Re: [D] Test Discussion [cloudstack]

GitHub user NuxRo added a comment to the discussion: Test Discussion yo GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8344#discussioncomment-7818945 This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: users-unsubsc

Re: [D] Test Discussion [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud closed the discussion with a comment: Test Discussion Closing this, looks like messages are ending up on the users mailing list now. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8344#discussioncomment-7819002 This is an automatically sent ema

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! Testing - if this message ends up on the users mailing list. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343#discussioncomment-7819017 This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.a

Re: [D] Test Discussion [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud closed a discussion: Test Discussion Testing if this ends on the users mailing list. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8344 This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to:

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud deleted a comment on the discussion: Hello World! Testing comment -> this should land to users@ ML otherwise we would need to consult/ask ASF infra. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343#discussioncomment-7818425 This is an automa

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! does it? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343#discussioncomment-7829885 This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: use

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user borisstoyanov added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! is there a way to make it two-way integrated with users@, for example not only a copy is being sent to users@, but if someone replies there we get the response here? Certainly this is much better experience than emails,

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user borisstoyanov added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! Also we could probably pin a locked discussion on top in the 'discussions' tab where we describe what and where to find all discussions and this is a secondary option for discussing at the moment? GitHub link: https:/

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! Yes, looks like we can pin upto 4-5 discussions on the https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343#discussioncomment-7840023 This is an aut

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! voting should not be on users, but on dev@ @borisstoyanov . also I do not think we should do voting here, anything discussed here can be taken to the list, can it? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discu

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! Hi Bobby, I thought replying to emails directly should work. same as github pull request/issues. I have no idea if the integration with the @users mailing list is feasible or not. Not every email address is linked to a gi

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! Hi Bobby, I thought replying to emails directly should work. same as github pull request/issues. I have no idea if the integration with the @users mailing list is feasible or not. Not every email address is linked to a gi

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user borisstoyanov added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! I don't think you understand me correct Daan, there's no mention of voting here. What I've said is about the concerns raised in discussion and vote threads earlier on mailing lists. GitHub link: https://github.com/apa

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Hello World! sorry, last word in your comment was "voting" GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343#discussioncomment-7850735 This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org. To unsu

Re: [D] Oracle Linux KVM Support for CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Oracle Linux KVM Support for CloudStack ol8 and ol9 are supported as regular el varyities. Older vversions were supported by specific OL plugins but that was less stable and mature. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack

Re: [D] Oracle Linux KVM Support for CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Oracle Linux KVM Support for CloudStack Both Oracle Linux 8 and 9 are RHEL clones and therefore supported as management server and KVM hosts with Apache CloudStack. We regularly run smoketests on pull requests against ol8/ol9. We

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud closed a discussion: Hello World! Hello community, started a test discussion to check the integration between Github and users@ mailing list. Feel free to use for any test/playground, and discuss how to better use Github Discussions for our CloudStack community. Gi

Re: [D] Hello World! [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud closed the discussion with a comment: Hello World! Closing this :) GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343#discussioncomment-8300318 This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an

Re: [D] Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk @vonlo123 , did you investigate restricting the API for adjusting the diskoffering? I expect you would want to disallow the use of https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.18/ap

Re: [D] Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk @vonlo123 there is a global setting `allow.diskoffering.change.during.scale.vm` you can change the value to `true` and retry GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/dis

Re: [D] Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk [cloudstack]

GitHub user vonlo123 added a comment to the discussion: Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk Hello @weizhouapache we have changed the setting to `true` but the problem still remains. We can only choose a different compute offering when `disk offering strictness` is set to `fa

Re: [D] Oracle Linux KVM Support for CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user farhad-aslam closed a discussion: Oracle Linux KVM Support for CloudStack Is oracle Linux based KVM supported as a hypervisor with CloudStack? I cannot see it anywhere in the documentation. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8572 This is an automat

Re: [D] Oracle Linux KVM Support for CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud closed the discussion with a comment: Oracle Linux KVM Support for CloudStack The latest 4.19 release notes compatibility matrix fixed that. @farhad-aslam closing on this remark. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8572#discussioncomment-

Re: [D] Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk [cloudstack]

GitHub user vonlo123 added a comment to the discussion: Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk We solved this issue by denying _updateDIskOffering_ `disk offering strictness` needs to be set to `false` But this only works when the root disk in the compute offering has the _Pro

