Cloudstack Still Trying to connect to secondary storage NFS after removing it.

Hi Guys My cloud stack management server still wants to connect to a secondary NFS server. We have shutdown the NFS storage and we removed it from Cloudstack management via UI in the secondary storage area, we made sure to migrate all its existing data to another secondary NFS prior. But

RE: VM Firewalls In Between Subnets

+1 to that -Original Message- From: Stephan Bienek Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 9:15 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: VM Firewalls In Between Subnets Hi Bryan, sure you can, for example using multiple L2 networks connected to your virtual appliance. L2 network

Re: VM Firewalls In Between Subnets

Hi Bryan, sure you can, for example using multiple L2 networks connected to your virtual appliance. L2 network will not interfere with any services of your appliance, as there is no virtual router involved. Spreading the VMs to the different L2 networks, their only way to communicate is via

Re: Creating a CloudStack AutoScale VM Group with Terraform

Raised issues and hope AutoScale will enable with terraform soon. Thank you. On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 8:57 PM, Kiran Chavala wrote: > Hi Palash > > Could you please log a improvement issue here for creating autoscale vm > groups via terraform > >

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release

Hi all, Thanks a lot Daan for cleaning up the 4.19.0.0 milestone [1]. Now we have around 123 open items in the milestone. We still have some interesting features and enhancements in progress. In addition to this, we are seeing some recurring test failures on the PRs including health-check which

Re: VM Firewalls In Between Subnets

Hi Bryan, sure you can, for example using multiple L2 networks connected to your virtual appliance. L2 network will not interfere with any services of your appliance, as there is no virtual router involved. Spreading the VMs to the different L2 networks, their only way to communicate is via

Re: Proxmox and cloudstack

morning! In my experience, I was able to migrate VM disks that had been created in Proxmox, without any difficulty. The only detail is to ensure that in Proxmox the VM disks are in QCOW2 format. Being in QCOW2, simply upload the disk as a template to Cloudstack and then create the VM using this

Re: Proxmox and cloudstack

Hi, no problem at all. Вт, 21 нояб. 2023 г. в 16:30, Gary Dixon : > I believe Windows based VM's in Proxmox have an issue on booting up > properly when on KVM hosts. We are also seeing this in Cloudstack > > > Gary Dixon​ > Senior Technical Consultant > 0161 537 4980 <0161%20537%204980> > +44

Re: Proxmox and cloudstack

Proxmox everything is good and convenience . The only issue is do not have IP management where you have to manage your own IP allocation manually. Cloudstack have very difficult issue. is on Changing compute offering. / Scalling of a VM . Example，if you want to upgrade the ram from eg 3G to 4G,

Re: Proxmox and cloudstack

I didn't have a problem here either (with Windows Server editions). If it is a Windows Desktop edition that requires the TPM security component (for example Windows 11), it is also possible to boot, but it requires adjustments to the KVM virtualization host. On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:40 AM Ivan

VM Templates - ROOT DISK link

Guys, when we create a new VM from a template, it seems to me that a new disk is created as if it were a snapshot, linked to the original template file (qcow2 backing file link). Is there any way to avoid this link, creating a complete clone of the template disk and attaching it exclusively to

Re: Proxmox and cloudstack

Cloudstack has custom compute offering, it allows for changing cores, ram, etc. But, in general, Proxmox can be more convenient for small deployments when a single server is enough. Вт, 21 нояб. 2023 г. в 16:56, Hean Seng : > Proxmox everything is good and convenience . The only issue is do not

Re: Proxmox and cloudstack

However, it could be a great option to have Cloudstack as an orchestration mechanism for Proxmox working on Proxmox tooling without highly obscure and hard-to-troubleshoot Cloudstack router, savm, cpvm. Just dreaming :) Вт, 21 нояб. 2023 г. в 16:59, Ivan Kudryavtsev : > Cloudstack has custom

Re: Bank Client requires VM Firewall in between subnets

Not Cloudstack integrated, but would pfsense/opnsense be an option? - Steve On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 3:13 AM Bryan Tiang wrote: > Hi Daan, > > Ive attached a diagram of what the client is requesting for. > > > Hope this helps? > > Regards, > Bryan > On 21 Nov 2023 at 3:55 PM +0800, Daan

Proxmox and cloudstack

Morning guys, Has anyone tested the compatibility between proxmox and cloudstack. Cloudstack does support KVM, and proxmox uses kvm, but I would like to hear some feedbacks. Thanks as asual Regards

RE: Proxmox and cloudstack

I believe Windows based VM's in Proxmox have an issue on booting up properly when on KVM hosts. We are also seeing this in Cloudstack Gary Dixon Senior Technical Consultant 0161 537 4980 +44 7989717661 gary.di...@quadris.co.uk www.quadris.com Innovation House, 12-13 Bredbury Business Park

XCP-NG 8.2 and Linux Bridging

In the documentation, I see that Linux bridging is still mentioned for XenServer 6.1 installs. I understand we are past that, but is Linux bridging still required when using Advanced networking with security groups? Is CS not compatible with the OVS? Regards, Marty

RE: VM Firewalls In Between Subnets

Thank You, Gentlemen. Will give this a try! On 21 Nov 2023 at 7:14 PM +0800, Alex Mattioli , wrote: > +1 to that > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Stephan Bienek > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 9:15 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: VM Firewalls In Between

Re: XCP-NG 8.2 and Linux Bridging

Hi, OVS/XS should be supported. doc may be out of date. -Wei On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 21:15, Marty Godsey wrote: > In the documentation, I see that Linux bridging is still mentioned for > XenServer 6.1 installs. I understand we are past that, but is Linux > bridging still required when using