Hi Melanie and Stephan,
Thanks for logging and glad none of these are show stoppers for you.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 06/04/2018, 13:07, "Melanie Desaive" wrote:
Hi Dag,
Stephan and I posted the issues we encountered after
Hi Parth,
No problem, glad I could help. Let us know how you get on with the dummy
interface bridge.
With regards to your tagging question – yes this is quite a big and complicated
topic. Suffice to summarise it as follows:
- Basic zones use a larger L3 network, and guest isolation is done by
Hi Dag,
Thank you for guiding me, i know it's a weird use case and probably would
never be required in a production environment. I will definitely try to
make a dummy interface and give it to the guest network target bridge. I
know it would be out of the scope of this email trail for you to
Hi Dag,
Stephan and I posted the issues we encountered after upgrading to 4.11
on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues.
Those are:
Admin Dashboard System Capacity broken with German Locale #2539
problem adding new shared network NIC to VM "A NIC with this MAC address
exits for network:"
Hi Parth,
Take a look through the full email trail – I think we discussed this earlier
on. In short the answer is no – by definition you can not run completely
untagged isolated networks in an advanced zone – but “tagged” means different
things for L2 and L3 isolation. The real answer - “it
Hi Dag,
Thanks for the response. I am currently looking into VLANs and network
configuration for my case. But I want to know one thing: are "untagged"
VLAN networks sufficient for an advanced zone to function with two
networks? I did not state I do not want to use VLANs for networking but I
Thanks guys, got it fixed by installing the virto drivers from fedora site
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:56 PM, soundar rajan
wrote:
> hypervisor deployed on KVM centos
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
> sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com> wrote:
>
Hi Parth,
Keep in mind you are in unchartered waters – so there may be some stumbling
blocks before you get this to work.
I suspect what you have to do is change cloudbr1 such that it is backed by a
fake or dummy ethernet interface. What seems to happen is the agent script
looks for the
hypervisor deployed on KVM centos
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com> wrote:
> What hypervisor the windows vm is deployed on?
>
> Regards,
> Sateesh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: soundar rajan
> Reply-To:
What hypervisor the windows vm is deployed on?
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: soundar rajan
Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 12:59 PM
To: "d...@cloudstack.apache.org"
I am able to view the disk in linux vm centos. The same not working in
windows. Do i need to install any additional package in windows server?
I tried rebooting the windows vm didnt work.
Please help!!
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:56 AM, soundar rajan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Hi Dag,
When I tried your method and created a NIC-less bridge, following are the
contents of my ifcfg-* network files:
*ifcfg-cloudbr0:*
TYPE=Bridge
PROXY_METHOD=none
BROWSER_ONLY=no
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=cloudbr0
UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
Hi,
I have created a 5 GB volume in the storage and attached the volume to a vm
status shows ready and success
when i login to the vm and access the disk management i dont see that disk
inside the windows server.
Tried rescan disk option no luck any idea?
OS: Windows Server 2012 R2
cloudstack
13 matches
Mail list logo