Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status
Hi Simon, Thank you for sharing the details. Will wait for the same. On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 20:02, Simon Weller wrote: > All, > > There are some ongoing talks regarding a potential fork of Tungsten Fabric. > I suggest we let those play out before we make any decisions on the > plugin. > > -Si > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 9:47 AM Rohit Yadav > wrote: > > > Hi Rohit P, > > > > As I've shared in my earlier reply, CloudStack already supports Tungsten > > Fabric so given news on TF's website it's really up our community to > > discuss this further, propose and evaluate options. > > > > Apart from TF, we do have alternative SDN support in CloudStack, first > and > > foremost CloudStack's very own native virtual router and support for VPC, > > isolated, L2 and shared networks; along with that, we've a bunch of > > network plugins for variety of network functions ( > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/main/plugins/network-elements) > > and an upcoming integration with VMware NSX (there's a talk proposes for > > CCC https://www.cloudstackcollab.org/#schedule and a work-in-progress > > pull request). > > > > Generally speaking, as with any software project and integration > > dependencies, when there is lack of access to software or hardware and > > licenses (for testing, CI/CD) by the community, and lack of support by > the > > vendor or users, the original integration may develop stability and > > maintenance issues longer term. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > From: Rohit Palsulkar > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 16:20 > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > > > > Hi Rohit, > > > > Kindly help me with the query I have asked earlier. > > > > "Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten Integration > > will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to > > Tungsten?" > > > > > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 03:06, Rohit Palsulkar < > rohit.palsul...@indiqus.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Thank you Stephan. > > > > > > Yes, Rohit Yadav > > > I was referring to the *Tungsten Fabric* Website only. Wherein the > > > Website's Landing page says - > > > > > > *"Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has > > > decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August > > 1, > > > 2024."* > > > > > > Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten > Integration > > > will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to > > > Tungsten? > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 19:30, Rohit Yadav > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Stephan, Rohit P. for the thread. I couldn't see the attached > > >> screenshot which possibly got stripped from the mail (mailing lists > > doesn't > > >> allow such attachments). > > >> > > >> Support for Tungsten Fabric already exists in CloudStack, but given > the > > >> new update on TF's website I suppose all of us in the community needs > to > > >> review this change and evaluate options. > > >> > > >> > > >> Regards. > > >> > > >> > > >> From: Stephan Bienek > > >> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:45 > > >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > > >> > > >> Rohit P. might be referring to Tungsten Fabric instead of Terraform. > > >> > > >> On the project website of Tungsten Fabric the project team states: > > >> > > >> "Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has > > >> decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on > August > > 1, > > >> 2024." > > >> > > >> which would give the right relation to Rohit`s question of how this > will > > >> impact the integration with Cloudstack > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Stephan > > >> > > >> > Rohit Yadav hat am 26.10.2023 10:59 > CEST > > >> geschrieben: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Rohit, > > >> > > > >> > Some triaging work was done last month,
Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status
All, There are some ongoing talks regarding a potential fork of Tungsten Fabric. I suggest we let those play out before we make any decisions on the plugin. -Si On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 9:47 AM Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Rohit P, > > As I've shared in my earlier reply, CloudStack already supports Tungsten > Fabric so given news on TF's website it's really up our community to > discuss this further, propose and evaluate options. > > Apart from TF, we do have alternative SDN support in CloudStack, first and > foremost CloudStack's very own native virtual router and support for VPC, > isolated, L2 and shared networks; along with that, we've a bunch of > network plugins for variety of network functions ( > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/main/plugins/network-elements) > and an upcoming integration with VMware NSX (there's a talk proposes for > CCC https://www.cloudstackcollab.org/#schedule and a work-in-progress > pull request). > > Generally speaking, as with any software project and integration > dependencies, when there is lack of access to software or hardware and > licenses (for testing, CI/CD) by the community, and lack of support by the > vendor or users, the original integration may develop stability and > maintenance issues longer term. > > > Regards. > > > From: Rohit Palsulkar > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 16:20 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > > Hi Rohit, > > Kindly help me with the query I have asked earlier. > > "Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten Integration > will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to > Tungsten?" > > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 03:06, Rohit Palsulkar > > wrote: > > > Thank you Stephan. > > > > Yes, Rohit Yadav > > I was referring to the *Tungsten Fabric* Website only. Wherein the > > Website's Landing page says - > > > > *"Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has > > decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August > 1, > > 2024."* > > > > Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten Integration > > will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to > > Tungsten? > > > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 19:30, Rohit Yadav > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Stephan, Rohit P. for the thread. I couldn't see the attached > >> screenshot which possibly got stripped from the mail (mailing lists > doesn't > >> allow such attachments). > >> > >> Support for Tungsten Fabric already exists in CloudStack, but given the > >> new update on TF's website I suppose all of us in the community needs to > >> review this change and evaluate options. > >> > >> > >> Regards. > >> > >> > >> From: Stephan Bienek > >> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:45 > >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > >> > >> Rohit P. might be referring to Tungsten Fabric instead of Terraform. > >> > >> On the project website of Tungsten Fabric the project team states: > >> > >> "Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has > >> decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August > 1, > >> 2024." > >> > >> which would give the right relation to Rohit`s question of how this will > >> impact the integration with Cloudstack > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Stephan > >> > >> > Rohit Yadav hat am 26.10.2023 10:59 CEST > >> geschrieben: > >> > > >> > > >> > Hi Rohit, > >> > > >> > Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the > >> next TF release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.19 release - > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/milestone/2 > >> > > >> > In the meanwhile, any user efforts in testing and submitting > >> bugs/improvement requests on Github are welcome. > >> > > >> > > >> > Regards. > >> > > >> > > >> > From: Rohit Palsulkar > >> > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:25 > >> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > >> > Subject: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > >> > > >> > Hi All, > >> > > &g
Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status
Hi Rohit P, As I've shared in my earlier reply, CloudStack already supports Tungsten Fabric so given news on TF's website it's really up our community to discuss this further, propose and evaluate options. Apart from TF, we do have alternative SDN support in CloudStack, first and foremost CloudStack's very own native virtual router and support for VPC, isolated, L2 and shared networks; along with that, we've a bunch of network plugins for variety of network functions (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/main/plugins/network-elements) and an upcoming integration with VMware NSX (there's a talk proposes for CCC https://www.cloudstackcollab.org/#schedule and a work-in-progress pull request). Generally speaking, as with any software project and integration dependencies, when there is lack of access to software or hardware and licenses (for testing, CI/CD) by the community, and lack of support by the vendor or users, the original integration may develop stability and maintenance issues longer term. Regards. From: Rohit Palsulkar Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 16:20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status Hi Rohit, Kindly help me with the query I have asked earlier. "Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten Integration will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to Tungsten?" On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 03:06, Rohit Palsulkar wrote: > Thank you Stephan. > > Yes, Rohit Yadav > I was referring to the *Tungsten Fabric* Website only. Wherein the > Website's Landing page says - > > *"Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has > decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August 1, > 2024."* > > Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten Integration > will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to > Tungsten? > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 19:30, Rohit Yadav > wrote: > >> Thanks Stephan, Rohit P. for the thread. I couldn't see the attached >> screenshot which possibly got stripped from the mail (mailing lists doesn't >> allow such attachments). >> >> Support for Tungsten Fabric already exists in CloudStack, but given the >> new update on TF's website I suppose all of us in the community needs to >> review this change and evaluate options. >> >> >> Regards. >> >> ____________ >> From: Stephan Bienek >> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:45 >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status >> >> Rohit P. might be referring to Tungsten Fabric instead of Terraform. >> >> On the project website of Tungsten Fabric the project team states: >> >> "Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has >> decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August 1, >> 2024." >> >> which would give the right relation to Rohit`s question of how this will >> impact the integration with Cloudstack >> >> Best regards, >> Stephan >> >> > Rohit Yadav hat am 26.10.2023 10:59 CEST >> geschrieben: >> > >> > >> > Hi Rohit, >> > >> > Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the >> next TF release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.19 release - >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/milestone/2 >> > >> > In the meanwhile, any user efforts in testing and submitting >> bugs/improvement requests on Github are welcome. >> > >> > >> > Regards. >> > >> > >> > From: Rohit Palsulkar >> > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:25 >> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> > Subject: CloudStack - TF Integration Status >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I just wanted to know the status of the CloudStack - TF Integration. Is >> it still happening? >> > >> > I came across the TF Website and saw below message - >> > >> > [Screenshot 2023-10-26 at 2.07.48 PM.png] >> > >> > Kindly let us know if this will affect the ongoing development towards >> the Integration with Cloudstack? >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Rohit P >> > [ >> https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4yvCmOZqibK4B_l3XOxCFDHWF9Qo_rdu2JLbrcXZf9-hhM9s8z-Lg2J-zCpyobbFnVUAAzHtRg >> ] >> > >> > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity >> to which it is addressed and may contain confiden
Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status
Hi Rohit, Kindly help me with the query I have asked earlier. "Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten Integration will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to Tungsten?" On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 03:06, Rohit Palsulkar wrote: > Thank you Stephan. > > Yes, Rohit Yadav > I was referring to the *Tungsten Fabric* Website only. Wherein the > Website's Landing page says - > > *"Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has > decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August 1, > 2024."* > > Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten Integration > will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to > Tungsten? > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 19:30, Rohit Yadav > wrote: > >> Thanks Stephan, Rohit P. for the thread. I couldn't see the attached >> screenshot which possibly got stripped from the mail (mailing lists doesn't >> allow such attachments). >> >> Support for Tungsten Fabric already exists in CloudStack, but given the >> new update on TF's website I suppose all of us in the community needs to >> review this change and evaluate options. >> >> >> Regards. >> >> ____________ >> From: Stephan Bienek >> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:45 >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status >> >> Rohit P. might be referring to Tungsten Fabric instead of Terraform. >> >> On the project website of Tungsten Fabric the project team states: >> >> "Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has >> decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August 1, >> 2024." >> >> which would give the right relation to Rohit`s question of how this will >> impact the integration with Cloudstack >> >> Best regards, >> Stephan >> >> > Rohit Yadav hat am 26.10.2023 10:59 CEST >> geschrieben: >> > >> > >> > Hi Rohit, >> > >> > Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the >> next TF release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.19 release - >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/milestone/2 >> > >> > In the meanwhile, any user efforts in testing and submitting >> bugs/improvement requests on Github are welcome. >> > >> > >> > Regards. >> > >> > >> > From: Rohit Palsulkar >> > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:25 >> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> > Subject: CloudStack - TF Integration Status >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I just wanted to know the status of the CloudStack - TF Integration. Is >> it still happening? >> > >> > I came across the TF Website and saw below message - >> > >> > [Screenshot 2023-10-26 at 2.07.48 PM.png] >> > >> > Kindly let us know if this will affect the ongoing development towards >> the Integration with Cloudstack? >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Rohit P >> > [ >> https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4yvCmOZqibK4B_l3XOxCFDHWF9Qo_rdu2JLbrcXZf9-hhM9s8z-Lg2J-zCpyobbFnVUAAzHtRg >> ] >> > >> > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity >> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the >> original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are >> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this >> communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been >> obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, >> please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep >> e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are >> virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of >> viruses. >> >> >> >> > > -- > Regards, > Rohit P > > -- Regards, Rohit P -- This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status
Thank you Stephan. Yes, Rohit Yadav I was referring to the *Tungsten Fabric* Website only. Wherein the Website's Landing page says - *"Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August 1, 2024."* Could you please confirm if the development towards Tungsten Integration will not happen going forward? If yes, do we have any alternatives to Tungsten? On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 19:30, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Thanks Stephan, Rohit P. for the thread. I couldn't see the attached > screenshot which possibly got stripped from the mail (mailing lists doesn't > allow such attachments). > > Support for Tungsten Fabric already exists in CloudStack, but given the > new update on TF's website I suppose all of us in the community needs to > review this change and evaluate options. > > > Regards. > > > From: Stephan Bienek > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:45 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > > Rohit P. might be referring to Tungsten Fabric instead of Terraform. > > On the project website of Tungsten Fabric the project team states: > > "Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has decided > to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August 1, 2024." > > which would give the right relation to Rohit`s question of how this will > impact the integration with Cloudstack > > Best regards, > Stephan > > > Rohit Yadav hat am 26.10.2023 10:59 CEST > geschrieben: > > > > > > Hi Rohit, > > > > Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the next > TF release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.19 release - > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/milestone/2 > > > > In the meanwhile, any user efforts in testing and submitting > bugs/improvement requests on Github are welcome. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > From: Rohit Palsulkar > > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:25 > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > > > > Hi All, > > > > I just wanted to know the status of the CloudStack - TF Integration. Is > it still happening? > > > > I came across the TF Website and saw below message - > > > > [Screenshot 2023-10-26 at 2.07.48 PM.png] > > > > Kindly let us know if this will affect the ongoing development towards > the Integration with Cloudstack? > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Rohit P > > [ > https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4yvCmOZqibK4B_l3XOxCFDHWF9Qo_rdu2JLbrcXZf9-hhM9s8z-Lg2J-zCpyobbFnVUAAzHtRg > ] > > > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the > original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been > obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep > e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are > virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of > viruses. > > > > -- Regards, Rohit P -- This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status
Thanks Stephan, Rohit P. for the thread. I couldn't see the attached screenshot which possibly got stripped from the mail (mailing lists doesn't allow such attachments). Support for Tungsten Fabric already exists in CloudStack, but given the new update on TF's website I suppose all of us in the community needs to review this change and evaluate options. Regards. From: Stephan Bienek Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:45 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status Rohit P. might be referring to Tungsten Fabric instead of Terraform. On the project website of Tungsten Fabric the project team states: "Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August 1, 2024." which would give the right relation to Rohit`s question of how this will impact the integration with Cloudstack Best regards, Stephan > Rohit Yadav hat am 26.10.2023 10:59 CEST > geschrieben: > > > Hi Rohit, > > Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the next TF > release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.19 release - > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/milestone/2 > > In the meanwhile, any user efforts in testing and submitting bugs/improvement > requests on Github are welcome. > > > Regards. > > > From: Rohit Palsulkar > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:25 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > > Hi All, > > I just wanted to know the status of the CloudStack - TF Integration. Is it > still happening? > > I came across the TF Website and saw below message - > > [Screenshot 2023-10-26 at 2.07.48 PM.png] > > Kindly let us know if this will affect the ongoing development towards the > Integration with Cloudstack? > > -- > Regards, > Rohit P > [https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4yvCmOZqibK4B_l3XOxCFDHWF9Qo_rdu2JLbrcXZf9-hhM9s8z-Lg2J-zCpyobbFnVUAAzHtRg] > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the > original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been > obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep > e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are > virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of > viruses.
Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status
Rohit P. might be referring to Tungsten Fabric instead of Terraform. On the project website of Tungsten Fabric the project team states: "Thank you for your interest in Tungsten Fabric. The community has decided to shut down the project and will sunset this website on August 1, 2024." which would give the right relation to Rohit`s question of how this will impact the integration with Cloudstack Best regards, Stephan > Rohit Yadav hat am 26.10.2023 10:59 CEST > geschrieben: > > > Hi Rohit, > > Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the next TF > release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.19 release - > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/milestone/2 > > In the meanwhile, any user efforts in testing and submitting bugs/improvement > requests on Github are welcome. > > > Regards. > > > From: Rohit Palsulkar > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:25 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: CloudStack - TF Integration Status > > Hi All, > > I just wanted to know the status of the CloudStack - TF Integration. Is it > still happening? > > I came across the TF Website and saw below message - > > [Screenshot 2023-10-26 at 2.07.48 PM.png] > > Kindly let us know if this will affect the ongoing development towards the > Integration with Cloudstack? > > -- > Regards, > Rohit P > [https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4yvCmOZqibK4B_l3XOxCFDHWF9Qo_rdu2JLbrcXZf9-hhM9s8z-Lg2J-zCpyobbFnVUAAzHtRg] > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the > original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been > obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep > e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are > virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of > viruses.
Re: CloudStack - TF Integration Status
Hi Rohit, Some triaging work was done last month, we hope to work towards the next TF release v0.5.0 after ACS 4.19 release - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/milestone/2 In the meanwhile, any user efforts in testing and submitting bugs/improvement requests on Github are welcome. Regards. From: Rohit Palsulkar Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 14:25 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack - TF Integration Status Hi All, I just wanted to know the status of the CloudStack - TF Integration. Is it still happening? I came across the TF Website and saw below message - [Screenshot 2023-10-26 at 2.07.48 PM.png] Kindly let us know if this will affect the ongoing development towards the Integration with Cloudstack? -- Regards, Rohit P [https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4yvCmOZqibK4B_l3XOxCFDHWF9Qo_rdu2JLbrcXZf9-hhM9s8z-Lg2J-zCpyobbFnVUAAzHtRg] This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
CloudStack - TF Integration Status
Hi All, I just wanted to know the status of the *CloudStack - TF Integration*. Is it still happening? I came across the TF Website and saw below message - [image: Screenshot 2023-10-26 at 2.07.48 PM.png] Kindly let us know if this will affect the ongoing development towards the Integration with Cloudstack? -- Regards, Rohit P -- This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
