Re: Deploy Cloudstack on Debian 12

I've some notes on Debian here - https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/fc401a0fe8e8ea16b4b3a4e3d149ce0c Last time I tested it worked for me. Regards. From: lists Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 13:25 To: users Subject: Re: Deploy Cloudstack on Debian

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

on one host-tag (that could related to an arch) vs deploy Y number of VMs on others. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 21:45 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav Subject: Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple

Re: cloudstack-agent mismatch size

Hi Francisco, all, We've in process of publishing the new 4.18.2.0 release, due to which the repo metadata has been changed. The download.cloudstack.org repo is served by CDN77 (I've purged the cache and changed caching timeout from 12hrs to 1hr) and can have caching issue around the time an

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0 RC2

+1 (binding) I've built and uploaded the 4.18.2.0 RC2 packages here for people's convenience - http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.18.2.0-rc2/ * Tested upgrade from 4.18.1.1 to 4.18.2.0 RC packages -ok * Rebuilt systemvms (ssvm and cpvm) - ok * Restart network - ok * New VM

Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS

Rohit, It is possible to install CAPC on a CS 4.16 ? Le jeu. 11 avr. 2024 à 12:03, Rohit Yadav a écrit : > Hi Benoit, > > The CKS feature has been improving over versions, I don't know if what > you're trying to achieve is possible with it. Maybe try a different version >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

Thanks Kiran and all for the excellent release work. There has been some issue with publishing the v0.5.0 on the Terraform registry, for this I've logged a support ticket with the TF Registry. In the meanwhile, users can use the following to install the provider locally using artifacts from

Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS

Hi Benoit, The CKS feature has been improving over versions, I don't know if what you're trying to achieve is possible with it. Maybe try a different version of the data iso: http://download.cloudstack.org/cks/ Alternatively, you can also have a look at the CAPC project:

Re: Repositories

Hi Jimmy, They both are largely hosting the same upstream packages with some differences. Those on the download.cloudstack.org are built and maintained by the wider community largely comprising of the ACS PMC members (many of whom are ShapeBlue colleagues). The ShapeBlue packages are built,

Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva

Welcome aboard Slavka! Regards. From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 6:16:00 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva Congratulations Slavka!

[ADVISORY] Apache CloudStack Security Releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1

Apache CloudStack security releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1 address the CVEs listed below. Affected users are recommended to upgrade their CloudStack installations. 1. CVE-2024-29006: x-forwarded-for HTTP header parsed by default Severity: moderate Description: By default the CloudStack

[ADVISORY] Apache CloudStack Security Releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1

Apache CloudStack security releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1 address the CVEs listed below. Affected users are recommended to upgrade their CloudStack installations. 1. CVE-2024-29006: x-forwarded-for HTTP header parsed by default Severity: moderate Description: By default the CloudStack

Re: cloudstack 4.19 filesize mismatch

mismatch now are failing both 4.18 and 4.19 Regards On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 6:13 PM Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Francisco, > > The repo CDN is being updated, sometimes files are out of sync. Can you > run apt-get update and try again and keep us posted if you still face the > iss

Re: cloudstack 4.19 filesize mismatch

Hi Francisco, The repo CDN is being updated, sometimes files are out of sync. Can you run apt-get update and try again and keep us posted if you still face the issue. Regards. From: Francisco Arencibia Quesada Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 8:39:23 PM To:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

+1 (binding) Tested vm deployment using 0.5.0-pre. Regards. From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 2:55:40 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0 Hi ALL

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v6.4.0

# Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v6.4.0 Release Apache CloudStack, proven as one of the most scalable, free and open source cloud computing operating system for large scale private, public, and hybrid clouds, today announced the availability of the latest release of Apache CloudMonkey v6.4.0, the

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. And I'll publish the Github release as latest. Regards, Rohit Yadav On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 16:08, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following > artifacts up for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

All, Reminder - cmk 6.4.0 RC1 is up for testing and voting. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 4:08:29 PM To: dev ; users Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1 Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 release

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel Salvador

in congratulating Daniel, the new CloudStack PMC Chair / VP. Best Regards, Rohit Yadav

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commit/df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 Commit: df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 GitHub pre-release

Re: [DISCUSS] Next cmk release

All, Since we haven't heard of any issue/feature requests and the ones in the current milestone are all done. I'll start a vote on this today. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/milestone/5 Thanks and regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

/regressions at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 18:34 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

All, Kiran is release manager for the next Terraform provider release (v0.5.0) but isn't a committer to have commit privileges to the upstream repo (something PMC can help into?). To assist him, I've created a pre-RC (alpha) build for testing purposes and we encourage users to test and report

