Re: 4.11 without Host-HA framework

Thanks Jon. I've been following that thread too, have now much clear understanding of how VM HA behaves in cloudstack. Thanks for finding a bug and saving time of others :) Regards, Parth Patel On Mon 11 Jun, 2018, 16:30 Jon Marshall, wrote: > Hi Parth > > > Just in case you have

Re: 4.11 without Host-HA framework

://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/7/4.11/ Regards, Parth Patel On Thu, 24 May 2018 at 10:53 Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > I'm afraid that is not a host crash. When shutting down the guest OS, the > CloudStack agent on the host is still able to report to the management > server

Re: CloudStack 4.11 and CCS - shapeblue

and 4.9 (I've tried and failed). I've implemented it with ACS 4.6 and it works fine. Hope the CloudStack community comes up with a container orchestration solution like OpenStack's Magnum. Regards, Parth Patel On Thu 19 Apr, 2018, 16:19 Henko Holtzhausen, < henko.holtzhau...@shapeblue.com>

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

Hi Dag, Thanks a lot It worked. Now I can mess around and learn how to configure VPC, autoscale and try my shot at ShapeBlue Container Service Plugin. Appreciate your help. Regards, Parth Patel On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 18:17 Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> wrote: >

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

to explain me tagged and untagged networking in L2 and L3 networks, but I would search around the internet and ping this thread if I'm again stuck at some specific issue after I reach my university's lab. Appreciate your help. Thanks, Parth Patel On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 17:06 Dag Sonstebo <dag.so

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

appreciate the advice. I will look into this more and see what I can do with it. Thanks, Parth Patel On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 13:59 Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi Parth, > > Keep in mind you are in unchartered waters – so there may be some > stumbling blocks

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

onException: Incorrect Network setup on agent, Reinitialize agent after network names are setup, details : Can not find network: cloudbr1 2018-04-04 02:04:24,046 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentConnectTaskPool-1:ctx-0bf7b058) (logid:f7a4d646) Can not send command com.cloud.agent.api.ReadyCommand due to

Re: Not able to import template from internal network

? Regards, Parth Patel On Tue 3 Apr, 2018, 17:17 Swastik Mittal, <mittal.swas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Soundar > > Do you have your sshd services available on your internal network. > > On 3 Apr 2018 3:47 p.m., "soundar rajan" <bsoundara...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

ag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > On 29/03/2018, 11:14, "Parth Patel" <parthpatel2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

d to understand most of them). I am especially stuck at understanding this "tagging" of VLANs. Thanks, Parth Patel On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 at 15:17 Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi Parth, > > Yes and no. > > No – you cannot do advanced zones with *all

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

such as load balancing and auto scaling without netscaler device. For that I badly need Advanced Zone networking (especially isolated networks offerings). I just want to know if Advanced Zone can succesfully function with two networks, one physcial NIC and no VLAN tagging. Thanks, Parth Patel

Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

ng as I am doing this project in my university. But, I have requested and gained access to the mentioned two networks: 192.168.20.0/24 and 172.16.20.0/16 and both networks are pingable and have internet access across all three machines. Can anyone help me with this please? Thanks, Parth Patel

Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues

+1 On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 at 21:25 Glenn Wagner wrote: > +1 > > glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Winter Suite, 1st Floor, The Avenues, Drama Street, Somerset West, Cape > Town 7129South Africa > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From:

Re: Container Service Requirements

to implement Network [225||17]... Do I need a separate physical NIC or manually need to create a separate bridge for the same NIC for the guest network? (I don't know if it is possible to create two bridges using different networks using one physical NIC) Thanks, Parth Patel On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 at 13:49

Container Service Requirements

? It would be beneficial if anyone who has successfully configured Shapeblue CCS service shares their implementation details or tell me if I am missing something. Thanks, Parth Patel

Re: KVM HostHA

-enabled VM has stopped executing and it restarts the HA-enabled VM on another host. Hope this helps. Regards, Parth Patel. > > > > From: Parth Patel <parthpatel2...@gmail.com> > Sent: 14 March 2018 14:36 > To: users@cloudstack.apac

Re: KVM HostHA

, but I think my current ACS 4.11 installation has features (at least performs some ;) provided by Host HA without configuring it or ipmi. Regards, Parth Patel On Wed 14 Mar, 2018, 18:41 Boris Stoyanov, <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > yes, KVM + NFS shared storage.

