On 10/26/2016 06:12 AM, Rainer Nerb wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> we're currently testing a 2-node-cluster with 2 vms and live migration
> on CentOS 7.2 and Pacemaker 1.1.13-10 with disks on iSCSI-targets and
> migration via ssh-method.
>
> Live migration works, if we issue "pcs resource move ...", "pc
On 11/01/2016 02:31 AM, Siwakoti, Ganesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> i'm using CentOS release 6.8 (Final) as a KVM and i configured 3
> nodes(PM1.local,PM2.local and PM3.local), and using
> CMAN clustering. Resources running at two nodes as Active node then
> another one node is for Fail-over resource as
On 11/01/2016 03:17 AM, Ganesh Siwakoti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using CentOS release 6.8 (Final) (KVM) and I want to make failover
> cluster.i've 2 same nodes for clustering(both are KVM), so which version
> of Pacemaker and Cman is appropriate for me?
Personally, I'd stick with the packages pro
On 11/02/2016 11:17 AM, Niu Sibo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a general question regarding the fence login in pacemaker.
>
> I have setup a three nodes cluster with Pacemaker 1.1.13 and cluster
> property no_quorum_policy set to ignore. When two nodes lost their NIC
> corosync is running on at the
Hi all,
I have a general question regarding the fence login in pacemaker.
I have setup a three nodes cluster with Pacemaker 1.1.13 and cluster
property no_quorum_policy set to ignore. When two nodes lost their NIC
corosync is running on at the same time, it looks like the two nodes are
gettin