RE: EOL for supported OSes & Hypervisors

From end user’s perspective, listing just OS, hypervisor version’s EOL status is only half the story. We need also to consider Apache CloudStack’s own EOL status to help users chose which combination of OS/Hypervisor/ACS versions to deploy for a stable and fully supported environment. For

Re: [PROPOSE] EOL for supported OSes & Hypervisors

This is the type of discussion that I wanted to open - the argument that I see for earlier dropping of v6 is that - Between May 2018 and q2 2020 RHEL/CentOS 6.x will only receive security and mission critical updates, meanwhile packages on which we depend or may want to utilise in the future

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Daan, For us and i guess for many others public cloud and vps providers its very big hole. Imagine that 10-20 chinese guys have made fraud orders and 10-20 vps are provisioned. We dealing with fradulent orders daily basis. Some time later abusers will get catch in the act and vpses will be

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Hi Kristian, Can you test and confirm that you can reproduce the issue with 4.11.0.0-rc1? - Rohit From: Kristian Liivak Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:10:17 PM To: users Cc: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

please discuss on the VOTE thread Kristian. Give your -1 with explanation there. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Kristian Liivak wrote: > Daan, > > For us and i guess for many others public cloud and vps providers its very > big hole. > Imagine that 10-20 chinese guys have

RE: [PROPOSE] EOL for supported OSes & Hypervisors

Hi Eric, This is the type of discussion that I wanted to open - the argument that I see for earlier dropping of v6 is that - Between May 2018 and q2 2020 RHEL/CentOS 6.x will only receive security and mission critical updates, meanwhile packages on which we depend or may want to utilise in the

RE: Not able to create the Secondary Storage and Console proxy Vms

Hi Dickson, From your logs: (logid:03136d96) System VMs will use shared storage for zone id=1 No storage pools available for shared volume allocation, returning It looks like you don't have any shared storage configured - were you planning to use local storage instead? If so you need to set the

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

Hi Rohit, Im currenlty moving our office to new location and therefore busy at least week. After that i can set up test enviroment and make all tests. Lugupidamisega / Regards Kristian Liivak WaveCom As Endla 16, 10142 Tallinn Estonia Tel: +3726850001 Gsm: +37256850001 E-mail:

Re: LVM support for KVM

Hi, Rodrigo. AFAIK raw is supported for KVM, but LVM2 would be a great option indeed, but It looks like nobody works on that option currently. 2018-01-17 1:40 GMT+07:00 Rodrigo Baldasso : > Hi everyone, > > Is there any roadmap for supporting LVM/raw disks on kvm? The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi everyone, For the past couple days, I have been running the KVM managed-storage regression-test suite against RC1. With the exception of one issue (more on this below), all of these tests have passed. Tomorrow I plan to start in on the VMware-related managed-storage tests. Once I’ve

LVM support for KVM

Hi everyone, Is there any roadmap for supporting LVM/raw disks on kvm? The mainly reason here for us to keep our legacy virtualization system is that. Even if snapshot wasn't possible using lvm, it would be great. Thanks!