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

As I understand Daan's vote proposal and from the previous discussion thread, the current scheme that results in a release like 4.20.x.y would simply become 20.a.b, wherein "a" is for maintenance release (counter, starting with 0) and "b" is only used for security releases (counter, starting

Re: /dev/sdX passthrough to vm

Hi Piotr, Is should be possible via domain XML manupulation: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/virtualization_administration_guide/sect-virtualization-adding_storage_devices_to_guests-adding_hard_drives_and_other_block_devices_to_a_guest I'm not sure

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

Thanks for stepping up and sharing your plan. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 5:36:55 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider +1, on the

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

(+ users) All, Generally speaking, any versioning/styling change can be perceived as a big or concerning change by users (those existing or new ones trying/adopting). So, we must get our message across properly and correctly. I'm not for or against cosmetics change in versioning, but I'm

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.19.1.0

Thanks for volunteering Suresh. Agree as Daan has mentioned, community would benefit to have the 4.18.2.0 first with some gap to then have 4.19.1.0. The 4.19.1 RC by May end or early June LGTM. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

Hi Wei, all, Thanks for the thread, I've no objections to either of the options, but option2 is preferred as Debian 11 security will EOL mid of this year. So, if not in 4.20, eventually we'll need to migrate systemvmtemplate base OS to Debian 12 at some point in future. The bigger implication

Re: new website is life

Fantastic! Great to see the new website finally go live after a decade, congratulations everybody! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 13:52 To: dev ; users Subject: new website is life People, we brought the new website.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0

Thanks Abhishek and everyone involved in the effort. And congratulations everyone ! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 5:48:54 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 Hi all,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC4

+1 (binding) Tested 4.19.0.0 RC4 packages with EL8 (Alma Linux) + KVM using mbx. Tested the following: Registered new template Registered ssh public key Created isolated network in VM deploy form Deployed VM as root admin Allow egress rules for isolated network Created PF and FW rules, was able

[DISCUSS] Next cmk release

All, Anybody have any feature/improvements requests and bugs to report for the next cmk release? (RM/release timeline yet to be discussed/determined). Please add them here - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/issues Regards.

CloudStack India User Group Meetup

Dear all, Reminder - today is the deadline for the CloudStack India User Group meetup CFP. The meetup is on the 23rd Feb 2024 in Hyderabad, India. Kindly submit your talk ideas by today, or RSVP your physical attendance on the meetup link -

Re: 4.19 - New Release Announcement

Here's a quote you can use: "4.19 is a fantastic release that is culmination of all our efforts from much of last year coming together with a ton of exciting new features and benefits for existing and new users such as VMware to KVM instance migration, a new pluggable object storage framework

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC3

Thanks Abhishek and all involved for your hard work - it's not uncommon to create multiple RCs for a major .0 release - hope to get there with the next one. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 18:55 To: users ;

Re: new website design

+1 overall, but there are a few things I would consider blockers: 1. the blog page doesn't look same as on current blog (prod). https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/blog (staging blog) versus https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/ (current blog/prod.) If we can fix the blog listing and the

Re: Setup Linstor Plugin for ACS

Hi, I got my rough notes here; https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/7844bfa8cbc9586408ce3596c71caa50 And there is a guide here - https://linbit.com/drbd-user-guide/linstor-guide-1_0-en Regards.

Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli

Congratulations Alex! Regards. From: João Jandre Paraquetti Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 18:34 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli Congrats, Alexandre! Best regards, João Jandre On 1/10/24 19:27, Nux wrote: >

Re: CloudStack India User Group (CSIUG) Meetup

. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 17:48 To: Apache CloudStack Marketing Subject: CloudStack India User Group (CSIUG) Meetup All, I would like to propose organising the next CSIUG meetup in India. Ours last one in Bangalore was very

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release

Thanks Abhishek, looking forward to RC1. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2023 6:14:43 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release Hi all, I would like to announce the

Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov

Congratulations and well done Vladi ! Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 15:27 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov Well done, Vladi! :) On 2023-12-12 09:52, Daan Hoogland wrote: > community, >

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

discussions: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343 Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 14:50 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github

Re: [D] Test Discussion [cloudstack]

Confirm - messages from Github Discussions end up on mailing list, but it's not two-way sync'd from users mailing list to Github. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 17:22 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: NuxRo (via GitHub) Subject: Re: [D]

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

ards. From: Pearl d'Silva Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 22:21 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum +1 Regards, Pearl Dsilva From: R

[VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

All, Following the discussion thread on adopting Github Discussions as users forum [1], I put the following proposal for a vote: 1. Adopt and use Github Discussions as user forums. 2. The Github Discussions feature is tied with the users@cloudstack.apache.org mailing list (PR:

Re: new committer Bryan Lima

Congratulations Bryan on becoming a committer! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 16:37 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer Bryan Lima excuse me everybody, and mostly Bryan, for my C technology applied. We

Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar

Congratulations Abhishek, well deserved! Regards. From: Daman Arora Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 17:46 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar Many congrats Abhishek! On Thu, Nov 23, 2023, 9:25 p.m. Wei ZHOU

Re: Need Assistance with CloudStack Instance

e storage and click okay. EXPECTED RESULTS instance should migrate to target host along with the volumes/disk migration as specified in the above steps. Regards, Punitha HS Internal Use - Confidential -Original Message----- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 8:05 PM

Re: Snapshot revert is getting failed

bled Internal Use - Confidential -Original Message----- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 8:08 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Snapshot revert is getting failed [EXTERNAL EMAIL] I think volume snapshots on PowerFlex don't capture RAM - so reverting that should req

Re: Snapshot revert is getting failed

I think volume snapshots on PowerFlex don't capture RAM - so reverting that should require stopping the VM. Are you able to revert volume snapshots after stopping the VM? Ideally this would be an issue originating from PowerFlex's side. Regards. From: Hs,

Re: Need Assistance with CloudStack Instance

Hi Punitha, It can depend on case-by-case basis for managed storage. For Powerflex live VM migration with storage between two storage pools seems to be supported as per: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7408 and

Re: Usage for disks

Hi Francisco, Volumes in allocated state aren't physically created on primary storage, they exist only in CloudStack's database. Regards. From: Francisco Arencibia Quesada Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 15:35 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Usage

Re: Can't upload ova file format

Hi, OVA templates aren't supported for KVM. You could convert the ova/vmdk to qcow2/img to be able to use it with KVM. Regards. From: Technology Rss Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2023 11:25 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject:

Re: KVM Backup solutions

Hi Wally, There is also Dell/EMC Networker - though I've not personally tested it. There could also be adhoc backup strategies by using volume snapshot with replicated storage, or using a software defined storage (such as Ceph, Linstor and others) that offers some kind of replication (DR etc).

Re: noVNC performance

d, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:26 AM Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Murilo, > > Have you tested/compared VNC based traffic between CloudStack VMs and > proxmox (or others) from the same server and client locations? > > Depending on your env, if you've a busy console proxy you can try to > upg

Re: noVNC performance

Hi Murilo, Have you tested/compared VNC based traffic between CloudStack VMs and proxmox (or others) from the same server and client locations? Depending on your env, if you've a busy console proxy you can try to upgrade the systemvm (CPVM) offering with more CPU (cores and speed) and look at

Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status

kar wrote: > Thank you Stephan. > > Yes, Rohit Yadav > I was referring to the *Tungsten Fabric* Website only. Wherein the > Website's Landing page says - > > *"Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has > decided to shut down the project and will

Quotes for CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2023

challenges you've overcome. You can email me your quotes to ro...@apache.org. Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you as well as meeting you at , during 23-24 Nov 2023 in Paris! Regards, Rohit Yadav

Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status

s question of how this will impact the integration with Cloudstack Best regards, Stephan > Rohit Yadav hat am 26.10.2023 10:59 CEST > geschrieben: > > > Hi Rohit, > > Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the next TF > release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.

Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status

Hi Rohit, Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the next TF release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.19 release - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/milestone/2 In the meanwhile, any user efforts in testing and submitting bugs/improvement requests on Github

Re: CPU and Memory information in the startup dashboard

Hi Murilo, Yes indeed! A new redesigned dashboard is coming in the upcoming 4.19, you may check this here - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7956 Regards. From: Murilo Moura Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 07:01 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: API-driven Console Access createConsoleEndpoint

Hi Swen, The UI certainly uses the API to generate/get the URL to launch the web-console. However, in order to use the API, the API call must be authenticated. Regards. From: m...@swen.io Sent: Friday, October 20, 2023 15:35 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Project Limits

Hi Marty, In addition to what Pearl has advised, the limits are defined in global settings (search for max.project or max.account) which can be overriden on per domain/account/project levels. Regards. From: Pearl d'Silva Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2023

Re: SAML Certificates Expired

Hi Sean, I think by default the expiry period is 10s of years. To re-generate new certificates, you can backup your DB and delete from the two saml related entries in cloud.keystore table and restart the management server(s) one by one. Next, you'll need to re-register the CloudStack SAML SP