Re: [D] Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk Do you mean that the the user can still call `updateDiskOffering` despite it being denied in their role? With thin provisioning the initial size should be just what is really used a

Re: [D] EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC [cloudstack]

GitHub user tobzsc edited a discussion: EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC Hello everyone, we are still in the process of setting up our cloud environment and could use some advice. We are using BGP+EVPN+VXLAN in our setup, quite similar to how it's described here

Re: [D] EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC [cloudstack]

GitHub user wido added a comment to the discussion: EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC We are running such setups :-) So just to check: IPv4 works just fine in the same VNI? Can you check if you could ping the Link-Local address from any of the routers from any of the VMs? And could you maybe post

Re: [D] EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC [cloudstack]

GitHub user tobzsc added a comment to the discussion: EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC I know you do ;) First some background information. We are using an EVPN+MPLS setup in our Juniper backbone which is providing connectivity. We have two gateways (MX204) which in this case terminate on two spi

Re: [D] EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC [cloudstack]

GitHub user wido added a comment to the discussion: EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC Can both routers ping eachother via iPv6? And have you also looked at this blog: https://danhearty.wordpress.com/2019/10/12/evpn-vxlan-layer-3-gateway-irb-junos/ A few things: - I think I have seen this before...

Re: [D] Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk [cloudstack]

GitHub user NuxRo added a comment to the discussion: Changing compute offering / scaling VM and root disk @DaanHoogland perhaps `resizeVolume` is the culprit here. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8578#discussioncomment-8565785 This is an automatically sent

Re: [D] EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC [cloudstack]

GitHub user tobzsc added a comment to the discussion: EVPN-VXLAN - IPv6 via SLAAC Finally, we found the problem which is related to VXLAN flags. When IPv6 multicast packets enter our fabric the VXLAN packet somehow gets the flags `0x0a00` instead of `0x0800`, which is being ignored by the ker

Re: [D] logging standards in CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user JoaoJandre added a comment to the discussion: logging standards in CloudStack Here are some guidelines I think would be a good start (adapted from @DaanHoogland 's post on the mailing list) Fatal: - Include a reason why the system can not function anymore; - Be followed by a Syste

Re: [D] logging standards in CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: logging standards in CloudStack I like your summary @JoaoJandre except for the error bit: > Error: > > * Include a reason why the system can not execute a user request or > why part of the system is degraded; > > * If

Re: [D] logging standards in CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: logging standards in CloudStack I believe that adding an error message in `ERROR` followed by the stack trace in `DEBUG` is not so interesting. For instance, if we have the `INFO` level enabled and an exception occurs, we would not s

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @sbrueseke are you addressing (designing/implementing a solution to) this bug? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8953#discussioncomment-9174417 ---

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled Hey @sbrueseke , I finally got a chance to look at this again.If you are using NFS this is how it is supposed to work , I think. If you are using LinStor, see the merged PR for

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > @sbrueseke are you addressing (designing/implementing a solution to) this bug? I'm not deep enough into the topic to suggest a solution. We noticed the bug because we were carry

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts when the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when any HA setting is disabled in the UI? Do

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts when > > the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when any HA > > setting is disabled i

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user dseralathan added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled heartbeat[13962]: kvmheartbeat.sh will reboot system because it was unable to write the heartbeat to the storage. I received the same error when my Primary NFS Storage was in a

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > > > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts when > > > the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when any HA > > > setting is

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user andrijapanicsb added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled afaik, this has 0 things to do with host HA, VM HA or anything else. This scrip (kvmspheartbeat.sh) has been there for last 12 years (that I'm aware of) - and it only checks i

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @weizhouapache I would suggest to take another look into that and change it default. In my opinion a host should not automatically reboot at all if no settings are configured. Fro

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > > > > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts > > > > when the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when > > > > any HA setting i

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > > > > > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts > > > > > when the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when > > > > > any HA

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @sbrueseke , I beg to differ, when storage can not be reached all VMs will be running on read-only disks from there on in. This means the hosts is useless and VMs need to rebo

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > afaik, this has 0 things to do with host HA, VM HA or anything else. This > scrip (kvmspheartbeat.sh) has been there for last 12 years (that I'm aware > of) - and it only che

