Re: [ClusterLabs] fence_ipmilan power_timeout ValueError

2017-07-14 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 13/07/17 09:11 -0400, Ron Kerry wrote: > I have a customer who recently tried to create fence-ipmilan > resources with a power_timeout parameters set to 60s. His reasoning > was that the parameter is set to be a string value, so he expected > the 's' modifier on the 60 value to be interpreted

Re: [ClusterLabs] Problem with stonith and starting services

2017-07-14 Thread Cesar Hernandez
> > > So if this is really the reason it would probably be worth > finding out what is really happening. > Thanks. Yes, I think this is really the reason. I fixed it one week ago and hasn't happened again ___ Users mailing list:

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD split brain after Cluster node recovery

2017-07-14 Thread ArekW
I have active-active NSF on gfs2 on dual-primary DRBD. As for stonith I have no reason to think that it is not working because when I poweroff one node, the second node can bring it up automatically. Also I have situation where fence shut down or reboot another node. It seems than it is working

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD split brain after Cluster node recovery

2017-07-14 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 7/14/2017 3:57 AM, ArekW wrote: Hi, I have stonith run and tested. The problem was that there is mistake in drbd documentation. The 'fencing' belongs to net (not disk). If you are running NFS on top of a dual-primary DRBD with some sort of a cluster filesystem, I'd think *that* is your

Re: [ClusterLabs] Active-Active NFS cluster failover test - system hangs (VirtualBox)

2017-07-14 Thread ArekW
I'm still having troubles with 2-node active-active configuration for NFS. The standby and unstandby of any node seems to work fine but NFS hungs every time a node state changes. When both nodes are up and I do ls on client1 I get directory listing. Sometimes when a node is put to standby the ls

Re: [ClusterLabs] Problem with stonith and starting services

2017-07-14 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 07/12/2017 05:16 PM, Cesar Hernandez wrote: > >> El 6 jul 2017, a las 17:34, Ken Gaillot escribió: >> >> On 07/06/2017 10:27 AM, Cesar Hernandez wrote: It looks like a bug when the fenced node rejoins quickly enough that it is a member again before its fencing