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.18.1.0

Congratulations everyone on the new release, and thanks Wei and everyone involved in the release and voting process. Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 20:36 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Wei ZHOU Subject: Re:

Re: GSOC 2023 Results

Well done Ayush, thank you for your contribution! Looking forward to still seeing you around in the community even after the GSoC. Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 19:40 To: users ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org ;

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

4.18.1.0 *passes* with 5 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Rohit Yadav Nux (Lucian) Boris Stoyanov Nicolas Vazquez Wei Zhou +1 (non binding) Harikrishna Patnala 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give

Re: Load Balancer in front of Console Proxy

Hi Ricardo, When using novnc, you'll need to open a few settings. In this old thread, I've details how to setup an external nginx proxy server that does SSL offloading for both the novnc web service and websockets proxy: https://www.mail-archive.com/users@cloudstack.apache.org/msg32064.html

Re: Can I use KVM local storage for user vm

Hi, It appears you've selected the host ID c26965e6-bf5f-482e-9cff-849174f6f476 when deploying the VM. Later in the logs it mentions: 2023-09-07 04:43:07,996 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.a.LocalStoragePoolAllocator] (API-Job-Executor-8:ctx-45334d86 job-14 ctx-c4c19ea4) (logid:28386839)

Re: Rocky linux nuclei

Hi Mariusz, CloudStack doesn't directly manage/configure the network bridge say on KVM hosts or configures networking of management/usage server hosts. We assume the user would do that and then use mgmt/usage server or configure/add KVM hosts. There might be suggestions in the docs/install

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

+1 binding, have manually tested the new changes since RC2 in an adv zone KVM env with nfs and local storage. Regards. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 2:05:26 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

Thanks Wei. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 13:49 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2) Hi all, Thanks a lot for your testing, Rohit, Hari, Lucian, Nicolas and Bobby.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Upgraded a multi-zone (edge and core) KVM env with NFS, local storage > and Linstor storage from 4.18.0.0 to 4.18.1.0. Post upgrade tested VM > deployment as root admin and normal user account. > > I hit the issue of procedures not found as I

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Upgraded a multi-zone (edge and core) KVM env with NFS, local storage and Linstor storage from 4.18.0.0 to 4.18.1.0. Post upgrade tested VM deployment as root admin and normal user account. I hit the issue of procedures not found as I had moved my DB from one host to another and

Re: Reminder on triaging role to access and use Github better

Hi Daan, Sorry missed this email - yes we can put this somewhere on the project wiki/website if required or on Github's README. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, July 14, 2023 12:05 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav Cc: users

Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website

Thanks Ivet, the new iterated design looks impressive especially some of the new graphical elements. +1 to moving forward with the proposed design. Let's collect any further feedback and ideas from the community and if there are no objections go ahead with updating the preview/staging site

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.18.1.0

Thanks Wei. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 14:27 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.18.1.0 Hi all, This vote has to be closed, as we found a critical issue that the direct-download

Re: Unable to add host error ACS

ue Regards. From: Technology Mail Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2023 13:33 To: Rohit Yadav ; users@cloudstack.apache.org ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Unable to add host error ACS Now I am using 4.18, Ubuntu 20.04 server. KVM server cloud and libvirt agent service not start

Re: Query to Cloudstack API is degraded

timing tab of the > browser and > > http://:8080/client/#/vm?details=min > http:// IP>:8080/client/#/vm?details=servoff,tmpl,nics > > Only 1 second, much better > > > BR, > > Ricardo Pertuz > > > On 25 Aug 2023, 6:41 AM -0500, Rohit Yadav , > wrote:

Re: Query to Cloudstack API is degraded

ted to database performance/index as it not happening in QA Atte, Ricardo Pertuz On 24 Aug 2023, 6:33 AM -0500, Rohit Yadav , wrote: > Hi Ricardo, > > Can you share more details, such as; > > - which APIs you think have degraded > - how have you concluded that they are degrading? >

Re: Query to Cloudstack API is degraded

Hi Ricardo, Can you share more details, such as; - which APIs you think have degraded - how have you concluded that they are degrading? - are those list API or other async/action oriented APIs? - which version of CloudStack and MySQL server is this, other details about your env (hypervisor,

Re: [Consultation] Remove DB HA feature (db.ha.enabled)

On 2023-08-22 15:36, K B Shiv Kumar wrote: >>>>> We faced some issues when running Galera. We went back to master >>>>> slave. >>>>> Anyone using Galera in production for a long time? >>>>> Regards, >>>&g