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > @weizhouapache I would suggest to take another look into that and change it > default. In my opinion a host should not automatically reboot at all if no > settings are confi

Re: [D] Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke edited a discussion: Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) # ISSUE TYPE * Bug Report # COMPONENT NAME ~~~ HA ~~~ # CLOUDSTACK VERSION ~~~ 4.19.0 ~~~ # CONFIGURATION # OS / ENVIRONMENT # SUMM

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user adidiborg added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @sbrueseke, We are also facing similar issue, but as per our logs ( on all KVM ) we are only seeing below log lines - ``` Feb 19 12:01:08 kvm-2 java[9465]: WARN [kvm.resource.KVM

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts when the > host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when any HA setting > is disabled in

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user slavkap added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled Hi all, KVMHAMonitor is initialized when the agent host is started (without knowing if HA is enabled/disabled). It is used either when Host HA is enabled to check the host. If ther

Re: [D] logging standards in CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: logging standards in CloudStack I didn't know about the stacktrace limit option, that is good. > Another point is that we would have to change the whole code base to comply > with this standard. This is true what ever we decide, but

Re: [D] logging standards in CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland edited a comment on the discussion: logging standards in CloudStack I didn't know about the stacktrace limit option, that is good. > Another point is that we would have to change the whole code base to comply > with this standard. This is true what ever we decide, bu

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release Are there any api changes? As far as I understand version 8.3 should work as long as the used api calls are still working. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user ydirson added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release No API breakage, only introduction of new APIs for new functionalities (e.g. vTPM) GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9209551 This is an automatically se

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user shwstppr added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release We may need to add some changes for hypervisor support, similar to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4672 (maybe part of it) GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussi

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user shwstppr edited a comment on the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release We may need to add some changes for hypervisor support, similar to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4672 (maybe part of it). But this will be done after release in my opinion. GitHub link: https://g

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user outbackdingo added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release not sure how their xoa lite will affect it, as its on and installed by default on 8.3, anyway willing to test GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9213608

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release Good to hear! It's been a while since xcp-ng had a release. If it is backward compatible wrt API, usage and guest OS then adding support would be a straightforward entry in the hypervisor support relate

Re: [D] Enhancing CloudStack Management UI Accessibility with Keyboard Shortcuts [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Enhancing CloudStack Management UI Accessibility with Keyboard Shortcuts Good to hear @apurv-1 - after struggling to get your PR in, we abandoned our own effort mainly due to support with vue3 and latest ant-d. If you're up for th

Re: [D] Define a release schedule for the project [cloudstack]

GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: Define a release schedule for the project Hello guys, Thanks @JoaoJandre for raising the discussion. Many might understand the benefits and the necessity of having a well-defined versioning schema; however, I feel that it is importa

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user ydirson added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release xo-lite should not have any impact, it's just another client of the same API GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9214408 This is an automatically sent emai

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user outbackdingo added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release good to know, be interesting to see 8.3 and CS working GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9214727 This is an automatically sent email for users@clou

Re: [D] Define a release schedule for the project [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Define a release schedule for the project @GutoVeronezi points to the more abstract reasons we want to allow breaking changes. We have long had a list of more mondain reasons to introduce breaking changes: - API truly restful - ORM/DA

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? I think a shared network with vlan=untagged is what you need. You can use an advanced zone or advanced zone with security groups, or even a basic zone. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloud

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Thanks! After several pages in the documentation[1], I was able to complete the installation. - [x] System-VM consoleproxy, Up and running - [x] System-VM secondarystoragevm, Up and running

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @dR3b Is IP forwarding enabled? The following command should return 1 cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8998#discussioncomment-925547

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? Yes! ``` root@nuc1:/# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 1 ``` GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8998#discussioncomment-9258076 This is an automatically sent email for users

Re: [D] Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) [cloudstack]

GitHub user bkrajendra added a comment to the discussion: Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) Recently I also started getting this issue: ``` Apr 27 07:50:33 pnqsun java: WARN [kvm.resource.KVMHAMonitor] (Thread-1:) (logid:) Write heartbeat for poo

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Thanks! After several pages in the documentation[1], I was able to complete the installation. - [x] System-VM consoleproxy, Up and running - [x] System-VM secondarystoragevm, Up and runnin

Re: [D] Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) [cloudstack]