Re: CCS (Cloudstack Container Service) in CloudStack 4.11

Oh, ok. Thanks for the info Daan. On Tue 13 Mar, 2018, 23:32 Daan Hoogland, <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Don't bother. Ccs will not work with 4.9 > > Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico > > On 13 Mar 2018 18:05, "Parth Patel" <parthpatel2

Re: CCS (Cloudstack Container Service) in CloudStack 4.11

Hi Da'an, I will give that a try, till then I will try the ccs first with ACS 4.9 :P Thanks, Parth Patel On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 17:39 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Parth, The plugin 1.0 won't work with any version beyond 4.9 (4.7 and 4.7 > aren't tested). There

Re: KVM HostHA

that there is nothing it can do, as the VMs are still > running other than mark the hosts as degraded. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Paul Angus > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > [http://w

Re: KVM HostHA

> > Hi Jon, > > As I said, in my case, making the host HA didn't work but by just having a > HA VM running on host and executing - (WARNING) "echo c > > /proc/sysrq-trigger" to simulate a kernel crash on host, the management > server registered it as down and started the VM on another host. I know

Re: KVM HostHA

Hi Victor, I too had a similar failover requirement. I also got on the path of making an HA-enabled KVM host in CS 4.9 after doing the same steps you performed but in CS 4.9 where the agent got in "Alert" state but not in "Down" state. However, if your requirement is simply that in case a host

Re: Cloud (Infrastructure reselling) = VPC ?

ample, etc) > > Then, white-labeling with custom CSS and logos, etc... :) > > Cheers > > On 4 March 2018 at 10:33, Parth Patel <parthpatel2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you DAG and Ivan. I will go ahead with this. > > > > On Sun 4 Mar, 2018, 14:08 Ivan Ku

Re: Cloud (Infrastructure reselling) = VPC ?

hen in each account you > > can configure a VPC or simple isolated network for the webservers. > > > > Hope this helps, > > Dag Sonstebo > > > > Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > > > > From: Parth Pa

Cloud (Infrastructure reselling) = VPC ?

and user permission control but did not find much. From my understanding what I need to create is a VPC (Virtual Private Cloud) offering for each client. right ? can anybody guide me on this, I just want to know I am heading in right direction. Regards, Parth Patel

Re: HA-enabled VM not starting or migrating to another host if current host goes down

Hi Sean, Thank you for the reply. I was already testing Cloudstack and now tried the same with 4.11. It works as it should in Cloudstack 4.11. However, I think that pull request should work and will test it out with remaining 3 machines with Cloudstack 4.9. Regards, Parth Patel On Fri, 2 Mar

Re: Cloudstack 4.11 fails to add KVM host

has tried to connect to the management server 4 times. Not necessarily the same issue that Daznis is facing, but I think its somewhat related and maybe I need more understanding of the mechanism management server and agents use to handle a failover scenario. Regards, Parth Patel On Thu, 1 Mar 2018

Re: HA-enabled VM not starting or migrating to another host if current host goes down

Hi Simon, I'm using KVM hypervisor. On Sun 25 Feb, 2018, 01:41 Simon Weller, <swel...@ena.com.invalid> wrote: > Which hypervisor are you using? > > Simon Weller/615-312-6068 > > -Original Message- > From: Parth Patel [parthpatel2...@gmail.com] > Received: Sat

HA-enabled VM not starting or migrating to another host if current host goes down

e instance on another suitable host (of which there are 2). I tried searching some feature like this in Cloudstack administration docs but could not find anything fitting to this scenario. Regards, Parth Patel

HA-enabled VM not starting or migrating to another host if current host goes down

e instance on another suitable host (of which there are 2). I tried searching some feature like this in Cloudstack administration docs but could not find anything fitting to this scenario. Regards, Parth Patel