Ive been reading that it is not possible to use Cloudstack with glusterfs +
VMware hosts?
Can anyone confirm this?
From: Jake G.
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 7:26 PM
Subject: Cloustack 4.1.0 + GlusterFS
Hi all,
I h
I think that CS will not even know that it is a Distributed FS since you
can mount the distributed volume in a folder and export it with NFS.
The question should be, is a distributed FS interesting to be used in a
cloud environment? Since there is a cost to use this kind of model and it
may or may
Hi,
Some time ago I tried to use GlusterFS as storage for cloudstacka but I
noticed that cloudstack uses the default settings for mount command.
By default mount command is using the UDP protocol but glusterfs works only
using tcp.
I think, if cloudstack developers could add "-o proto=tcp" to cod
Dear all!
In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual router, can't
understand why?
This is log of management-server http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu (rpm)
Thanks!
I would be happy to work with you on the issues that I raised and on the
installation process in general.
I can set up a collaboration meeting if that suits you.
Ron
On 10/09/2013 7:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Ron
I am not too happy with the documentation side too and will put in time i
On 11-Sep-2013, at 5:14 PM, Tomasz Zięba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago I tried to use GlusterFS as storage for cloudstacka but I
> noticed that cloudstack uses the default settings for mount command.
>
> By default mount command is using the UDP protocol but glusterfs works only
> using tcp.
> I
I totally agree with Tomasz, I do not think that using a distributed FS as
primary storage is a good idea, but as a secondary it sounds interesting.
But, off course you can try *;*)
2013/9/11 Shanker Balan
> On 11-Sep-2013, at 5:14 PM, Tomasz Zięba wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some time ago I tri
could you check the hypervisor logs ?
2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
> Dear all!
>
> In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual router, can't
> understand why?
>
> This is log of management-server http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
>
> Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
>
> CS 4.1.1
In vmware logs - nothing.
2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner
> could you check the hypervisor logs ?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
>
> > Dear all!
> >
> > In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual router, can't
> > understand why?
> >
> > This is log of management-server http://pasteb
the system VMs started normally?
2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
> In vmware logs - nothing.
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner
>
> > could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
> >
> > > Dear all!
> > >
> > > In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual rou
Hi,
Those thinking that it's not a good idea, do you mind
explaining your point of view?
GlusterFS seems like the only real
alternative to a highly priced SAN for the primary storage...
Thanks,
Olivier
On 2013-09-11 15:08, Rafael Weingartner wrote:
> I
totally agree with Tomasz, I do not
System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner
> the system VMs started normally?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
>
> > In vmware logs - nothing.
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner
> >
> > > could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Alex
have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
> System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner
>
> > the system VMs started normally?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
> >
> > > In vmware logs - nothing.
> > >
>
In kvm cluster i already have router.
First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have status
"Ready".
2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner
> have you tried to remove the VMwar
have you tried to create a instance with this template?
2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
> In kvm cluster i already have router.
> First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
> cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded a
Right now I can think in three main reasons:
The first reason, performance (I do not know Gluster and its performance
and if the read and write speed are satisfactory). Please if you can make a
test, post the results.
Second consistency, I do not know Gluster, but swift that is also a
Distributed
I'd be glad to jump in and help with this as well. I've taken notes on things
that differ from the docs when we were setting up a few test environments and
would love to help out to get the doc in shape in any way I can.
Travis
On Sep 11, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> I would be happ
It's good question! No, but I will try...
On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner"
wrote:
> have you tried to create a instance with this template?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
>
> > In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmw
I currently have GlusterFS deployed into an 8 node KVM cluster running on
CloudStack 4.1 for primary storage. Gluster is deployed on 28 1TB drives across
2 separate storage appliances using a distributed-replicated volume with the
replica set to 2. The storage network is 10Gb copper.
These are
Tomorrow is a bit crowded for me
Free after 10 PST for 1 hour
Free from 12 PST for 1/2 hour
On Friday, I am out for the day.
Ron
On 11/09/2013 1:04 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Thanks Ron
I am planning to work on Release Notes in the morning, do you have time later
in the day or tomorrow mo
could you post a little more of the log?
2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
> Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand why?
> This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> Thanks!
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
>
> > It's good question! No, but I will tr
Thanks Ron
I am planning to work on Release Notes in the morning, do you have time later
in the day or tomorrow morning PST for Installation issues.
Thanks
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:32
>
> I've given my last best shot at building CS 4.1.1.
> At the end of the build I get an error and no joy.
> Now, it's time to ask for some help.
>
Hi Clay:
Is there a reason you are building on your own, or could you use the
prebuilt packages?
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.1/
--David
Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand why?
This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
Thanks!
2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin
> It's good question! No, but I will try...
> On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner"
> wrote:
>
>> have you tried
Hi Nick,
Glad to hear you got it all sorted
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Nick Burke [mailto:n...@nickburke.com]
Sent: 06 September 2013 07:49
To: users@cloudstack.apach
Travis,
You might want to add the issues/ideas to the JIRA so they don't get lost.
If anyone wants to comment on what I wrote in any of my JIRA issues,
that could also be helpful since I am coming at this from a state of
ignorance that is sometimes helpful but also a bit limiting in what I
can
I have never used iozone before,
How did you get that report?
I tried: iozone -s 1024m -t 1 -R
But the report was pretty different from yours.
2013/9/11 John Skinner
> I currently have GlusterFS deployed into an 8 node KVM cluster running on
> CloudStack 4.1 for primary storage. Gluster is d
I ran each test independently for each block size.
iozone -I -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -r 4k -s 1G
In order: -I to specify direct-IO, -i 0 to specify write/rewrite, -i 1 to
specify read/re-read, -i 2 to specify random read/write, -r specify block size,
-s to specify file size.
The report is pretty tho
cool, thanks.
2013/9/11 John Skinner
> I ran each test independently for each block size.
>
> iozone -I -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -r 4k -s 1G
>
> In order: -I to specify direct-IO, -i 0 to specify write/rewrite, -i 1 to
> specify read/re-read, -i 2 to specify random read/write, -r specify block
> size, -
I have set up a GTM with Ron tomorrow 10 AM PST. Anyone else interested is
welcome to join, GTM details are provided below
1. Please join my meeting.
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/725491376
2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or,
call in using your t
alright, I will tune in, and see if I can help with anything :)
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> I have set up a GTM with Ron tomorrow 10 AM PST. Anyone else interested is
> welcome to join, GTM details are provided below
>
>
>
> 1.
It's always interesting seeing people advising against a solution
without actually having it tested :)
Thanks John for sharing your
results.
I guess that you're using XFS as the underlying FS ? Your
write-behind options, clearly show a performance improvement for write
speed.
Have you tried wit
So If I have created a zone with the
"DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService" network offerring. Created a VM
using the default security group, which has 0 ingress rules, I should NOT be
able to do things like PING that VM correct?
Correct. By default all the ingress traffic is blocked and the egress traffic
is allowed.
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:46 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Security Groups
So If I hav
You are right.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 12-Sep-2013, at 11:45 AM, Michael Phillips wrote:
> So If I have created a zone with the
> "DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService" network offerring. Created a VM
> using the default security group, which has 0 ingress rules, I should NOT be
> able to do
35 matches
Mail list logo