GitHub user bkrajendra edited a comment on the discussion: Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) CloudStack 4.17.0.1 Recently I also started getting this issue: ``` Apr 27 07:50:33 pnqsun java: WARN [kvm.resource.KVMHAMonitor] (Thread-1:) (logid:)

Re: [D] Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) [cloudstack]

GitHub user bkrajendra edited a comment on the discussion: Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) CloudStack 4.17.0.1 Recently I also started getting this issue: ``` Apr 27 07:50:33 host java: WARN [kvm.resource.KVMHAMonitor] (Thread-1:) (logid:) Wr

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Yes! ``` root@nuc1:/# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 1 ``` GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8998#discussioncomment-9258076 This is an automatically sent

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @dR3b a user has replied to to this thread in the users mailing list, no idea why it is not present here ![image](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/assets/57355700/cc9f9b3e-09e9-47f7-ba23-1b8b0

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Thanks! This works, but deletes all Iptables rules on the host. I have not created any rules myself. These rules must be from Cloudstack or UFW. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/clouds

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Thanks! This works, but deletes all the IPtable rules on the host. I have not created any rules myself. These rules must be from Cloudstack or UFW. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/c

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache ``` root@nuc1:/# apt install cloudstack-agent Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be install

Re: [D] Apache Cloud Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent ) [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Apache Cloud Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent ) @therev3l4 the general steps to debug this is to look at the management-server and agent logs to see why it failed. Since this looks like an initial setup issue with no

Re: [D] Apache Cloud Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent ) [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Apache Cloud Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent ) @therev3l4 did you allow root ssh based login with password or ssh-key? What installation guide or steps have you followed ? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/clo

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources > I did some further investigation and it seems I do not have to add the user > to the wheel group. If I add the host for the first time I receive the error: > > ``` > Error 5

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources Same as https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8824 - sounds like setup/config issue of kvm/libvirtd GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/901

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template! GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9019#discussioncomment-9278

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user KobesM added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources I solved the issue by adding the user I used to connect to the KVM host to the wheel group. I do not know if this is actually required since it is not documented as such. GitHub lin

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources > I solved the issue by adding the user I used to connect to the KVM host to > the wheel group. I do not know if this is actually required since it is not > documented as such

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user KobesM added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources I did some further investigation and it seems I do not have to add the user to the wheel group. If I add the host for the first time I receive the error: ``` Error 530 Unable to add t

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x @Gunseerat do you use a non-root user ? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9020#discussioncomment-9278655 This is an automa

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user Gunseerat added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x I do not understand what server resources is it referencing to... GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9020#discussioncomment-9278657

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user printfdebugging added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources I was getting the same error. Turns out that reading the log files helps, as a log file is cloudstack's way of communicating back what's the issue. I searched for "server re

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user Gunseerat added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x @rajujith yes sir the hypervisor is kvm selected while creating host @weizhouapache I have added all permissions in sudoers file also GitHub link: https://github

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x > @rajujith yes sir the hypervisor is kvm selected while creating host > @weizhouapache I have added all permissions in sudoers file also @Gunseerat and whe

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user yashi4engg added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 @rajujith -- cloudstack version 4.19 , Hypervisor - KVM with OEL8 , We have mysql and cloudstack mgmt installed on same node where mysql is ssl enabled. GitHub link: http

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x @Gunseerat can you check whether you have selected the hypervisor type as KVM while adding cluster and host? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 @yashi4engg could you share the cloudstack and hypervisor type and version where this issue is observed? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9021#di

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x same as https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8851 - looks like kvm setup issue. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9020#

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 can you destroy CPVM and retry ? @yashi4engg GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9021#discussioncomment-9278686 This is an automatically se

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user yashi4engg added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 All packages for 4.19 as this is new setup with 4.19 . KVM hypervisors with OEL8.9. mysql is ssl enabled. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9021#

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 FIPS isn't a support config yet I think @yashi4engg cc @weizhouapache can advise. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9021#discussioncomment-92

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 > @weizhouapache WE have enabled FIPS for hosts and cloudstack and then it > started giving VNc console errors. Each cloudstack VM has a VNC password. unfortunately it is n

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user yashi4engg added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 @weizhouapache -- All VMs facing same issue . GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9021#discussioncomment-9278689 This is an automatically sent

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >