tion about moving to
. .
I would be ok to +1 that ^^^
-paul
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 4:02 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
As I understand Daan's vote proposa
cking this vote thead or do you want to reconsider your vote?
Regards.
From: Paul Angus
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 15:55
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
Hi Daan,
From
05 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
Vivek, we could, but the main idea is that we repair our versioning system and
make clear how we are actually dealing with our current system, which is major
- new , possibly breaking
>
> >
> >
> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases
> > (section on versioning about 2/3 down)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland
> > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 12:50 PM
> &
'A change to the version numbering scheme' and then what is
> proposed properly laid out.
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases
> (section on versioning about 2/3 down)
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Daan
> (section on versioning about 2/3 down)
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 12:50 PM
> To: dev
> Cc: users
> Subject: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
>
> LS,
>
> This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to
+1
On 2024-02-19 15:09, Andrija Panic wrote:
+1
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 13:50, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
counted please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
scheme. The
luence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases (section
on versioning about 2/3 down)
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 12:50 PM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If
+1
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 13:50, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> LS,
>
> This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
> counted please reply to dev@.
>
> As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
> scheme. The result would be that the next major
+1
Op 19/02/2024 om 13:49 schreef Daan Hoogland:
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
counted please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 1:50 PM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted
please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be
counted please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning
scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20
instead of 4.20, as it would be in a traditional
12 matches
Mail list logo
