:03 AM
To: users
Subject: Re:RE: Re:RE: Does compute offering in basic network support network
rate limit？
I set the vm.network.throttling.r
I can't confirm if it is a bug or my configuration fault.
Does any one succeed in limiting the network rate by compute offering?
-- Original --
From: "Sanjeev Neelarapu";
Date: Thu, Jul 25, 2013 01:34 PM
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org";
Subject: RE: Re:RE: R
Starting off, there is never going to be a way to "conclusively"
decide if a host is down. This is just the nature of complex systems.
We can only hope our software does "well" - and if "well" is "wrong" -
we have a way to clean up the mess created.
That said, I like the old behavior 3.0.x has. As
Although not recommended, but you could do this :
In the cloud db, replace the 'cidr' value in the networks table with the new
cidr value, corresponding to the guest-network .
So the dhcp range for that network will be the new cidr value you specify.
Thanks,
Saksham
-Original Message-
Fr
56 matches
Mail list logo