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release

Thanks for the proposal Abhishek, sounds good to me. Looking forward to 4.19! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 22:47 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release Hi,

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.1.0 release

Thanks for the update Wei. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 19:42 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.1.0 release Thanks for the update, Wei. Good job so far! On 2023-08-21 12:48,

Re: [Consultation] Remove DB HA feature (db.ha.enabled)

t;> Happy to contribute a doc on how to achieve HA if we decide to remove >> this. >> >> Thanks >> >> On 2023-08-22 15:01, Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> +1 it's a broken feature that at least doesn't work with MySQL 8.x, >>> I'm not sure if it worked with

Re: [Consultation] Remove DB HA feature (db.ha.enabled)

+1 it's a broken feature that at least doesn't work with MySQL 8.x, I'm not sure if it worked with prior versions of MySQL. However, we need to document some sort of suggested MySQL HA setup in our docs. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 18:54

[DISCUSS] Simplifying constructs and UX

All, Request for comments on following ideas, largely in the UI: 1. Does it make sense to simply the Default View as a Project which cannot be deleted and primary space for the Account. Essentially, the default view is the logged in account/user's project with no other collaborators 2.

Re: Apache CloudStack and Ceph

infrastructure. Such functionality in CS is very much needed. Regards, Piotr -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 1:30 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack and Ceph Hi Piotr, Thanks for sharing, could you explain what

Re: Apache CloudStack and Ceph

Hi Piotr, Thanks for sharing, could you explain what you mean by 'create ceph object shares in CloudStack'? Do you mean, perhaps CloudStack create/orchestrates Ceph using containers without the user having to setup the infra manually and then add to cloudstack? Regards.

Re: set display_name as hostname to instances

hostname on the VMs. Regards, Cristian -Original Message----- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 7:03 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: set display_name as hostname to instances Historically, the use of display name in case of instances and other resources (such as

Re: Apache CloudStack and Ceph

Great, thanks for sharing Ivet. Looking forward to it. Regards. From: Stackbill Sales Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 18:59 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack and Ceph Yes, we have done several successful implementations with

Re: set display_name as hostname to instances

d'Silva Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 4:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: set display_name as hostname to instances Hi Cristian, In addition, in 4.18 a new feature - managed User data was introduced. This can be used to register userdata with custom parameters - here, t

Re: set display_name as hostname to instances

Hi Cristian, I'm not sure, but could you try user data (cloud-init data) when you deploy a VM. In there, you'll have flexibility to set the hostname of the VM to whatever you'd like. Regards. From: cristian.c@istream.today Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023

Re: Rocky 9 management setup

xpecting a separator >> Mar 09 18:14:21 dell1.fr1.clx.corp libvirtd[29917]: Driver state >> initialization failed >> >> Fixing that config allowed libvirtd to start and I was able to add >> hosts. >> >> Thanks >> -jeremy >> >> On Thursday, Mar

Re: Cloudstack Billing Integration

I think there are several options that you would need to evaluate. CloudStack has an inbuilt simple credit or prepaid based system, that's the quota plugin you can try: https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/plugins/quota.html In addition to this, one can write their own billing logic on

Re: Unable to ping System VM in Advanced Zone (without SG)

and especially thank Mr Rohit Yadav for his blog https://rohityadav.cloud/blog/cloudstack-kvm/ I was running Ceph OSD and Cloudstack on the same host and docker was causing the issue. On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:35 AM Pratik Chandrakar < chandrakarpra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes > > On Fr

Re: guest.cpu.mode per guest/vm on the same KVM host

Hi Lukáš, It's not possible to do it on per VM basis, however, do explore the extra config feature if that allows for some customisation: https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-feature-first-look-enable-sending-of-arbitrary-configuration-data-to-vms/ Not ideal - a workaround may also be to do it

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

João, Technically, for lazy consensus a vote thread needs three +1 (binding) votes which are only counted towards a decision or approval [1]. Since there are no objections but concerns shared so far, the PR can be reviewed, tested and merged as any other PR as long as it meets the community

Re: ACS upgrade to Log4J2 version 2.19

d ones, this upgrade has already been tested. All that users must do when installing the new packages is answer 'yes' when questioned about upgrading the log4j config. Best regards, João Jandre (JoaoJandre) On 26/05/2023 06:19, Rohit Yadav wrote: > João, Daniel, Daan, All, > > I've revi

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Website build and modernisation

automation once the website is fully migrated. Please continue to review and test the staging site at https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/ and report/suggest at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/issues Thanks and regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >